A Response to Why I am #NeverTrump

[777]

Still rambling on about this? One thread gets locked, and one of them just go make the same thread to beat the dead horse. Look, I don't believe you when you say you know Trump is going to lose. You were wrong throughout the primaries, ever think you could be wrong again now? Also, if you KNOW Hillary is going to win, why go on and on about how terrible Donald Trump is? Sit back and wait for the election then sip champagne with CNN is what you should do if you really believe that.

 

[blessedwife318]

Still rambling on about this? One thread gets locked, and one of them just go make the same thread to beat the dead horse. Look, I don't believe you when you say you know Trump is going to lose. You were wrong throughout the primaries, ever think you could be wrong again now? Also, if you KNOW Hillary is going to win, why go on and on about how terrible Donald Trump is? Sit back and wait for the election then sip champagne with CNN is what you should do if you really believe that.

I could be, and if so I'll eat the humble pie on here. Not a big deal to me if I am, since my hands will be clean of either of them becoming president.

I did not start this thread, I just responded to someone else that did. The other was locked because it had reached its post limit.

 

[blessedwife318]

Just a note: I don't hear anyone else going to the extreme of saying, "There is no doubt in my mind about that."...

...but I'm starting to see your reasoning behind and when these irrefutable revelations came about. (" I resigned myself the minute Trump became the nominee...")

Maybe you could too if you "look" harder?


>>>


CRUZ LOST!

SORE LOSER!

THAT SETTLES IT!

No defense of Trump I see, only attacks on others. Very telling indeed

 

[InTheLight]

Yeah, RATs opposing Trump doesn't seem to have help stopped Hillary from winning the election.

RATs opposing Trump have not caused him to flail away, making gaffes, not spending money, concentrating on the wrong states, and generally blowing both feet off with a sawed-off shotgun.

 

[Rolfe]

Yeah, RATs opposing Trump doesn't seem to have help stopped Hillary from winning the election.

I thought that the polls were rigged. After all, Trump has more people at his rallies. *laugh*

 

[777]

The polls are probably rigged but Hillary hasn't won anything at all, yet, except if you consider the narrow Democrat primary win over an aged socialist from Vermont a "win".

I could be, and if so I'll eat the humble pie on here. Not a big deal to me if I am, since my hands will be clean of either of them becoming president.

I did not start this thread, I just responded to someone else that did. The other was locked because it had reached its post limit.

No, you didn't start the thread, that was the Rubio sour-graper this time but you act like it really is a big deal to you. Your hands won't be clean because one of these two will become president.

Sounds like your team got defeated in the playoffs, so you don't care who wins in the Super Bowl. Understandable, unlike the MSM's stupid idea that Hillary has already won the game just because their own scoring put her up by a FG in the early second quarter.

And you're wrong again about the application, or non-application, about Rule 40 last month at the RNC - Ted never won a majority of all bound delegates in eight or more states, he won only seven - his wins in Oklahoma and Alaska (among maybe others, forgot) didn't count under Rule 40, no majority of delegates.

 

[blessedwife318]

The polls are probably rigged but Hillary hasn't won anything at all, yet, except if you consider the narrow Democrat primary win over an aged socialist from Vermont a "win".



No, you didn't start the thread, that was the Rubio sour-graper this time but you act like it really is a big deal to you. Your hands won't be clean because one of these two will become president.

How do you know who Tendor was supporting in the primary? He is new to the site and so far the only thing I can gather from his post about politics is that he is also a #NeverTrumper.

Sounds like your team got defeated in the playoffs, so you don't care who wins in the Super Bowl. Understandable, unlike the MSM's stupid idea that Hillary has already won the game just because their own scoring put her up by a FG in the early second quarter.

And you're wrong again about the application, or non-application, about Rule 40 last month at the RNC - Ted never won a majority of all bound delegates in eight or more states, he won only seven - his wins in Oklahoma and Alaska (among maybe others, forgot) didn't count under Rule 40, no majority of delegates.

