Search results

There are three Old Testament verses [Joshua 21:36-37; Nehemiah 7:68] that would prove that the KJV’s Old Testament was not based completely and solely on Ben Chayyim’s Hebrew Masoretic Text edition. J. Scott Porter maintained that “it [Joshua 21:36-37] is left out of the Rabbinical Bibles of...

This is another example of your diversion tactics and efforts to avoid the actual evidence. You only repeat your bogus diversionary tactics instead of engaging in serious discussion.

You only react to the sound evidence that exposes serious problems with your KJV-only "preserved stream" argument, but you do not prove your argument to be sound. You have been given specific textual evidence. You have not established your claims by sound verifiable evidence.

You are guilty of what you incorrectly accuse me. You are the one declaring. Your claims have been interacted with soundly. You close your eyes to the sound reasoning that counters your unsound argument. Sound evidence has demonstrated that you use an erroneous KJV-only "preserved stream"...

In your opening post in this thread, you appealed to sources. However, you failed to demonstrate that those sources support your claims. You simply try to dismiss and avoid evidence when it is presented. Specifics were provided in other posts. You do not engage in serious discussion...

Your unproven claims have been touched and countered. You are the one trying to declare without proof. Your content has been exposed as an erroneous attempt to dismiss or avoid the evidence. What you try to dismiss as "quote-shacking" is the presenting of documented evidence that exposes...

Concerning Joshua 2:1, Christian Ginsburg claimed: “Here the clause and the two young men came to Jericho is omitted because of the similar words and they came and they came. They are preserved in the Septuagint” (Introduction, p. 175). Wayne Mitchell also cited Joshua 2:1 as a place where the...

Your declaration does not make your point stand when specific textual evidence is found in the source Scribal Skips: 2000 Words that Fell Out of the Bible by Wayne Mitchell. That book identifies the readings and the witnesses that you try to dismiss. You appealed to sources with providing any...

That is what you are doing. You are the one declaring and not demonstrating. You are not engaging in serious discussion. You have replaced argument with your bogus tactic of dismissing the evidence by misrepresenting it as "quote stacking."

Your fallible human reasoning does not stand on its own. Your personal declaration does not make your statement true.

Perhaps you present the slogan and fable without convincing evidence or without proof. Perhaps you also present a strawman misrepresentation since you do not accurately present the views of those who may disagree with your unproven claims. You fail to present accurately all the particulars and...

Quotations from the writings of John William Burgon would affirm that Glenn Conjurske accurately presented or described the view of Burgon. Dean John William Burgon wrote: "Once for all, we request it may be clearly understood that we do not, by any means, claim perfection for the Received...

Perhaps you have it backwards at least as far as your own posts show. You seem to be the one who tries to hide instability and omissions found in your assumed preserved stream. You merely try to dismiss the evidence and verifiable facts by smearing them as supposed "quote stacking." You are...

You are trying to dismiss the truth again. You do not answer or refute the observations of Baptist pastor Glenn Conjurske, who was a strong defender of the KJV and a critic of modern versions.

Your merely declare your unproven claims to have "source grounding" without proving it to be true. You fail to prove your way is "the [only] proper way." You seem to have become your own authority. You do not provide clarity by trying to dismiss the clear evidence that conflicts with your...

Your own assertion could apply to your opening post in this thread. You provided no quotes from your claimed sources that actually agree with your points.

You are conflating the Peshitta with your preserved stream with it differs more with it than English Bible translations such as the NKJV do. You fail to prove your point to be true, and you merely try to dismiss the verifiable facts that conflict with or that contradict your unproven claims.

If the Peshitta is part of your preserved stream, why are English Bible translations of the Peshitta also not included? Does the Peshitta actually have all "the same readings that later appear in the Greek manuscripts used by the KJV translators"? Terry Falla wrote: "Though given in printed...

KJV-only author Terence McLean claimed that “the Bible of the true Christians never cross-pollinated with the corrupted texts until the nineteenth century” (History of Your Bible, p. 33). Paul Devine asserted: “You can’t mix these streams and call them both ‘God’s Word’” (Why Your Bible Is a...

Perhaps the truth is sometimes too strong for you. God has not given believers a spirit of fear of the truth. I have not objected to you using the KJV only.