• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Search results

  1. L

    The "scriptures" are said to be "Given by the Inspiration of God", and I, therefore, say "The Bible we hold in our is Inspired."

    Alan, is it interesting that you in effect suggest that the scriptural truths that I have presented are not "worth a nickle"? I am surprised that you would seem to condemn scripturally-based observations and even scriptural truths. You show that you do not judge righteous judgment.
  2. L

    I Further Confess the modern critical Greek text of Scripture Can Not be Reconciled with God’s Promises about the Preservation of His Word.

    W. Edward Glenny noted: “The TR has several Greek readings which did not exist before 1516 when Erasmus put them in the Bible, and it also differs from the Majority Text over 1800 times" (Bible Version Debate, p. 51). Charles Lantz asserted: “Erasmus created a number of Greek readings that had...
  3. L

    Concerning the Preservation of Scripture.

    Charles Nichols claimed: “Perfect inspiration without perfect preservation would leave inspiration a worthless Biblical doctrine” (Brandenburg, Thou Shalt Keep Them, p. 68). Charles Nichols asked: “What value is an inspired Scripture for extended generations of human beings if it is not...
  4. L

    Concerning the Preservation of Scripture.

    This book entitled Thou Shalt Keep Them edited by Kent Brandenburg in its definitions defined King James Only as follows: “a broad title for any individuals and institutions who read, study, preach, and use only the King James Version as an English translation” (p. 11). Gary Webb maintained...
  5. L

    A Declaration of My Own Position on the Inspiration and Preservation of Holy Scripture, by Thomas Ross.

    Some KJV defenders seem to try to define or use the term KJV-only too broadly or vaguely, which could at times be an effort to try to increase greatly the number of people who supposedly accept this view. For example, the KJV-only book entitled Thou Shalt Keep Them edited by Kent Brandenburg in...
  6. L

    I Further Confess the modern critical Greek text of Scripture Can Not be Reconciled with God’s Promises about the Preservation of His Word.

    The varying printed Textus Receptus editions are not a collation of the 5,000+ Greek manuscripts currently in existence. The varying printed Textus Receptus editions are based on an imperfect, incomplete collation of likely less than 100 Greek NT manuscripts along with some readings added from...
  7. L

    A Declaration of My Own Position on the Inspiration and Preservation of Holy Scripture, by Thomas Ross.

    [bold type added by this poster] Thomas Ross acknowledged "the miraculous process" of all Scripture being given by inspiration of God. This process ended with the completion of the New Testament. Thomas Ross in effect agrees with what I have stated concerning inspiration being the process...
  8. L

    The Fable of the Unmixed, pure preserved stream of manuscripts/texts

    My posts are readable and clear, and sometimes they include the documented evidence that supports their points.
  9. L

    The Fable of the Unmixed, pure preserved stream of manuscripts/texts

    Did you forget your own comment about the KJV-only authors whom I quoted ["if they have a shred of credibility"]? What is the purpose of your comment if you were not claiming or suggesting anything?
  10. L

    The "scriptures" are said to be "Given by the Inspiration of God", and I, therefore, say "The Bible we hold in our is Inspired."

    Your opinion is incorrect. You prove no "abnormal behavior" on my part. You improperly keep insulting me or keep bashing me while you try to deny it. There are other posters who post at these forums more than I do. My posting time at this forum is typically less than one hour a day...
  11. L

    The "scriptures" are said to be "Given by the Inspiration of God", and I, therefore, say "The Bible we hold in our is Inspired."

    Do you in effect contradict yourself since your seeming strange obsession with trying to smear and bash me is demonstrated in your bogus personal attacks? Perhaps you should consider your own critical mental state. I posted more yesterday than usual because there were several posts which...
  12. L

    The "scriptures" are said to be "Given by the Inspiration of God", and I, therefore, say "The Bible we hold in our is Inspired."

    Does John Krinke have authority over the word of God so that He can declare a Greek adjective to be a Greek noun? John Krinke wrote: "An eclectic Bible version which one man possesses differs with the different eclectic Bible version of another man; both men cannot possess The Preserved Word...
  13. L

    The "scriptures" are said to be "Given by the Inspiration of God", and I, therefore, say "The Bible we hold in our is Inspired."

    Job 32:8 has not been demonstrated to be parallel to 2 Timothy 3:16. Do these two verses (2 Timothy 3:16 and Job 32:8) use the same original-language word in the same exact sense concerning the same exact subject that would indicate that they should be considered real parallel passages? Henry...
  14. L

    The "scriptures" are said to be "Given by the Inspiration of God", and I, therefore, say "The Bible we hold in our is Inspired."

    Your continuing to bear false witness discredits you. I do not paint "anyone who knows the King James Bible exists as being Peter Ruckman incarnated." Your bogus accusation is false.
  15. L

    The Fable of the Unmixed, pure preserved stream of manuscripts/texts

    The purpose of quotations is to provide the direct documented evidence for my opening statement. I quote several KJV-only authors to prove that I am not misrepresenting what they believe and to show what they themselves say that they believe. Some KJV-only advocates will claim that no one...
  16. L

    Can Democrats justly call themselves the affordability party?

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/how-can-democrats-call-themselves-the-affordability-party/ar-AA2dQL1T?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6ac7e06ca9f948daa0e83fc1b3898b22&ei=7...
  17. L

    Our Scriptural Confidence is that We have a Pure, More Sure Word of Prophecy.

    Perhaps he over-generalized or uses the fallacy of composition just like many KJV-only advocates do. Are you unaware of the fact that the KJV sometimes used prepositions in different ways or in different senses than they may be typically used in present-day standard English? Concerning...
  18. L

    The "scriptures" are said to be "Given by the Inspiration of God", and I, therefore, say "The Bible we hold in our is Inspired."

    You improperly seem to try to put words in my mouth that I do not say. I do not claim to have authority over the word of God as you falsely allege. I do not say that the KJV "was translated in no way differently univocally than all post KJV 1611 translation so you bear false witness. You try...
  19. L

    Would consistent use of the fallacy of composition make the KJV into a "take away" version?

    On page 6 and in post #104 in the thread entitled "The Extent of Corruption," Anthony Pritchard wrote: "I do claim that the Critical Text is corrupt, and I affirm that without hesitation. The corruption I am referring to is both the historical method that produced it and specific readings where...
  20. L

    The "scriptures" are said to be "Given by the Inspiration of God", and I, therefore, say "The Bible we hold in our is Inspired."

    Erasmus and the other editors of Textus Receptus editions were textual critics. At times the Church of England makers of the KJV acted as textual critics. The KJV translators made some textual criticism decisions.
Top