Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
Murder of a baby in the case of a rape is not acceptable. Yes, the woman went through a terrible event. However, that gives nobody the right to murder a baby. Period.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
First of all, this is not the law that we are currently under. That was for a specific time and a specific people and for different circumstances. You can't take Scripture out of context and expect it to apply.[Lev 20:10-12 NIV] 10 " 'If a man commits adultery with another man's wife--with the wife of his neighbor--both the adulterer and the adulteress are to be put to death. 11 " 'If a man has sexual relations with his father's wife, he has dishonored his father. Both the man and the woman are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. 12 " 'If a man has sexual relations with his daughter-in-law, both of them are to be put to death. What they have done is a perversion; their blood will be on their own heads.
I bet some babies might have died.
(I am not pro abortion, I am anti-over simplification).
[Lev 20:10-12 NIV]
10 " 'If a man commits adultery with another man's wife--with the wife of his neighbor--both the adulterer and the adulteress are to be put to death. 11 " 'If a man has sexual relations with his father's wife, he has dishonored his father. Both the man and the woman are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. 12 " 'If a man has sexual relations with his daughter-in-law, both of them are to be put to death. What they have done is a perversion; their blood will be on their own heads.
I bet some babies might have died.
(I am not pro abortion, I am anti-over simplification).
That's not an over-simplification, it is just that simple. Abortion is murder. Period.
Not sure what your point is.All Life Threatening Complications: 1 in 100 women
- Placental abruption (requires hysterectomy to save mother)
- HELLP syndrome
- amniotic fluid embolism
- severe pre-eclampsia
- eclampsia (epileptic type fits)
Because it was already forbidden in the OT. Thou Shall Not Kill.Abortion was practiced in NT times, and never once is it specifically forbidden when things like hair length and the correct way to slaughter meat were discussed so seriously.
Because it was already forbidden in the OT. Thou Shall Not Kill.
1% of all women will encounter some "life threatening complication" during a pregnancy. In about 1 in 1000 cases, the complication will be severe enough to place the life of the mother at risk even with hospitalization and treatment. In some percentage of these cases, the ONLY medical choice will be between terminating the pregnancy or watching BOTH the mother and unborn child die.Not sure what your point is.
However, that gives nobody the right to murder a baby. Period.
Abortion is murder. Period.
It is not a significant number and certainly not an excuse for murdering a baby.
Murder of the innocent is murder of the innocent. No qualifications need be added.Murder of a baby in the case of a rape is not acceptable. Yes, the woman went through a terrible event. However, that gives nobody the right to murder a baby. Period.
I think death penalty for adultery should still be enforced.[Lev 20:10-12 NIV]
10 " 'If a man commits adultery with another man's wife--with the wife of his neighbor--both the adulterer and the adulteress are to be put to death. 11 " 'If a man has sexual relations with his father's wife, he has dishonored his father. Both the man and the woman are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. 12 " 'If a man has sexual relations with his daughter-in-law, both of them are to be put to death. What they have done is a perversion; their blood will be on their own heads.
I bet some babies might have died.
(I am not pro abortion, I am anti-over simplification).
That post is stupid. No other way to put it.1% of all women will encounter some "life threatening complication" during a pregnancy. In about 1 in 1000 cases, the complication will be severe enough to place the life of the mother at risk even with hospitalization and treatment. In some percentage of these cases, the ONLY medical choice will be between terminating the pregnancy or watching BOTH the mother and unborn child die.
If ALL abortion is ILLEGAL, then YOU have chosen the tragedy of TWO deaths instead of ONE.
You claim:
Reality is more subtle.
The US sees 3.75 million births per year.
That means 37,500 "life threatening complications" per year.
That means 3,750 women hospitalized for "life threatening complications" with a significant chance of dying from those complications.
If 50% of those women require an abortion to save the life of the mother (I have no idea what the actual % is), then outlawing abortion will condemn an additional 1875 women to death during pregnancy.
From your CDC statistics, the number of pregnancy related deaths is already 634 WITH abortions as a treatment option, so banning all abortions may quadruple pregnancy related mortality ... and all THOSE babies will still die in their mother's wombs.
The Romans 13 argument is that capital punishments is right and just for people doing bad things.I think death penalty for adultery should still be enforced.
Since there is only one command and it is death for adultery, being pregnant was not an exception.That is out of context of the general beliefs of the time, and the Bible does not specifically refute this belief as would have been necessary for the people to understand that it was forbidden.
Was abortion acceptable for OT people? For NT people? At what point in history do you think abortion became wrong according to the Bible? What were the priests commanded to do with pregnant adulteresses?
Murder of a baby in the case of a rape is not acceptable. Yes, the woman went through a terrible event. However, that gives nobody the right to murder a baby. Period.
My wife and I support an organization called “Options for Women: Help for families”; A pro-life group that offers counseling, medical and financial assistance for mother and father and pre-natal for baby.Not that I disagree with you because I don't....but....
You see, sometimes the "terrible event" is more terrible than you and I can imagine.
- Sometimes those who are pregnant via rape are as young a nine years old. It's happened. Multiple times.
- Hypothetically, if your 13-year-old is pregnant via rape by her uncle, your brother, how do your talk her into carrying the baby? Do you force her? Against her will?
- Do you force any woman who is pregnant by being raped to carry the baby to term?
- Is anyone considering the mental health of the mother and the great need for counseling, meds, Christian support, and more.
Sometimes we are so caught up in protecting a fetus, and we should be - that the concern and protection and mental health of the one raped is never considered.
That's the only thing that bothers me when I hear conservative people discuss this topic.
In cases of rape and incest - which I do not believe is grounds for abortion - I never hear anyone speak of nor discuss HOW you will force a child to carry a child or HOW you will force a woman to carry a child.
There is a LOT more to the abortion abomination than meets the eye.