At this point, anything to do with Cruz is just a diversionary tactic to ignore Trumps latest follies. I will take your word on it about the 8 states, because its a moot point at this time.

Who wins the Whitehouse is no big deal to me, but what is a big deal is the churches testimony that is being destroyed by their constant cover of this man. In the 90s Evangelicals were ready to destroy Clinton over his sexual immorality, and now just 20 years later they are holding up a man who brags about his conquest, and that double standard is not lost on the world. Evangelicals have gone from "Character Matters" to calling anyone that still thinks "Character Matters" a Pharisee and that is the big deal to me.
In the quest for power, the American Church is trading in its moral high ground.

 

[Lewis]

Agreed which is why the threatening of delegates was totally uncalled for and yet it happened at the convention to anyone that did not kiss the ring.

Hmm, didn't see anyone kiss Trump's ring. Oh! You were using sarcasm! Bravo!

As the old saying goes, politics aint beanbag.

 

[blessedwife318]

Hmm, didn't see anyone kiss Trump's ring. Oh! You were using sarcasm! Bravo!

As the old saying goes, politics aint beanbag.

Bravo at recognizing sarcasm and then using some yourself.

Although I was being serious about delegates being threatened which was absolutely uncalled for.

 

[Tendor]

Wow! You must be like a Prophetess or something to be so sure of the future!

...Cool!!

Only guessing now? Hmm, crystal ball broke, or just poor reception?

In scripture, there is no record of prophets and prophetess having poor reception. The messages given to them were given by God and He is powerful enough to ensure His message gets through.Also, To my knowledge, prophets and prophetess did not use crystal balls. Based on literature that is what witches use. So what are you calling her, a prophetess or a witch? Either way, you really need to get your fact straight

 

[Tendor]

No, you didn't start the thread, that was the Rubio sour-graper this time but you act like it really is a big deal to you. Your hands won't be clean because one of these two will become president.

Congratulations! You found me out! Somehow you looking to the depths of my soul and saw that I am unapologetically a Rubio supporter. Good for you! There is one thing you overlooked however, you are completely wrong .I have never supported Rubio and I doubt I ever will. Since you seem interested in my political leanings. I will give you this hint. I have never voted for the Republican nominee or the Democratic nominee. Have fun figuring out my political leanings if you are so inclined to do so.

 

[Tendor]

Still rambling on about this?

Why do you keep contributing to the rambling then? No one is forcing you to make comments here.

 

[777]

Soooooo sanctimonius, you're just too good for Trump, Mama.

Tendor,I confused you with that Stephan person, my apologies. No, I don't know your "leanings" but what I do know is that you say something about Donald Trump and yourself in most of your posts. And I never said you were forcing me to comment, all I said was you were rambling.

 

[Tendor]

Soooooo sanctimonius, you're just too good for Trump, Mama.

I am assuming that this comment was not addressed to me since you said my name later. So I would have to assume that it is meant for your mother. If that is the case that is not an appropriate way to talk to her.

Tendor,I confused you with that Stephan person, my apologies. No, I don't know your "leanings" but what I do know is that you say something about Donald Trump and yourself in most of your posts. And I never said you were forcing me to comment, all I said was you were rambling.

No worries, I wasn't offended. In regards to rambling, I do wonder why you continue to post. The more people who respond to a thread the longer it lasts. If no one had posted anything this thread would have died.

 

[Rippon]

Who wins the Whitehouse is no big deal to me,

And that is the essence of your stance. But it's nothing to be proud of.

 

[Rippon]

A number of the NeverTrumpers have admitted they will vote for Hillary. They are showing their true colors.

Two reluctant men may vote for Trump after all is said and done: Brad Thor and Mark Levine. The latter really, really liked Trump's speeh about ISIS, or as I prefer to call the group --Daesh.

