Search results

HI, Shawn ! The KJVO myth is man-made & phony as a Ford Corvette. First, where does the KJV itself support the KJVO myth ? Next, how about its proven translational goofs, such as "Easter" in Acts 12:4 ? Third, what new revelation does the KJV have that's not in its predecessor, the Geneva version?

What's a "KJB"? A Russian minefield race ? And proven goofs DO occur in the KJV.

I believe the early KJVO authors were going with wrong info, while the later ones have placed the old garbage into a new, whitewashed dumpster. However, it's still the same old garbage, phony as a Ford Corvette.

Who does "whoever" exclude? Who, among living people, is excluded, no matter what? Did Jesus ever turn away anyone who truly sought to be saved by Him?

It's simple-CALVINISM IS FALSE ! In Scripture, Jesus often said "whoever", but ont one "whoever if elect".

Scriprure shows Jesus was born while Quirinius was Roman governor of Judea. He left that office in 6 BC. That makes the passover in question in 27 AD.

"Them" is the sheep, plain n simple !

So, please tell me, who or what else could "them" be?

Everyone alive is eligible for salvation. Coming to Jesus in belief and obedience is the key.

None of this can cover the FACT that Easter didn't exist when Luke wrote "Acts", and if it had, neither the Jews nor Herod would've observed it, & the Jews wouldn't've left off dealing with Peter because it was ongoing. However, they certainly would, and DID because PASSOVER was ongoing. In all...

They're both wrong.

You cannot disprove the fact that "Easter" in Acts 12:4 is a goof; therefore the KJV isn't the WHOLE, UNADULTERATED word of God. It has man-made additions & changes not found in its sources. Acts 12:4 is just one of many. You're stuck with that fact, and therefore wanna change the subject.

The actual WOG cannot have errors, but the man-made KJV can, and DOES ! To insist the KJV is the ONLY valid English Bible translation is wrong and not-too-bright.

You're admitting to believing proven errors.

So, you believe the KJV's goofs, such as "Easter" in Acts 12:4 and the ADDITION of the phrase "and shalt be" in Rev. 16:5?

Please show us some Scripture that supports the KJVO myth. Without any Scriptural support, the KJVO myth is false.

Well, let's see. Jack Chick's crew is still around, but their memes are getting so ridiculous that few, if any, Christians believe them any more. Moorman and Melton are still kicking. Kizziah has been largely discredited. For years, Will Kinney has been hawking the KJVO myth, but he's fast...

For one thing, I'm tired of it. You're not gonna change mi belief, nor will I change yours. God has always condemned marriage between full siblings, & that's THAT !

Yes, it IS. Easter didn't exist when Luke wrote "Acts" and if it had, neither Herod nor the Jews would've observed it. There are several articles in this forum dealing with that issue.

God has always looked down on marrying one's full sibling, so YOU tell os where Cain got his wife. YOU brought this jive up in this thread, not I, so YOU explain it.