Search results

Can the textual-varying imperfect printed editions of the Textus Receptus be reconciled with the interpretations and absolute assertions of KJV-only advocates concerning God's promises about the preservation of His words?

So what? There would be nothing wrong with choosing to post mostly on one subject, especially when it is the very important matter of doctrine concerning the Scriptures. It takes less time to post on one subject than on multiple subjects. Your comments are not on this forum's subject of...

You have it backwards as I disproved your bogus accusation.

I stated the truth while you bear false witness. I have posted on other topics at the Baptist Board, proving that you have not seen and read all my posts. I have posted several posts in the Political forum including under the topic entitled "Are these Democrat politicians radical and...

I care and think about all sound Bible doctrine, and I oppose all unsound false doctrine which includes modern, non-scriptural KJV-only teaching. Earnestly contending for the faith is not abnormal for believers. I do not only post about one topic as was incorrectly alleged. KJV-only author...

In his thread entitled "I Further Confess the modern critical Greek text of Scripture Can Not be Reconciled with God’s Promises about the Preservation of His Word," Alan Dale Gross quoted and posted the following, and it provides evidence that some seem to believe a fable or myth of an extant...

Jude 1:3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. Titus 1:9 Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been...

The proof is in my posts that there is nothing strange, abnormal, unhealthy, or weird in my sound efforts to present the truth concerning the important doctrine of the Scriptures in relation to Bible translations.

In one of his articles posted at your recommended website in review of H. D. Williams' book The Miracle of Inspiration, Thomas Ross wrote: "Assertions are not proof." Does Thomas Ross actually prove from the Scriptures that post-NT Bible translations have derivative inspiration or is his...

Gordon Clark asserted: “The English word inspiration with its prefix in gives the impression that after the Bible, or a book of the Bible, had been written, God breathed into it. However, the Greek word does not mean breathed into, it means breathed out. God breathed out the Scriptures” (God’s...

Are your seeming carnal smear tactics, negative name-calling, and personal attacks a sound argument? Your improper tactics do not answer nor refute my accurate statements. You are wrong to attack my honesty.

Peter Van Kleeck (Sr. and Jr.) claimed: “Now, for 420 years, the Authorized Version has stood undaunted as the derivatively inspired Word of God for English speaking people” (Theological Grounding for a Standard Sacred Text, p. 207). They asserted: “The derivative inspiration of the Authorized...

Is the Textus Receptus reading and KJV rendering "book of life" at Revelation 22:19 found in all extant preserved Greek New Testament manuscripts? Ron Minton maintained that the KJV followed the Latin Vulgate at Revelation 22:19 “where all known Greek manuscripts have ‘tree of life,’ but the...

Is the Textus Receptus reading at Revelation 17:8 found in extant preserved Greek New Testament manuscripts? KJV defender Edward F. Hills asserted: “The few typographical errors which still remain in the Textus Receptus of Revelation do not involve important readings” (KJV Defended, p. 202...

This writer fails to prove that there are hundreds of verses where they [Hodges-Farstad and Robinson-Pierpont texts] do not follow the reading of the majority of existing collated Greek NT manuscripts. KJV-only author J. A. Moorman asserted: “Von Soden did not collate anything approaching a...

Some or many TR defenders and KJV defenders sometimes seem to use and rely on the fallacy of composition in making their unproven, overgeneralized statements about the Textus Receptus, the KJV, and modern Bible translations. The opening post in this thread seems to involve use of the fallacy of...

You do not state the truth. I stated the truth concerning what I believe, and there is nothing "entirely dishonest" in that. I made no such assumption. I read what he posted to see what he himself says that he believes. This book entitled Thou Shalt Keep Them edited by Kent Brandenburg in...

You do not prove my accurate statements that I believe to be actual lies as you incorrectly assert. You bear false witness in clear disobedience to a command of God.

You fail to prove your incorrect assertion to be true from the Scriptures. My statement is not a demonic lie and heresy as you falsely allege.

An accusation was not assigned to you. The defined and accurate term KJV-only was presented as a correct description of some of your own stated reasoning in your posts. The accurate term was properly used concerning what you yourself state. This book entitled Thou Shalt Keep Them edited by...