• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

A sincere question for Catholics

Carson Weber

<img src="http://www.boerne.com/temp/bb_pic2.jpg">
Hi enda,

3. You are a confessed follower of a church that may have this man as its 'infallible' leader.

The charism of infallibility in no way is determined by the quality of the man who holds Peter's office.

This charism is a negative gift of protection whereupon the Holy Spirit prevents the successor of St. Peter from defining error as a matter of dogma ex cathedra.
 

Kathryn

New Member
1. Cardinal Arinze made the statement.

2. Nothing on this thread changes that or explains what he actually meant by it.
The Cardinal explains here exactly what he means by the statement. And it is consistent with his other statements, and the statements of the present Pope, and the Church. :

But there are people who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church. They also are included in God's plan of salvation. There are, however, conditions. They must be sincere in their seeking of God. They must be open to the secret but real action of the Holy Spirit in them. They should follow their conscience in all matters of right and wrong. Because Christ has taken on human nature and somehow united himself with every man and woman, God can in ways known to him put people in link with the saving mysteries of Christ (cf. Gaudium et Spes, 22). He can give them the grace needed for salvation.

But to say that the followers of other religions can attain salvation under some conditions does not mean to ignore the fact that in these religions there ~re limits, errors and shadows. As St Paul says: "Very often, deceived by the Evil One, men have become vain in their reasonings, and have exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and served the creature rather than the Creator. Or else, living and dying in this world without God, they are exposed to ultimate despair" (Rom 1:21,25). This explains why the Catholic Church "painstakingly fosters her missionary work" (Lumen Gentium, 16) so that, becoming full members of the Church, people may have access to the fullness of the means of salvation, a fullness to be found only in the Church which is the ordinary means to salvation. The CCC therefore says: "To reunite all his children, scattered and led astray by sin, the Father willed to call the whole of humanity together into his Son's Church. The Church is the place where humanity must rediscover its unity and salvation. The Church is 'the world reconciled.' She is that bark which 'in the full sail of the Lord's cross, by the breath of the Holy Spirit, navigates safely in this world.' According to another image dear to the Church Fathers, she is prefigured by Noah's ark, which alone saves from the flood" (CCC 845; cf. also CDF, Dominus Jesus, 20-22). Cardinal Arinze Oct 26, 2000
God Bless
 

DanielFive

New Member
Kathryn,

With respect, when are you going to realise that this quote does not explain the original remark, the quote above only adds to the questions we might ask.

If you want us to take you seriously you'll have to stop hiding behind this quote, come out and face up to the problem here.

God Bless

Enda
 

Carson Weber

<img src="http://www.boerne.com/temp/bb_pic2.jpg">
If you want us to take you seriously you'll have to stop hiding behind this quote, come out and face up to the problem here.

Enda, relax. We must take Arinze's statements within the context of his faith, that is, the Catholic faith. Within the larger context of what we believe as Catholics, what Arinze has said is not problematic, properly understood. It is when you take Arinze out of the context of his Catholicism that you find what he has said as problematic.

I can say, "Non-Catholics may be saved," and someone on this board may run off claiming that I said Buddhists will be saved apart from Christ. That accusation is certainly problematic, separated from the faith that I profess, which makes my statement explicable.
 

Kathryn

New Member
With respect, when are you going to realise that this quote does not explain the original remark, the quote above only adds to the questions we might ask.

If you want us to take you seriously you'll have to stop hiding behind this quote, come out and face up to the problem here.
Cardinal Arinze explains exactly what he means by the original quote. He explains it in his own words. You may not like what he is saying but it is what the he believes, the present Pope believes, and the Church believes.

God Bless
 

Ray Berrian

New Member
Carson Weber said, 'The charism of infallibility in no way is determined by the quality of the man who holds Peter's office.'

Infallibility of the Papal chair is a misnomer and only in the minds of fallible constituents. Some of the past Popes have proven themselves unreliable because they introduced doctrines that are not founded on the Word of God the Bible.

