Me4Him: //Take a look at these charts, and notice the "Sequence"
is the same in both charts and follow the exact sequence
of the Feast days, but that would only be important if
you understood the rituals of the feast days, which
are "FORSHADOWS" of the Events in the NT.//
Amen, Brother Me4Him -- Preach it!
Do not be discouraged for they who only drag their feet
also serve the Lord - they are called 'BREAKS'
Seriously, some will say you change the WORD OF GOD by making
it plain for anybody to understand. The professional
profit prophets need things to be discouraging and complex
and mysterious so they can explain them for profit
Me4Him: //The Trib is Israel's "Day of Atonement" for rejecting Jesus, but
Jesus has already made atonement for the church, (believers)
therefore we "PASSOVER" the trib.//
Amen, Brother Me4Him - you are so RIGHT ON!
Me4Him: //As the "Passover lamb", Jesus only protects
the "FIRSTBORN", or "FIRSTFRUIT". (believers)
Amen, Brother Me4Him - Preach it!
BobRyan: //But those who seek to slice/dice/chop-and-toss the timeline into
disconnected chunks obliterate ALL references to Christ from WITHIN
the timeline.//
quote:
---
Ed said
False assumptions:
---
BobRyan: //Nice "claim" Now all you had to do was to show ONE act
of the Messiah MENTIONED IN the text that you left
IN the 490 year timeline.//
Feel free to show from Daniel 9:26-27 the acts you attribute to
the Messiah.
I see one act of the Messiah in Daniel 9:26-27:
"And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off,
but not for himself:"
And then the rest of Daniel 9:26-27 speaks NOT of the Messiah whom we know
to be fulfilled in Jesus.
I believe that Daniel 8:23-27 is a prophecy of the physical/literal
Antichrist. Somebody want to shout AMEN! ?
Here is what is NOT about the Messiah in Daniel 9:26-27:
-a prince will come
is this Messiah the prince or 'a king of fierce countenance'? (Daniel 8:23)
- the people of the prince will destroy the holy city (Jerusalem)
and the sanctuary (Temple on the Temple mount).
If this is Messiah the Prince, His people are the Jews.
Did the Jews destroy Jerusalem and the sanctuary?
No, Rome destroyed the Temple in 70AD.
So this prince is, not the Messiah Prince, but is an evil prince
(King of the North in Chapter 11).
- and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end
of the war desolations are determined.
Sorry folks, this sounds nothing like when Stephen was stoned (some a-mills)
but was similar in TYPE to the destruction in 70AD of the Temple.
(Rome also destroyed Jerusalem in 135AD.)
From 70AD until the Roman Empire no longer existed
the site of the Temple was trod upon by the Gentiles.
A Roman armies made their home base on the Temple Mount.
Then we get to the 'he' doings. There are two choices to resolve
the pronouns 'he':
A. Messiah the prince
B. the prince whose people destroyed the Temple and Jerusalem
Let us see what 'he' does:
- he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week;
I hear folk saying 'he' is Messiah the Prince.
Note for the KJV: in verse 25 it is '
Messiah the
Prince'
(note capital 'M' capital 'P').
Note in verse 26 it is '
Messiah' (note the capital 'M')
Note in verse 26 about the evil prince it is small letter 'p'
prince. The KJV translators put the capital letters in.
I think they mean that MESSIAH THE PRINCE, my Beloved Lord Jesus,
is IMPORTANT and the evil prince is NOT IMPORTANT.
Our Beloved Lord Jesus is our Lord and Savior, the evil prince
is a stick in the mud.
I hear folks saying 'he' confirms a covenant.
The Lord Jesus (Messiah the Prince) makes the New Covenant
which was foretold in the Old Testament (OT). But the New Covenent
is NOT a 7-year covenent - the New Covenent is an Eternal Covenent
which never needs confirmation.
I believe this first 'he' in Daniel 9:27
is the evil prince NOT the King of Kings.
-in the midst of the week, he shall cause the the sacrifice
and the oblation to cease
Here is the second 'he' which can be the evil prince (AKA: Antichrist)
or the Messiah the Prince.
Well, my Lord and Savior, Messiah the Prince, brought a halt to
the daily sacrifice and the daily oblation - in the spiritual relm -
by giving the perfect sacrifice. In the physical relm it was
the Romans stopped the daily oblation and the daily sacrifice.
By contrast, some day when the Antichrist walks among us, shall
in the Middle of the 70th Week of Daniel go into the restored temple
(the first half of the week is plenty of time to build the temple)
and declare himself as being God and end the daily oblation
and the daily sacrifice. So this doing is a toss-up: could be Jesus,
could be Antichrist.
-in the midst of the week he shall cause ... the overspreading of
abominations
-he shall make it desolate, even unti the consummation,
and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
This third 'he' commits the Abomination of Desolation (AOD).
Sorry, but if Messiah the Prince Jesus has of been planning on
committing the AOD himself, then i think he had every opportunity
to TELL US in Matthew 24:15. Instead, Jesus (MESSIAH THE PRINCE)
says when you see the AOD standing in the Temple,
if you are in Judea - flee to the mountians.
I just cannot see my Jesus, my Lord and Savior, constructing something
in the temple called the Abomination of Desolation (AOD) that will
cause somebody to flee to the mountains. Therefore the
second 'he' in Daniel 9:27 must be the evil prince NOT the Prince of Peace.
The thirst 'he' in Daniel 9:27 must be the evil prince and NOT the
Prince of Peace.
Now, what you think Jesus did to fulfill the prophecy of Daniel 9:26b-27?