DeafPosttrib in post #128 here said:
...
Nothing in Dna. 9:24-27 suggest that there will be future 'seven year of tribulation period'. This passage is discuss about the prophecy of coming Messiah, and calvary, & new covenant. It already fulfilled 490 years later after the book of Daniel was penned.
In Christ
Rev. 22:20 -Amen!
This passage (Dan. 9:26-27) is discuss about the prophecy
of coming Messiah, and calvary, & new covenant.
It already fulfilled 490 years later after
the book of Daniel was penned.
The passage Dan. 9:26-27 does speak of Messiah. It speaks
not of anything else you say. The two characters in Dan 9:26-27
are 'Messiah the Princ' (Jesus) and 'The Prince who Shall Come'
(Antichrist in other passages). Unfortunately, the error of your
logical assumption here equates Messiah with Anti-Messiah;
Jesus the Good (Christ) with pure evil (AntiChrist)
Nothing in Dna. 9:24-27 suggest that there will be future 'seven year of tribulation period'.
This is correct. However, it does speak of
'one seven' or 'one week' which is seven years.
I logically assume that the Tribulation Period is
the Seven Year long (70th week of Daniel) and
don't end up calling evil good in error here in Daniel 9:26-27.
There are 7 passages in Daniel & Revelation that that
speak of the two halfs of the 70th week of Daniel.
Even Messiah Jesus spake of what it says in Daniel 9:26-27.
Here is what Messiah Jesus said answering the Disciples
Question " ... and what shall be the signe of thy coming? ... "
(Matthew 24:3b, KJV1611 Edition)
Matthew 24:15-21 (KJV1611 Edition):
When yee therefore shall see the abomination of desolation,
spoken of by Daniel the Prophet, stand in the holy place,
(who so readeth, let him vnderstand.)
16 Then let them which be in Iudea, flee into the mountaines.
17 Let him which is on the house top,
not come downe, to take any thing out of his house:
18 Neither let him which is in the field,
returne backe to take his clothes.
19 And wòe vnto them that are with child,
and to them that giue sucke in those dayes.
20 But pray yee that your flight bee not
in the winter, neither on the Sabbath day:
21 For then shall be great tribulation,
such as was not since the beginning
of the world to this time, no, nor euer shall be.
Note Jesus does not say:
// When yee therefore shall see the
abomination of desolation,
spoken of by Daniel the Prophet,
STOOD UP BY ME
in the holy place, ... //
I think if Jesus (the Messiah) was going to commit the
abomination of desolation (AoD) that He would have
told us. Both 'adomination' and 'desolation' have
negative connotations of evil not postitive connotations
of good. I just can't see Messiah Jesus who is the very
essence of God committing an abomonination
Sorry 'Prince Messiah' and 'the Prince who will come'
who does the Abomination shall be two different people.
Making this wrong logical assumption means that nearly all
the logic following is also wrong (though some of could
accidentally be correct).
I know that some people will make bad assumptions like
this then deny them blaming God by using:
//That why, I stick with Early Church fathers' teachings,
and also, follow what the Bible saying than
what today's men's teaching Col. 2:8).//
Col 2:7-8 (KJV1611 Edition):
Rooted and built vp in him, and stablished in the faith,
as yee haue bene taught, abounding therein with thankesgiuing.
8
Beware lest any man spoile you through
Philosophie and vaine deceit, after the tradition
of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ:
I know you were taught the truth by your early mentors:
pretribulation rapture2 -- why didn't you stay
faithful?
The error logical assumption (false axiom) that Jesus
commits the AoD (abomination of Desolation) is one
of the vain deceit philosophies that lead to the error
of 'post-trib resurrection2 only' and a-mill.