Carson said, 'This charism is a negative gift of protection whereupon the Holy Spirit
prevents the successor of St. Peter from defining error as a matter of dogma ex cathedra.

If Cardinal Arinze is saying that people who honor other world religions will end up in Heaven, in his present church office, his error might well continue if he is elected the next Pope. Error never become the truth just because one has more authority as spiritual father in the Roman Catholic world of religion.

Many different kinds of religions will be a part of the one world church that will miss the rapture of the Christian church into Heaven. Apostate Christianity will miss Christ's coming for a quasi-church but will continue with their religion, [Revelation 17] into and throughout the Great Tribulation of seven years.

In our churches there are certain major beliefs or doctrines that we have to believe in order to remain orthodox in belief. We have several 'checks and balances' that insure correct doctrine in the church. I will only list one. When all of evangelical bishop/preacher types agree on said doctrine we can believe them to be true because they have come out of and have been studied in the precious Word of God. We have no great doctrines of the church that have been thought up in some bishop's study that we immediately rejoice over and then try to protect the brainstorm with the seal of the Holy Spirit.
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Posting this again - since no RC response addressed the details.

Originally posted by BobRyan:
Grant - Said -

Jesus is indeed the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except by Him. And anyone who sincerely desired to know God, but was unable to know about the truth of Jesus Christ, and would end up in Heaven, would be there BY WAY OF JESUS CHRIST and HIS SACRIFICE ON THE CROSS. They don't get to Heaven through anyone but Jesus, even if they never knew Jesus.


Bob Said
OK - then lets take three non-Christians.

1-Goes to heaven.
1-goes to purgatory
1-goes to hell.

In the Catholic teaching on this -&gt;(God so loved the World that He Gave...) - what is the difference between the three of them?
The "significance" is that IF we go with the RC view stated above and in the opening post of this
thread then there has to be a "BASIS" upon which a non-Christian is "saved and goes directly to heaven" vs one that is "saved and goes to Purgatory FIRST" vs one that is "not saved and goes to Hell".

I am asking "again" - what is the principle - the BASIS for each of those cases - from the RC POV.

In Christ,

Bob
 

Kathryn

New Member
The first two would be saved by Grace through the merits of Jesus Christ on the cross. The third in hell was damned forever without the grace of God. Jesus Christ is the judge not us. We are saved by Grace.
 

3AngelsMom

<img src =/3mom.jpg>
Kathryn,

The question must be asked then, WHAT would qualify 2 non Christians for heaven, or purgatory and then heaven?

The Bible is really quite clear on this one.

There are no loopholes.

1Co 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
1Co 6:10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

Gal 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
Gal 5:20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
Gal 5:21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.

Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.

Mat 5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Mat 18:3 And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

Did you see that? Unless you are CONVERTED. HOW could 2 NON Christians claim conversion?

I just don't get it.

It doesn't add up.

God Bless,
Kelly
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Originally posted by 3AngelsMom:
Kathryn,

The question must be asked then, WHAT would qualify 2 non Christians for heaven, or purgatory and then heaven?

The Bible is really quite clear on this one.

There are no loopholes.

1Co 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God?
Who then is righteous?
How does one become righteous?
 

Carson Weber

<img src="http://www.boerne.com/temp/bb_pic2.jpg">
The question must be asked then, WHAT would qualify 2 non Christians for heaven, or purgatory and then heaven?

Faith and the implicit desire for baptism.
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
Kathryn --
The first two would be saved by Grace through the merits of Jesus Christ on the cross. The third in hell was damned forever without the grace of God. Jesus Christ is the judge not us.
The question is what does the RCC say about this?

For example if we contrast among Christians between those that go straight to heaven and those stuck in the torments of Purgatory - the RCC gives some view as to what they think the difference is in what they did.

