Search results

The burden of proof rests on the person who makes the positive claim. You are using the fallacy of trying to reverse the burden of proof instead of backing up your own positive assertions. In every question the burden of proof lies on the side of the affirmative--in this case the KJV-only pure...

You have it backwards. The burden of proof rests on the person who makes the positive claim. You are trying to reverse the burden of proof instead of backing up your own positive assertions. In every question the burden of proof lies on the side of the affirmative--in this case the KJV-only...

You again demonstrate that you do not practice what you preach. You do not present the readings, the manuscripts, and the witnesses for your claims. You do not quote primary sources. You ask what you do not provide for your own claims. You seem to be making excuses for your failure to engage...

Wilbur Pickering wrote: "As a linguist (PhD) and one who has dabbled in the Bible translation process for some years, I affirm that a 'perfect' translation is impossible. (Indeed, a tolerably reasonable approximation is often difficult to achieve -- the semantic areas of the words simply do...

In the fourth edition of Frederick Scrivener's A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament edited by Edward Miller, this is stated concerning 1 John 5:7: "On the whole, therefore, we need not hesitate to declare our conviction that the disputed words were not written by St. John...

Jack Moorman is a KJV-only author, whose books have been published by D. A. Waite's Bible for Today and Dean Burgon Society. Moorman, Jack. Forever Settled: A Survey of the Documents and History of the Bible. Collingswood: The Bible for Today, n. d. Moorman, J. A. When the KJV Departs from the...

You try to substitute the incorrect label "quote stacking" as a diversion away from your lack of clear, consistent, sound, primary evidence for your unproven declarations. Perhaps your misinformed and non-primary impressions of your preserved stream are not substitutes for documentation. Are...

Do you practice what you preach since you seem to try to put words in my mouth with your inconsistent accusation of alleging that the best of me is bad or in effect alleging the worse in me? You do not demonstrate that I am putting words in the mouths of others. You do not demonstrate anything...

You have not provided primary source documentation for all your claims so you do not practice what you preach. Does that mean that there is a problem with your second-hand, third-hand, fourth-hand claims? Others have presented more primary first-hand quotations from the authors to which you...

The word of God is not degraded or demeaned by being translated into present-day Modern English. The word of God is not bound or limited to being translated into archaic Early Modern English.

My premises are what the Scriptures teach. My premises include the scriptural truths stated in these verses (Deut. 4:2, Deut. 12:32, Prov. 30:6, Rev. 22:18-19). Those scriptural truths do not fail or fall because you may choose to reject them. There is no need for me to revise my sound...

Your opinion is wrong. Your actual unproven points have been properly challenged and countered. The 1611 KJV is not a more sure word of prophecy than the preserved Scriptures in the original languages.

That seems to be all you offer. You try to substitute the label "quote stacking" as a diversion away from your lack of clear, consistent, sound evidence for your unproven declarations. Perhaps your misinformed impressions of your preserved stream are not substitutes for documentation. Are you...

You in effect claim that Burgon, Scrivner, Pickering, and van Bruggen support your particular non-scriptural position concerning a preserved stream, but you do not provide direct quotations that demonstrate that they actually do. Dean John William Burgon wrote: "Once for all, we request it may...

You have not demonstrated your assertions to be true. You have been given sound contextual evidence. You do not determine what evidence is valid for countering your unproven claims. Your claims remain assertions, not demonstrations.

You do not practice what you preach. You keep merely asserting your claims without demonstrating them to be true. Your argument has been soundly addressed regardless of your refusal to accept it. Verifiable facts and truth have been presented for you whether you accept it or not. You try to...

You fail to prove your claim concerning Conan's statements to be true. You did not prove Conan's statements about Burgon, Scrivener, Pickering, and van Bruggen to be "demonstrably false." You did not provide documented citations from those authors to back up what you alleged. You merely...

Did Alfred Martin suggest that the preserved text had some imperfections or faults or that it was faulty? Alfred Martin as edited by David Otis Fuller wrote: “The traditional text is not synonymous with the Received Text, but the latter does embody it in a rather corrupt form” (Which Bible...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/blasphemy-another-of-talarico-s-so-called-pastors-says-jesus-didn-t-die-for-her-sins-virgin-birth-is-pagan-myth/ar-AA2cVhcI?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6ab58c8da31947ff8b9d5a2f38f165e9&ei=10...

In the 2026 book entitled God's Word Is Not Bound: Copyright & the Stewardship of Scripture, Andrew Case wrote: "One of the common misconceptions about the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible is that it is a universally public domain work -- something many tout as a feature of its...