Bartholomew said
I still do not think you have shown us from the text why the "us" who will perish (if they don't repent) are unbelivers. Rather, the whole context surely demands that they are believers, and I therefore think my premise that believers may perish must stand.
I didn't say they are unbeleivers - quite the reverse. My point was that 'us' are the elect, and the text is saying God is not willing that any of them would perish. THEREFORE He holds back the Day of Judgement until every last one of them is saved.
I totally disagree. How can the "may" refer to the present world? The text says, "Wherefore we labour, that, whether present or absent, we may be accepted of him." Obviously, the possibility of not being accepted is there, whether present OR absent! Also check out the context, and you'll see the reason why we might not be accepted is because God is going to judge our works!
'May' can be conditional for the present without being so when present with the Lord, as the text can naturally be understood as saying that we labour to be accepted of Him in the present life even as we will when we are with Him.
The judgement is of us based on our works, i.e., our lives will declare the reality of our faith. So I regard this judgement as no different from the judgement mentioned in Matt.25 - the General Judgement. The eternal state of two sorts of men are confirmed, not a temporary discipline of erring believers.
The age to come is the millennial Kingdom of God. Rev 20 makes this clear, as does Jesus in all his references to the Kingdom of God/Kingdom of Heaven. Hebrews is also all about this kingdom.
The kingdom of God is not a millenial kingdom where saint and sinner mingle: 1 Cor.6: 9Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals,[1] nor sodomites, 10nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.
The kingdom of which the Lord speaks, and to which Hebrews refers, is an unshakeable kingdom, not one culminating in world-wide rebellion.
The symbolism of Revelation cannot be made to override the plain teachings of the rest of Scripture. Any difficulties we have in reconciling them must allow that the symbolic meaning is to conform with the plain teaching, not the other way around.
As for those who came out of Egypt, notice: 1. They were redeemed by the blood of a lamb,
This and the other points you listed fail to understand that Israel the nation was NOT redeemed in the crucial spiritual sense. It was typically redeemed, but only those of Abraham's faith actually were redeemed. The whole system of the Law typified the righteousness of Christ and His atonement. It did not actually save anyone (as I'm sure you agree). So the unbelievers who fell inthe desert are types of the unbelievers who will fall on the Day of Judgement, not of erring believers who will be chastised for a time.
The salvation in Rom 13:11 is something future; somehting that the saved don't currently possess. I think it is similar in Hebrews.
Yes, but only because we are not in our resurrection bodies yet. Not because this salvation has not already begun in us.
Yes it will be burned... but will it be utterly annihilated? Notice Rev 20, when it talks about the final end of the universe, talks about it "fleeing away" because there was no place left for it. It doesn't just burn. Actually, the context supports this, because verses 5 and 6 just compared this to Noah's flood, which wreaked havoc with water, but yet did not mean there was no earth left to repopulate. Notice also that the emphasis seems to be on performing enduring works (as per Matt 6:19-20), rather than works of this world, which will burn up (as per 1 Cor 3).
Yes, 'burn' does not exhaust the description. But it is certainly not the continuance of the present heavens and earth. It is a NEW heavens and a NEW earth, where righteous dwells - not where it co-exists with evil but suppressed hearts. Yes also, evil and foolish works of men will be utterly consumed, just as the present corrupted heavens and earth.
1. It doesn't say this new heaven and earth follows directly after Christ's return - it simply says we look for it.
An awful big ommission, if this millenium is the subject of all the kingdom of God references you mentioned.
2. Even if it does follow directly after His return, it may still not be the final new heaven and earth, but may refer to the millennium. After all, Isaiah 65:17 talks about a "new heavens and a new earth", and yet verse 20 tells us there will be death there, and also accursed sinners. Obviouly, then, this can't be the "new heaven and new earth" of Rev 21, so must be something else. And I suggest that, just like 2 Peter 3 above, it's talking about the millennium.
Two New Heavens and New Earths! I think the difficulty millenialism throws up can be resolved if we remember the typical nature of a lot of OT prophecy. Isaiah 60:19,20 for example, speaks of God's people no longer needing the sun or moon for light, for God will be that for them. Yet it is given in a context similar to your millenium. But the description is of the eternal state as expressed in Rev.21:22ff.