So - asking the SAME about Hindus - what difference is the RCC making between a Hindu that goes straight to heaven, one that it stuck in Purgatory and one that goes to hell. Is it their works? their faith? what? The kinds of sins they commit?

In Christ,

Bob
 

Kathryn

New Member
The Church acknowledges it is up to the judgement of Jesus Christ. If anyone is saved who does not know Jesus Christ, it is by Grace through the merits of Jesus Christ on the cross. He is the judge.

This however does not stop the Church from its Great Commission to baptise and teach all Jesus Christ has commanded. It carries out this commission through its missionary work to bring all of God's children to the fullness of the Catholic faith in Jesus Christ as Lord and Redeemer and Savior, who is the Way, the Truth, and the Life.


God Bless
 

3AngelsMom

<img src =/3mom.jpg>
Originally posted by DHK:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 3AngelsMom:
Kathryn,

The question must be asked then, WHAT would qualify 2 non Christians for heaven, or purgatory and then heaven?

The Bible is really quite clear on this one.

There are no loopholes.

1Co 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God?
Who then is righteous?
How does one become righteous?
</font>[/QUOTE]Our 'righteousness' is as filthy rags. The only righteousness we could have is to be in Christ, and claim HIS righteousness. A person who is NOT a Christian, ie they are not in Christ, will not have the ability to claim the righteousness of Christ for themselves, and therefore will still be all of those things those verses mention. AND NOT elegible for the Kingdom of God.

Jesus is the ONLY Way. THE ONLY.

God Bless,
Kelly
 

3AngelsMom

<img src =/3mom.jpg>
Originally posted by Carson Weber:
The question must be asked then, WHAT would qualify 2 non Christians for heaven, or purgatory and then heaven?

Faith and the implicit desire for baptism.
If someone has Faith in Jesus Christ, and is seeking baptism, (which comes AFTER a commitment to Christ), then they are Christians!

The 2 NON Christians, meaning people of other faiths, Budhists, Muslims, etc. how could THEY qualify for heaven?

God Bless,
Kelly
 

John Gilmore

New Member
Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the Catholic faith. Which faith except every one do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly.

And the Catholic faith is this, that we worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity; Neither confounding the Persons, nor dividing the Substance. For there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Ghost. But the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost is all one: the glory equal, the majesty coeternal. . .

This is the catholic faith; which except a man believe faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved.


The Athanasian Creed defends the Church Catholic from the heresies the Roman Cardinal is promoting.

[ June 22, 2003, 10:02 PM: Message edited by: John Gilmore ]
 

Ray Berrian

New Member
John Gilmore,

I'm not a Roman Catholic but agree with the Athanasian Creed as you wrote down for us. How are my chances at being a spiritual 'stow away? I have a few Protestants that I want to bring with me, if St. Peter will open the back door.
 

DanielFive

New Member
I met in Pakistan a Muslim. He had a wonderful
concept of the Koran. We were like two twins that had known one
another from birth. And I was in admiration of this man's wisdom. I
think that man will go to heaven.
Originally posted by Carson Weber:
The question must be asked then, WHAT would qualify 2 non Christians for heaven, or purgatory and then heaven?

Faith and the implicit desire for baptism.
Obviously therefore, Cardinal Arinze was aware that this man had an implicit desire to be baptized, and therefore, being a faithful servant of Christ, Cardinal Arinze baptized him immediately.

Is that what you are saying Carson?
 

John Gilmore

New Member
Originally posted by Ray Berrian:
John Gilmore,

I'm not a Roman Catholic but agree with the Athanasian Creed as you wrote down for us. How are my chances at being a spiritual 'stow away? I have a few Protestants that I want to bring with me, if St. Peter will open the back door.
Ray,
The Athanasian Creed is the heritage of all Christians (i.e., catholic). It was written to condemn those who deny the deity of Christ. Today, there are many who call themselves Christians but will not condemn those who deny the Trinity. They are encouraging unbelievers to remain in darkness by giving them false hope.
 
Top