Search results

Dave Olson asserted: “In 1 Samuel 15:27, the NKJV inserts ‘Saul’ where ‘he’ is supposed to be. Some might say, ‘What’s the problem? It refers to the same person. Isn’t that the same thing?’ Once you begin to make changes based on what you think is more appropriate, you no longer have a pure copy...

Some Improvements to the King James Version from the Majority Greek Manuscripts by William Pierpont (1915-2003)...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/unearthed-social-media-posts-contradict-el-sayed-s-capitalist-narrative/ar-AA2dI4aU?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6ac5a138778b415ea436263e56b4d7df&ei=11...

Your point is basically the same point as that of many KJV-only advocates. You have not demonstrated a difference in your understanding of preservation and the understanding of some KJV-only authors concerning preservation. KJV-only author Ken Matto maintained that “God had promised to...

Do you describe your own posts? You unsoundly try to dismiss the Bible translation views of the early English Bible translators and of the KJV translators just as KJV-only advocates do. Your seeming attempt to attack and dismiss these good English Bible translators is wrong. In his prologue...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/career-doj-officials-mocked-garland-s-school-board-memo-as-an-anti-maga-task-force-then-many-objectors-were-forced-out/ar-AA2dEUYI?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=46f4481c9e834324ed6eaaec9bb20e20&ei=132...

Likewise, the NKJV translators intended to make very good translations better. William Pierpont wrote: “The ‘New King James Version’ uses the same type of Greek ‘text’ as the KJV, but attempts to put it into more clearly understandable modern English” (Some Improvements to the King James...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/doj-reveals-how-biden-admin-allegedly-silenced-parents-from-speaking-out-about-atrocities-happening-in-schools/ar-AA2dDNxq?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6ac4cc4408d34fbb836e171d292cd15e&ei=10...

Did you find out how the Church of England makers of the KJV re-translated or revised many words in the pre-1611 word of God in English? It is a verifiable fact that the Church of England makers of the KJV borrowed several or even many renderings from the Roman Catholic 1582 Rheims New...

The word of God had been translated into English many years before 1611. The Church of England doctrinal views of the makers of the KJV influenced their translation decisions. The KJV translators changed some renderings in the pre-1611 word of God translated into English to make them more...

In his prologue to the Christian reader in his 1535 English translation, Miles Coverdale wrote: "Whereas some men think now the many translations make division in the faith and in the people of God, it is not so." In their comments to the brethren of England, Scotland, Ireland, etc. in the...

Do you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with complaining about the posting of others at least mine? Is that odd on your part? Your opinion is incorrect since my posting does not occupy 99% of my time, not even 50% of my time, nor even 25% of my time. It is not the same exact material...

My information related directly to the statement from the poster whom I quoted. Would you claim that the subject of the Scriptures is unimportant? Would you claim that reading the Bible year after year is redundant and unnecessary?

The Church of England makers of the KJV removed many words found in the pre-1611 English Bibles. Along with reducing the number of uses of several archaic words, the KJV completely removed some archaic, antiquated, rare, unusual, or difficult words or spellings found in one or more of the...

You continue to miss my points and continue to misrepresent them. You present no substance and evidence that prove your incorrect arguments borrowed from KJV-only reasoning to be true and scriptural. Your conclusions are not warranted by what you have posted. You have failed to clarify and...

Did the Isaiah scroll that Jesus read or used in Luke 4 agree completely with the Hebrew Masoretic text at Isaiah 61:1-2? G. K. Beale wrote: “Jesus goes to Nazareth, attends a synagogue service, and is handed the scroll of Isaiah the prophet” (Handbook, p. 57). John Meade and Peter Gurry...

Your own sources do not warrant the KJV-only-type conclusions to which you seem to jump. You do not demonstrate that your sources support your unproven conclusions. Wilbur Pickering wrote: “I affirm that a ‘perfect’ translation is impossible. (Indeed, a tolerably reasonable approximation is...

That is not the real issue. Your opinions and assertions are not grounded in verifiable facts and in truth. Your own sources do not support your assertions. You in effect dismiss or even condemn your own sources that supposedly provided grounding for your unproven claims. You have failed to...

Here is information from your trusted source Wilbur Pickering which advances the argument of whether you jump to the right assertions or conclusions or whether you jump to the wrong assertions or conclusions concerning what your own sources state. Wilbur Pickering wrote: “The AV (KJV) has a...

According to a consistent, just application of Alan Dale Gross's assertions, did the KJV take away or omit a word or words in these examples? 1 Kings 16:12 [1611 margin—“Heb. by the hand of”] by the hand of Jehu the Prophet [1560 Geneva Bible; 1602 Bishops’ Bible] by Jehu the prophet [1611...