So you kill him for that?
Nope. But I also don't judge a cop in a moment of danger like this. Personally, I would have attempted to shoot the armed assailant in the legs when he turned towards me with the tazer.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
So you kill him for that?
Nope. But I also don't judge a cop in a moment of danger like this. Personally, I would have attempted to shoot the armed assailant in the legs when he turned towards me with the tazer.
That goes back to Korea when my dad was on MP duty guarding a AWOL prisoner attempting an escape. Dad shot him in the lower extremities.As I stated above, disabling violent fleeing criminals was common police practice in the past and IMO still should be.
Oh yeah? When was that?As I stated above, disabling violent fleeing criminals was common police practice in the past and IMO still should be.
I heard from a former FBI agent on cable news that the training is to use deadly force if someone attempts to taze you. The reason being that if immobilized they can go for your gun.
So you kill him for that?
Why was he shot?
Perhaps the torso and head targets on the range could be replaced with leg targets.
The video shows the cop drawing his weapon after the man turns and fires at him.So you kill him for that?
It does seem to me the policy has changed. The shooting of and abusive manhandling of people (of all colors) trying to resist or get away is not like it was when I was a teenager. I speak from experience having ran from the cops countless times, used to look them in the face and tell I was going to run if they tried to arrest me for curfew and that there was noting they could do to stop me and that they wouldn't be able to catch me with a smurk on my face (I was a champion wrestler, could run a 6 mile and could hop a 5' fence with a one hand touch). I used to hate cops and hang out with a group of guys that would throw grapefruit at their cars from the alley as a sport to get them to chase us, etc. Today, I have little doubt that they would shoot me for my antics!Oh yeah? When was that?
When did the policy change? Why was it changed?
We were trained that due to the ability to immobilize and disable, pepper spray and tazer can justify deadly force.The tazer is non-lethal alternative to firearms. It will immobilize most people, though it doesn’t work on everyone.
The training the officer received will be crucial in this case. If he had been trained to consider a stolen tazer as a weapon justifying lethal force and followed that training, he will not face charges, imo
peace to you
Only problem is training is to shoot in the chest. We are specifically trained not to shoot at arms and legs.Nope. But I also don't judge a cop in a moment of danger like this. Personally, I would have attempted to shoot the armed assailant in the legs when he turned towards me with the tazer.
They let you go becausec hey didnt want to deal with juvenile court.It does seem to me the policy has changed. The shooting of and abusive manhandling of people (of all colors) trying to resist or get away is not like it was when I was a teenager. I speak from experience having ran from the cops countless times, used to look them in the face and tell I was going to run if they tried to arrest me for curfew and that there was noting they could do to stop me and that they wouldn't be able to catch me with a smurk on my face (I was a champion wrestler, could run a 6 mile and could hop a 5' fence with a one hand touch). I used to hate cops and hang out with a group of guys that would throw grapefruit at their cars from the alley as a sport to get them to chase us, etc. Today, I have little doubt that they would shoot me for my antics!
In fact, there was one instance, when I was 17, where they grabbed me in a parking lot for curfew and 5 cops wrestled with me for over 10 minutes to try to cuff me and put me in the car. When they finally got me in I was bleeding from my mouth, nose, hands, knees and especially my wrist from pivoting on the asphalt and after sitting in the car for about 15 minutes they let me out! That was a surprise, but I always figured it was because I was a juvenile that was looking really beat up and they didn't want answer for or be held responsible for the condition I was in over a curfew charge. Again, today I think my actions may very well had lead to my serious injury or even death.
I could tell many stories that would seem unbelievable today that I would still be alive.
IMO, things have changed.
Why did he resist arrest, assault the police, take a policeman's stun weapon, and point the policeman's stun weapon at the policeman?
If I was a white cop right now I would think twice about how I responded to a black man in this type of situation. Is it worth it to maybe have my career ended and face legal charges if the situation escalates? Nope, I don't think so. Let the drunk run off and get him later as we have his car and his personal information. Oh, and when you go to get him, make sure it's black police officers who go to do the takedown.
What is supposed to be the distinction between liberty and freedom?I'm surprised no one brought attention to what has to be an unreal statement given what police are paid and how overworked I hear they are.
"Police officers are the only job in this country where they can take your life, liberty and freedom," Stewart said. "It's the most powerful job in the country."If police officers are more powerful and skilled than doctors, I mean what does that portend about the future of police? What education, training, certification, and compensation are required?
He went on to compare police officers to lawyers and doctors. He argued that police must be held up to the standard of an Attorney or doctor from now on.
Perhaps the torso and head targets on the range could be replaced with leg targets.
I dont like the taser. I see it as a liability. Once you draw it, you have to keep it secured. If carrying it in a regular holster, you have to keep it secured when not drawn.There's a good chance the officer would be disciplined, possibly even suspended for losing his taser.