Folks, if sin entered the world through one man's sin, Eve's prior action was not said to be sin.
In that is the case, then you have a valid argument
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Folks, if sin entered the world through one man's sin, Eve's prior action was not said to be sin.
Folks, if sin entered the world through one man's sin, Eve's prior action was not said to be sin.
Gen.3:1-6.
But Gen. 3:1-6 is what it is.Folks, if sin entered the world through one man's sin, Eve's prior action was not said to be sin.
No logic to consider. Eve was as much in the world as Adam was. Eve knew the law same as Adam. (Whether he or God told it to her doesn't matter. ) She was created by God to be a help suitable for him. And Eve certainly knew good from evil after she ate.Some logic to consider;
12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin;
1) Sin was not in the world until Adam ate of the forbidden tree
2) Eve ate of the forbidden tree before sin was in the world
3) Eve is not a man but a woman.
4) Adam received the law concerning the tree before Eve was created
5) The headship of Adam over the woman was ordered after they ate the fruit and because of it.
6) Sin is the transgression of the law
7) Sin is not imputed to one's account when there is no law
8) Where there is no law there is no transgression
9) Eve did not have knowledge and understanding and was therefore innocent
10) Eve was deceived by the Serpent and his lie.
11) Adam was not deceived by the Serpent and his lie
12) Eve did not have consciousness of good and evil when she ate of the tree
13) When Eve ate of the tree Adam was there with her Gen 3:6
14) The key words in Gen 3:6 are "with her" the 46th & 47th words of v 6 in the KJ text
15) Adam blamed the woman for his sin of eating the fruit, not the Serpent
16) Eve blamed the Serpent for beguiling her and for being the cause of her eating Gen 3:13
17) Adam could have refused to eat the fruit and all would have been well.
18) The language suggests they both went together to the tree with the express purpose of eating the fruit.
19) The portal was opened by the deed of Adam for sin to enter into the world
20) Sin became a sovereign who reigned unto physical death.
21) Adam died immediately when he ate the fruit.
22) He died physically 930 years later when his spirit (his soul) departed his body.
23) Adam was cast out of the garden where God dwelled and therefore lost the presence of God
24) God in the person of his Spirit departed the body of Adam because sin now dwelled there.
25) The Spirit of God is the life of God.
26) Adam's image was different when he dwelled on the outside of the Garden of God.
27) He was a body and a soul and all his offspring inherited his image.
28) Jesus Christ was the second man who possessed the image of God, Soul, Body, And Spirit of God
29) He did no sin and offered himself as a substitute for their penalty of death for all sinners to redeem them to God
30) God accepted his payment and promised to give his life as the gift of God for those who repents and believes him
31) The life of God, his Spirit, is not "a" gift of God, but it is "the" gift of God.
32) Thus we are renewed to the image of Jesus Christ, who is the express image of God.
33) That image is trinitarian, Soul, body, And Spirit of God.
34) No one can stand in the presence of God without his image.
35) We will be presented in his presence when we receive the new body having already received the new birth..
36) Ye must be born again!
37) We are all born of Adam and are like him
38) We must be born of God and be like him.
39) We are born again when we receive the Spirt of God by believing what God says.
40) God says repent and believe the gospel and he will save whosoever will.
I understand that not all Bible readers will come to the same understanding because we are not reading the same words. How could we all come to the same understanding reading different words?
True, but Eve's action is not said to be "sin." And note in verse 7 that only after Adam volitionally sinned, were their eyes "opened"But Gen. 3:1-6 is what it is.
No logic to consider. Eve was as much in the world as Adam was. Eve knew the law same as Adam. (Whether he or God told it to her doesn't matter. ) She was created by God to be a help suitable for him. And Eve certainly knew good from evil after she ate.
Try reading the pertinent Scriptures more-closely.
Do you agree with the statement below?My understanding is that all men come into the world in a state of innocence and become accountable only after they have ability to reason in their heart the difference between good and evil.
But it was Eve who first believed Satan over God.True, but Eve's action is not said to be "sin." And note in verse 7 that only after Adam volitionally sinned, were their eyes "opened"
By Eve's own words, she knew God's commands. I don't know if God Himself told her, or Adam did, but it's clear she knew them. While some people claim she added to God's words with "not even touch it", she evidently didn't, as God didn't hold her accountable for adding to His words.robycop3, my efforts of attempting to understand the mind of God is to carefully consider the words God says on a given subject in the KJV. One or two subtle differences in words can oftentimes make a great difference in how our thinking and meditation are directed. My understanding is that all men come into the world in a state of innocence and become accountable only after they have ability to reason in their heart the difference between good and evil.