 

[Benjamin]

In scripture, there is no record of prophets and prophetess having poor reception.

Not a true one, duh.

The messages given to them were given by God and He is powerful enough to ensure His message gets through.

Okay...Duh again.

Also, To my knowledge, prophets and prophetess did not use crystal balls.

Does your "knowledge" allow you to observe and comprehend the meaning of words such as "like" and "or something"? How about having the sense to avoid making silly claims that I obviously wasn't suggesting?

.Based on literature that is what witches use.

I think generally crystal balls are thought of as being used by gypsy fortune-tellers. ...Just sayin...

So what are you calling her, a prophetess or a witch?

Ever heard of a False Dilemma Fallacy?

Uh, ...oh, you thought I was serious and being specific about the prophetess thing?

...And BTW, really bad attempt of trying to spin my sarcasm into me calling BW318 a witch! You should be ashamed of yourself for that tactic of accusation and I would never call her a witch.

Also, you left out the option of tin foil hat telepathy, but just in case you're wondering I wouldn't be serious about that either...

Maybe I should spell it out for you

, I was ribbing her about her expressions of extreme future telling...not calling her names as you've tried to suggest. BTW, ever heard of a Reverse Ad Hominem Fallacy? You might want to look that up because its attempted to be used quite a bit around here and you should know it makes those using it seem kind of desperate and foolish from my perspective...

Either way, you really need to get your fact straight

Wow! Boy! You sure told me!!

 

[blessedwife318]

Not a true one, duh.



Okay...Duh again.



Does your "knowledge" allow you to observe and comprehend the meaning of words such as "like" and "or something"? How about having the sense to avoid making silly claims that I obviously wasn't suggesting?



I think generally crystal balls are thought of as being used by gypsy fortune-tellers. ...Just sayin...



Ever heard of a False Dilemma Fallacy?

Uh, ...oh, you thought I was serious and being specific about the prophetess thing?

...And BTW, really bad attempt of trying to spin my sarcasm into me calling BW318 a witch! You should be ashamed of yourself for that tactic of accusation and I would never call her a witch.

Also, you left out the option of tin foil hat telepathy, but just in case you're wondering I wouldn't be serious about that either...

Maybe I should spell it out for you

, I was ribbing her about her expressions of extreme future telling...not calling her names as you've tried to suggest. BTW, ever heard of a Reverse Ad Hominem Fallacy? You might want to look that up because its attempted to be used quite a bit around here and you should know it makes those using it seem kind of desperate and foolish from my perspective...



Wow! Boy! You sure told me!!

I know you were trying to be funny. Which is why I was just amused at your over the top reaction. You and and I have had enough interactions to realize that, but not everyone can pick up on sarcasm in a written medium. Yes I know their were emoticons, but some may feel that even joking about fortune telling is a step to far considering how it is condemned in Scripture. Tendor is new so here so I think the benefit of the doubt should be applied.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

[Lewis]

No defense of Trump I see, only attacks on others. Very telling indeed

Frankly, when I scanned your original (yuge) post of #NeverTrump I stopped reading after the first few sentences. I quote;

"Old check White check Bigot check Misogynistic check Stupid check Corrupt Rich Business man check Evil Check"

I mean seriously, after that auspicious beginning what was the point of reading more? I could go to Huffington Post or Occupy Democrats and read exactly the same words. A waste of time.

 

[blessedwife318]

Frankly, when I scanned your original (yuge) post of #NeverTrump I stopped reading after the first few sentences. I quote;

"Old check White check Bigot check Misogynistic check Stupid check Corrupt Rich Business man check Evil Check"

I mean seriously, after that auspicious beginning what was the point of reading more? I could go to Huffington Post or Occupy Democrats and read exactly the same words. A waste of time.

I figured that few people actually read my OP or listen to the videos of Trump talking. My reasoning are out there for all to see but I cannot make people read or listen, that is up to them. It is telling though.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk