David J - Menageriekeeper is a woman and she is not the liberal that you interpreted her to be. She has a definite moral code for her children to follow. She didn't mean any harm to you.
Bro. James Reed - Perhaps I intimated that the age difference was all about sex, but I didn't mean to do that. My mother was 18 and my father was 22 when they married in 1959. 4 years difference. No big deal.
But in 2005-2006, the difference between 14 and 18 is vast, primarily because of the 14-year-old. A girl that young should not a steady boyfriend 18 or older. In fact, she should not have a steady boyfriend period when she is 14. For many reasons, not just the obvious.
Nate - You will understand this later in life. I see nothing wrong with a 17-year-old boy going to the movies a few times with a 15-year-old girl. But an 18-year-old young man who is in a relationship (be it sexual or platonic) with a 14-year-old girl to the extent that he is part of the "family" gives me the willies.
17 and 15? Just hanging out? That's fine.
18 and 14? In a relationship? I don't think it's healthy.
El Guero - I didn't mean to sound flippant. But entire generations of these girls knew when they were 8,9, and 10 years old that they didn't have much time left. 4 years? 5 years? Then they would be forced to marry sometimes much older men whom their fathers arranged for them. That's what I meant by "bred" for it.
Peace everyone -
Scarlett O.
<><
Bro. James Reed - Perhaps I intimated that the age difference was all about sex, but I didn't mean to do that. My mother was 18 and my father was 22 when they married in 1959. 4 years difference. No big deal.
But in 2005-2006, the difference between 14 and 18 is vast, primarily because of the 14-year-old. A girl that young should not a steady boyfriend 18 or older. In fact, she should not have a steady boyfriend period when she is 14. For many reasons, not just the obvious.
Nate - You will understand this later in life. I see nothing wrong with a 17-year-old boy going to the movies a few times with a 15-year-old girl. But an 18-year-old young man who is in a relationship (be it sexual or platonic) with a 14-year-old girl to the extent that he is part of the "family" gives me the willies.
17 and 15? Just hanging out? That's fine.
18 and 14? In a relationship? I don't think it's healthy.
El Guero - I didn't mean to sound flippant. But entire generations of these girls knew when they were 8,9, and 10 years old that they didn't have much time left. 4 years? 5 years? Then they would be forced to marry sometimes much older men whom their fathers arranged for them. That's what I meant by "bred" for it.
Peace everyone -
Scarlett O.
<><