In Him
Ian
I still do not think you have shown us from the text why the "us" who will perish (if they don't repent) are unbelivers. Rather, the whole context surely demands that they are believers, and I therefore think my premise that believers may perish must stand.
I didn't say they are unbeleivers - quite the reverse. My point was that 'us' are the elect, and the text is saying God is not willing that any of them would perish. THEREFORE He holds back the Day of Judgement until every last one of them is saved.
I totally disagree. How can the "may" refer to the present world? The text says, "Wherefore we labour, that, whether present or absent, we may be accepted of him." Obviously, the possibility of not being accepted is there, whether present OR absent! Also check out the context, and you'll see the reason why we might not be accepted is because God is going to judge our works!
'May' can be conditional for the present without being so when present with the Lord, as the text can naturally be understood as saying that we labour to be accepted of Him in the present life even as we will when we are with Him.
The judgement is of us based on our works, i.e., our lives will declare the reality of our faith. So I regard this judgement as no different from the judgement mentioned in Matt.25 - the General Judgement. The eternal state of two sorts of men are confirmed, not a temporary discipline of erring believers.
The age to come is the millennial Kingdom of God. Rev 20 makes this clear, as does Jesus in all his references to the Kingdom of God/Kingdom of Heaven. Hebrews is also all about this kingdom.
The kingdom of God is not a millenial kingdom where saint and sinner mingle: 1 Cor.6: 9Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals,[1] nor sodomites, 10nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.
The kingdom of which the Lord speaks, and to which Hebrews refers, is an unshakeable kingdom, not one culminating in world-wide rebellion.
The symbolism of Revelation cannot be made to override the plain teachings of the rest of Scripture. Any difficulties we have in reconciling them must allow that the symbolic meaning is to conform with the plain teaching, not the other way around.
As for those who came out of Egypt, notice: 1. They were redeemed by the blood of a lamb,
This and the other points you listed fail to understand that Israel the nation was NOT redeemed in the crucial spiritual sense. It was typically redeemed, but only those of Abraham's faith actually were redeemed. The whole system of the Law typified the righteousness of Christ and His atonement. It did not actually save anyone (as I'm sure you agree). So the unbelievers who fell inthe desert are types of the unbelievers who will fall on the Day of Judgement, not of erring believers who will be chastised for a time.
The salvation in Rom 13:11 is something future; somehting that the saved don't currently possess. I think it is similar in Hebrews.
Yes, but only because we are not in our resurrection bodies yet. Not because this salvation has not already begun in us.
Yes it will be burned... but will it be utterly annihilated? Notice Rev 20, when it talks about the final end of the universe, talks about it "fleeing away" because there was no place left for it. It doesn't just burn. Actually, the context supports this, because verses 5 and 6 just compared this to Noah's flood, which wreaked havoc with water, but yet did not mean there was no earth left to repopulate. Notice also that the emphasis seems to be on performing enduring works (as per Matt 6:19-20), rather than works of this world, which will burn up (as per 1 Cor 3).
Yes, 'burn' does not exhaust the description. But it is certainly not the continuance of the present heavens and earth. It is a NEW heavens and a NEW earth, where righteous dwells - not where it co-exists with evil but suppressed hearts. Yes also, evil and foolish works of men will be utterly consumed, just as the present corrupted heavens and earth.
1. It doesn't say this new heaven and earth follows directly after Christ's return - it simply says we look for it.
An awful big ommission, if this millenium is the subject of all the kingdom of God references you mentioned.
2. Even if it does follow directly after His return, it may still not be the final new heaven and earth, but may refer to the millennium. After all, Isaiah 65:17 talks about a "new heavens and a new earth", and yet verse 20 tells us there will be death there, and also accursed sinners. Obviouly, then, this can't be the "new heaven and new earth" of Rev 21, so must be something else. And I suggest that, just like 2 Peter 3 above, it's talking about the millennium.
Two New Heavens and New Earths! I think the difficulty millenialism throws up can be resolved if we remember the typical nature of a lot of OT prophecy. Isaiah 60:19,20 for example, speaks of God's people no longer needing the sun or moon for light, for God will be that for them. Yet it is given in a context similar to your millenium. But the description is of the eternal state as expressed in Rev.21:22ff.
In Him
Ian