People don't have to be perfect, no. But they should at least acknowledge their sins. I'd rather have a pastor who was openly addicted to stealing then one who was obviously addicted to it but was in denial. (That isn't to say I would want either of them to be my pastor, but if I had to choose one of them I would prefer the one who was not in denial).
The problem I see with Falwell is that he seemed to be in denial of the problem of the sin in general, and perhaps even in himself (if he was a glutton, something I can't judge for sure). "According to a 1998 Purdue University study, obesity is associated with higher levels of religious participation. (Broken down by creed, Southern Baptists have the highest body-mass index on average, Catholics are in the middle, and Jews and other non-Christians are the lowest.) When this finding was brought to the attention of the Reverend Jerry Falwell, he was unperturbed. "I know gluttony is a bad thing," Falwell said. "But I don't know many gluttons."" ( from
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2003/11/23/the_deadliest_sin/ )
I mean come on! That's like going to an AA meeting where half the people have liver disease and saying I don't see many alcoholics (or drunkards). Seriously!
I just don't see the "eat until you barf, then eat some more" definition of gluttony in the Bible. If that is what Falwell believed, then he was being a bit hypocritical when demanding literal interpretation of the Scriptures on other points. Throwing up is never associated with the definition of gluttony. I think the obvious, simple definition of both gluttony and "drunkard" is "eat too much" and "drink too much". How much is too much is the question.
I would think it is obvious that if you're increasing your chance for liver diseases, you're drinking too much. If your increasing your chance of heart attack (obesity) then you're probably eating too much. And as was pointed out very by tinytim, a lot of it is quality more then quantity. Butter gets you toward "glutton" faster then carrots or chicken... just like whiskey gets you toward "drunkard" faster then wine or beer.
That Falwell said what he is quoted above as saying is sad on the one hand (it makes Christians look like fools in denial of a terrible problem) but on the other hand it gives me hope that the big fella ended up in heaven. The Scriptures teach that true Christians will not continue in sin ("whoever is born of God will not continue in sin"). That doesn't mean Christians never sin, as Paul makes clear, but it does mean Christians grow in Christ from babies to maturity and shed sinful habits along the way. The Christian life is characterized by growth out of sin, not continuance in sin. I would say it is likely that if Falwell knew he was sinning by eating until he was 400lbs and clogging his arteries... then I would even say the man was not a true Christian. Believe it or not it is possible for people to preach the gospel and not actually be saved themselves. But hopefully, if he was a glutton, he actually was in denial, and God will not hold him accountable for a sin that he didn't actually intentionally, knowingly commit. Only God knows for sure.
abcgrad94 said:
I was taught that in Biblical times, people would feast for days on end. Some folks would fill up, then purge, and go fill up again. That was gluttony.
So what if Jerry Falwell was big. Do people have to be perfect before we can learn from them? I'd rather have a fat pastor and know his weakness and pray for him, than have an outwardly perfect one who is full of pride inside or addicted to porn. They're both sin, you know.