Obviously Adam had more light than did Eve because he fellowshipped with God in the garden before the fall and God had instructed him that he would die in the day he ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. He knew these things because he had been told, but he had not experienced the consequences that were associated with the act committed in the body. Whether or not the same restriction concerning the tree was placed on Eve, I do not think I can be sure in this stage of my spiritual development and understanding. I know she used the pronoun "we" shall surely die when she spoke to the Serpent, but she also used other words that was not in the context of what they were to do, such as "neither shall you touch it." Perhaps the Serpent chose this avenue to usurp the authority over the earth that God had given Adam by co-ercing Eve to persuade Adam to eat the fruit of the tree.
The conscience of man was not awakened until this event. Dispensationalists calls this "the dispensation of conscience." We know from other scriptures how that sin enters into a man and it is through ones who have knowledge and reason and intellect and a will that can choose to operate outside the will of God. This essentially makes a person their own god. It required an experiential knowledge of sin before it is charged against him.
Here are some pertinent scriptures, but not an exhaustive list for sure.
1 Jn 2:15 Love not the world, neither the things [that are] in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him.
16 For all that [is] in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.
17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.
4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make [one] wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
The process of sin:
James 1:12 Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.
13 Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man:
14 But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed.
15 Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.
16 Do not err, my beloved brethren.
I admit that I am on a quest for understanding and have not arrived at this point. If I comment on this event a year from now, I might have more light and will adjust my thinking accordingly. Meanwhile I admit I can be in error on some of my bullet points.
Yes, she was deceived and did what she should have known, if not deceived, was going against the expressed will of God.But it was Eve who first believed Satan over God.
Do you agree with the statement below?
Men are born morally neutral with an equal capacity for either good or evil.
An infant is not born in sin nor does it possess any innate moral characteristics. Such are obtained only by the exercise of the will and the habits that develop from it. In other words, we are “socialized” to sin or “conditioned” to sin because of continual exposure to a family and society that are themselves sinful for the same reasons.
What is the difference between morally neutral and innocent? Morally neutral would not be perfect either, but it would mean innocent, would it not?No, Men are born "innocent" as were Adam and Eve innocent before they were guilty of a sin. Innocent does not mean perfect.
No denying that Eve knew God's command, "Don't eat that fruit.If you eat that fruit, you shall die", but when Satantold heer the exact opposite, "You shall NOT die", she chose to believe him over God. Thus, she sinned first, & her sin was just as volitional as Adam's.Yes, she was deceived and did what she should have known, if not deceived, was going against the expressed will of God.
Consider the Greek word translated as "sin." (harmartias) in Romans 6:23. Here not only volitional sin, going against the expressed will of God, is in view, but also "inadvertent sin" doing something unknowingly against the will of God. (See Romans 5:14.) Thus our word can be used narrowly to only refer to volitional sin, but at other times refers to every kind of sin. Thus when Paul says "sin entered humanity" (Romans 5:12) he may have been using "sin" in its narrow sense, rather than it its broad sense.
What I am saying with certainty is that Eve was not said to have sinned before "sin entered humanity" due to Adam's volitional sin.
What is the difference between morally neutral and innocent? Morally neutral would not be perfect either, but it would mean innocent, would it not?
Anyone who reads your statements can make the obvious connection.
That's a lot of words to avoid my question. I will try again, and hope you answer it.I suppose it would mean a lot to someone whose purpose was to understand it and to fit the information into a rigid systematic theological network. To others, who would like to have the words of the text to be the teacher, not only in the initial text, but by comparing other later texts that addresses the subject so as to get the mind of God on it, the difference between morally neutral and innocent would be very important.
I can't get over the fact that our Lord Jesus is contrasted in the new creation as the head of the family, the last Adam, to the head of the initial family, the first Adam. Eve is not in the conversation with headship. Jesus is nowhere compared or contrasted to Eve.
I cannot be persuaded that this following verse does not mean what it says. It is not required that I must understand it in order to believe it. The words are too clearly stated to mean anything but what it says. The context has nothing in it about Eve.
Ro 5:12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
Ro 5:12 Wherefore <1223> <5124>, as <5618> by <1223> one <1520> man <444> sin <266> entered <1525> (5627) into <1519> the world <2889 - Kosmos>, and <2532> death <2288> by <1223> sin <266>; and <2532> so <3779> death <2288> passed <1330> (5627) upon <1519> all <3956> men <444>, for <1909> that <3739> all <3956> have sinned <264> (5627):
Having said that, I know I have much more to learn on this subject. My mind is open and searching.