<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by DHK:
"You must be an atheist trolling as a theist. I keep hearing the phrase "true christian", but the only people I see that are truly christians, never call themselves that.
The dichotomy of education and religion is hardly a bad thing.
When one goes to school, they learn about biology, algebra, history. There is no where for religion to be placed in, nor is it necessary. When students are taught about the gravitational constant, they aren't taught that no god created it that way."
---They are in our school. (God created gravity not evolution)
Well, at least by your posts I can see who the atheist is. Have you taken a look into the home- schooling forum yet? How about the creation/evolution forum? You might want to check them out.
If "the dichotomy of education and religion is hardly a bad thing," why are Christian schools continuing to open and increase in attendance, while public school attendance declines and in some areas schools have to be shut down? Why are so many Christian parents so concerned about their children's education that they either home-school their children from kindergarten onward, or pull their children out of public school once they see the harmful effects of humanism, evolution, drugs, violence, etc.? Humanism and evolution walk hand in hand with each other. Huxley himself said that he believed in evolution "not because it was credible, but because belief in God was far too incredible." It is an atheistic position that is being promoted in education: biology, social studies (anthropology), even history, and still others all taught from the all pervasive evolutionary point of view--not because it is true, but because it is politically correct. Again in courses that involve ethics, sex education, the social sciences--if it feels good it. I almost laugh at your statement,
"Schooling is for the teaching of absolutes. Church is for the teaching of metaphysics."
Some years ago the minister of education here boldly stated, "The only absolute is that there are no absolutes." That is the humanist lie, right out of the textbook. That's what they are teaching your (the American) children. They teach there is no right and wrong. Everything is relative. Situation ethics is the common theme. Whereas in contradistinction the Bible is a book of absolutes. Far from teaching "metaphysics," it teaches the ten commandments--the difference between right and wrong.
It teaches about the origin of the universe, and it can because there was someone to observe it--God!
True science is knowledge gained by observation, then classified in an orderly fashion. True science must have an observer. With evolution there was and is no observer. Don't call it science. It is scientism--taught in your schools.
I love America. It was and is a nation that was founded on Christian principles. Its constitution and laws are based on Christian principles. But that does not make the nation a Christian nation. It is far from "Christian." There is no such thing as a Christian nation.
DHK<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
That was an impressive method of ducking what I presented, especially the reference I added on the history of the US being strictly Christian based.
But I transgress and will now comment on what you did decide to post on. You know, I find it very humorous that you keep on bringing up evolution in the discussion of secular education. You do realize that teachers in public schools aren't allowed to teach evolution directly. I wasn't taught it, I was taught the various humanoids that preceeded us, however, evolution wasn't never mentioned in class. To go even further, what are you talking about with drugs and violence in public schools? Are you suggesting that the "secularist" schools encourage the use of drugs and the means of violence? The school I went to strongly condemned violence and drug education started in late elementary school, that is the BAD drugs, nevermind the anti-smoking agenda. I just don't understand where you are coming from saying something like that.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR> It is an atheistic position that is being promoted in education: biology, social studies (anthropology), even history, and still others all taught from the all pervasive evolutionary point of view--not because it is true, but because it is politically correct. Again in courses that involve ethics, sex education, the social sciences--if it feels good it. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
You know, the majority of people in this country are believers in God. I didn't notice one person change their belief because what they were taught in school. I'd like to know about history how humanism has struck there. You seem to have a weak understanding of the history of the United States, not even knowing its heavily founded Christian roots that bloomed into the hyprocrisy and desolation that led to the manifest destiny and the slaughter and detainment of too many races.
As to social sciences and sex education, what the heck are you talking about. "If it feels good..."? Sex education is taught so that people are educated about sex and all of its consequences from pregnancy to STD's. You know, STD's are no where to be found in the bible. Granted, parents should be teaching their own children this information, however, teachers with a deeper knowledge on the science and know what are myths and what aren't is a very excellent supplement to what the parents should already be teaching their kids. Having two sources for one subject is never a bad thing. As to suggesting sex education promotes sexual activity, you must be either very sheltered or extremely naive. My grandfather was grand on saying, "It's like you people thought you invented sex or something." The "sexual appetite" of teenagers today is no less different than that of 50 or 100 or 400 years ago. By educating children, they can be kept away from being unnecessarily endangered from ****** mistakes that young adults can make. Teaching abstenance is worthless. It disregards the science of it all and it regards a history of abstinence that never existed in the first place.
As for social sciences, "if it feels good." Where the heck are you going with that?
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>"Schooling is for the teaching of absolutes. Church is for the teaching of metaphysics." - Me<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
The Earth revolves around the Sun.
1 + 1 = 2
An acid turns blue litmus paper red.
The country was declared independant on 1776.
Please stop me when I mention something as an absolute that isn't true.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>They teach there is no right and wrong. Everything is relative. Situation ethics is the common theme. Whereas in contradistinction the Bible is a book of absolutes. Far from teaching "metaphysics," it teaches the ten commandments--the difference between right and wrong. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
The ten commandments?! Only the last five deal with actions regarding other people. The bible says that slavery is cool, should schools teach that? As for ethics, that's a parent thing right? You don't seem to want to teach you children anything. Let the school do it all for you. Geesh, if you need the bible to tell you killing is wrong, then why even bother living at all. Your value system is corrupt on its own.
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR> It teaches about the origin of the universe, and it can because there was someone to observe it--God!
True science is knowledge gained by observation, then classified in an orderly fashion. True science must have an observer. With evolution there was and is no observer. Don't call it science. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
The origin of the universe in the bible? Surely you jest. NO WHERE IN THE BIBLE, will it tell you where or when the earth originated. In the beginning, the earth was already there. Now if you do not give creedence to the big bang, or rather big expansion theory, that is your choice. However, I strong doubt that you have given any serious thought to the theory. Nor have you looked at any of the recent evidence given by the CMB research. Nor have you really studied the bible, for if you had, you'd know when the first story of creation was written, who it was written by, the form in which it was written, and why it was written. A true believer scrutinizes their own beliefs. This is how their beliefs become stronger. However, I don't think you have either scrutinized your own beliefs, but not even the ones you hold so firmly and arrogently against.
As to evolution, you know, I don't recall defending evolution. Why are you saying I have? Again, as for evolution, it isn't taught in public schools. I don't know where you are getting that from!
Christian principles? Please explain Article 1, Section 2, mainly the 3/5 compromise part on counting the number of people per state to determine legislatures. Was the manifest destiny the glory of Christ?