• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

A six part discussion of sanctification

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Ok, but there's STILL something that I don't feel right about LS doctrine. I perceive you guys say that there is no such thing as a 'carnal' child of God, right?

If so, let's set the parameters for 'carnal'. Would you agree that Solomon was 'carnal'.

Some of them even deny that we still have the sin nature!

Is that so Icon? Is this what you hold to?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
From the first link;

The other main heresy regarding sanctification completely divorces sanctification from justification in such a manner that the necessity of sanctification in the Christian life is completely denied. Sanctification is said to be optional for believers. This is the heresy of antinomianism. The ancient form of antinomianism was Nicolaitan Gnosticism. The modern form that plagues ‘evangelicalism’ is dispensationalism.

Classical dispensationalism teaches that repentance belongs to the ‘dispensation of law’ and not ‘the dispensation of grace.’

:thumbs:

Old style dispensationalists will argue that if repentance and sanctification are required of Christians, then salvation is not by faith in Christ alone but also in works.
This error is found here on Bb and in many fundy churches. This is why the lordship teaching is mostly questioned

In such a scheme, professing Christians who refuse to submit to Christ as Lord and who refuse to lead lives characterized by obedience and holiness are called ‘carnal Christians.’

This heretical teaching has been called ‘easy believism’ and ‘the carnal Christian heresy.’

Sadly, such teaching has led countless thousands of poor souls down the broad path that leads to destruction. Many churches are filled with antinomian, unregenerate professors of Christianity who merely think of Christ as a fire escape from hell–who want the blessings of heaven but who are unwilling to depart from the sinful pleasures of this world.

With the current popularity of such teaching a consideration of the necessity of sanctification is in order. First, however, it should be noted that although the Bible teaches the necessity of personal holiness or sanctification in a believer’s life, it never gives personal holiness a meritorious role in salvation.

Sanctification is not necessary in order to be saved but everyone who is saved will be sanctified. In other words, faith without works is dead. It is counterfeit.


Christ saves His people from the guilt of sin and from its power.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
From the first link pt2


When Christians understand God’s holiness they will understand His hatred of evil. Jehovah of necessity hates sin with a perfect hatred; His whole Being reacts against it. ‘Your are of purer eyes than to behold evil and cannot look on wickedness’ (Hab. 1:13). ‘For You are not a God who takes pleasure in wickedness, nor shall evil dwell with You. The boastful shall not stand in Your sight; You hate all workers of iniquity’ (Ps. 5:4-5). Professing Christians would not be so easily fooled by anti-nomian heresies if they were taught the truth regarding God’s holy hatred of sin and all the workers of iniquity. God hates all doers of evil (Ps. 5:5) and is angry with the wicked every day (Ps. 7:11).

This seems to be lost in the modern day entertainment and man made rules replacing God's word in many locations. We have had threads on Bb where people suggest that more than 10-15 minutes of God's word preached or taught is too much to endure.

The idea that God sent Christ into the world to remove the guilt of people’s sins so they could continue to live wicked lives; so they could ‘sin as they please and still have remission’ is an insult to God’s holiness.

This is the root evil that the carnal Christian heresy produces....


When Paul asks the rhetorical question: ‘Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound’ (Rom. 6:1)? he answers with an emphatic ‘certainly not’!

Some post as if this question should be in the debate section.


‘Therefore, since we are receiving a kingdom which cannot be shaken, let us have grace, by which we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear. For our God is a consuming fire’ (Heb. 12:28-29).

The Kingdom has already started....
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
pt3;

2. The second reason that believers are required to be holy is that Jesus Christ is both savior and Lord. The carnal Christian heresy is dependent upon the idea that people can accept Christ as their Savior while at the same time rejecting Him as Lord. People are told that they can receive only part of Christ (as if He were a pie) and that they can continue living in sin.

As horrible as this sounds...it is a main teaching today. We have seen this here.

Then when they decide to get really spiritual they can ‘let Him be Lord.’ Can Christ be received piecemeal? Does the Bible teach that people can pick and choose to trust in only part of Jesus and still be saved? Such teaching is unbiblical and ludicrous.

This happens in many ways so as not to offend the goats. So now...instead of just walking the aisle for "salvation"???? people now are asked to walk the aisle....for....re-dedication.....that is , the first dedication did not quite take, so they try again to do something in the flesh...hoping somehow it might work this time....

would anyone want to.....make Jesus Lord today...as 20 choruses of I surrender all are playing to manipulate people emotionally to feel as if they are doing something...then claim...the Spirit was really moving today.

One must believe in Christ as He is revealed in the Scriptures. One must believe in Jesus’ atoning work (His humiliation, suffering and sacrificial death) as well as His resurrection. Christ, the victorious Savior, has ascended and sits at the right hand of God the Father. Our Lord’s humiliation is the foundation of His exaltation. Then, during the exaltation, Jesus, by the Holy Spirit, applies the cross to people of every nation. His humiliation and exaltation are organically connected and cannot be separated.

Yes....




Thus Paul wrote: ‘For none of us lives to himself, and no one dies to himself. For if we live, we live to the Lord; and if we die, we die to the Lord. Therefore, whether we live or die, we are the Lord’s. For to this end Christ died and rose and lived again, that He might be Lord of both the dead and the living’ (Rom 14:7-9)


A Christ who is not King and Lord over all is a false Christ, a figment of one’s imagination.


The carnal Christian heresy is an implicit denial of the necessity and power of Christ’s resurrection.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
pt4;
Given the importance that Scripture gives to Christ’s resurrection and lordship one should not be surprised that Jesus’ lordship was an essential ingredient in apostolic preaching. The message of the apostles was ‘Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved’ (Ac. 16:31). Paul said, ‘For we do not preach ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord’ (2 Cor. 4:5).

This is beyond question...no doubt!


In the book of Acts the word ‘savior’ appears only twice (5:31; 13:23), while the title ‘Lord’ occurs 92 times. The most commonly quoted Old Testament passages in the New Testament are Psalm 110:1 and Psalm 2:7, both of which speak of Christ’s exaltation and lordship. Paul says that Christians are to confess with the mouth ‘the Lord Jesus’ (Rom. 10:9).

very clear
Can a person honestly say ‘Jesus is my Lord’ when he refuses to submit to His lordship; when he is living in open rebellion against the king’s precepts? Reisinger writes: ‘How in God’s name did we come to huckstering off Jesus as some kind of hell-insurance policy, when the Bible announced Him as Lord and exalted Him to a throne? The New Testament preachers preached His lordship, and sinners received Him as Lord. There is not one example of Christ being offered any other way….


no....no other way....



God-centered evangelism proclaims the biblical message of the lordship of Christ at the outset, not as a second work of grace, or an act of optional consecration later.’ (2)



Real Christians receive Christ as prophet, priest and king; and, as king, Jesus rules over us and subdues sin in our lives.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
...Sadly, such teaching has led countless thousands of poor souls down the broad path that leads to destruction. Many churches are filled with antinomian, unregenerate professors of Christianity who merely think of Christ as a fire escape from hell–who want the blessings of heaven but who are unwilling to depart from the sinful pleasures of this world.....


I'm getting this feeling that you speak out of both sides of your mouth Icon. On the one hand you espouse SOVEREIGN GRACE, you know, PREDESTINATION, ELECTION, CALLING, GLORIFICATION, and all that good stuff, and then on the other you push stuff like the above. I'm really confused about you.

'You people' (LSers) like to worry others about their 'holiness' and quote OT 'BE YE HOLY', given to Israel in the wilderness, but, WERE THEY HOLY? NO! They committed grievous sins of unbelief, disobedience, murmuring, idolatry, fornication, rebellion, etc., BUT, even with Balaam wanting so badly to curse Israel, God made Balaam to declare:

He hath not beheld iniquity in Jacob; Neither hath he seen perverseness in Israel: Jehovah his God is with him, And the shout of a king is among them. Nu 23:21
(Blessed is the man to whom, the Lord will not reckon sin. Ro 4:8)

What very important GRAND Christian doctrine do you think that is a type of Icon?

In the exposition of the law given by the Author of the law in the Sermon on the Mount He gives the same ominous charge:

Ye therefore shall be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect. Mt 5:48

What do you think Icon? Can you 'sanctify yourself' to the point of being as perfect as God? Maybe you think you can, but I know better and thank my blessed Saviour for His amazing sovereign grace:

For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified. Heb 10:14

Yea, I'm really getting mixed impressions from you LSers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
k y r e d

the command in Leviticus to be holy for I am holy you're correct Israel failed to do it the church the true Israel is not going to fail the church the true Israel is going to be holy.

earlier you quoted Romans 13:8 10 for that to be fulfilled church members have to be holy persons they have to be holy they have to diligently seek after holiness in the life the fact that their elected and call on the holiness shouldn't need an explanation


I am using voice to text I'd like to expand on this and deal more with that later

fact that the command from the Leviticus to be holy is repeated in 1st Peter 1 and the church's told that there are holy nation and 1st Peter to solidify this fact
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
k y r e d

the command in Leviticus to be holy for I am holy you're correct Israel failed to do it the church the true Israel is not going to fail the church the true Israel is going to be holy.

earlier you quoted Romans 13:8 10 for that to be fulfilled church members have to be holy persons they have to be holy they have to diligently seek after holiness in the life the fact that their elected and call on the holiness shouldn't need an explanation


I am using voice to text I'd like to expand on this and deal more with that later

fact that the command from the Leviticus to be holy is repeated in 1st Peter 1 and the church's told that there are holy nation and 1st Peter to solidify this fact

So when a true Christian sins, or even chooses to go wayward for a time and season, they are no longer really saved?
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So when a true Christian sins, or even chooses to go wayward for a time and season, they are no longer really saved?

Read the texts that were bold in different colors one page earlier....listen to the sermons and read the link offered.....then ask your question


posts 42 to 46
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Read the texts that were bold in different colors one page earlier....listen to the sermons and read the link offered.....then ask your question


posts 42 to 46

The truth is that when any of us got saved here by grace of God though, all of us received jesus as BOTH our Lord and messiah, as it is the will of God that installed him as such, but also true that God allows us to go wayward at times, bu hat is always against His expressed will, and that he will always do what he needs to in order to bring us back inline!
 
Top