OldRegular
Well-Known Member
I have said before that I still consider myself a Dispensationalist but I must say that the last couple of days have done a lot to make me reconsider that position. It always makes me wonder when people in a specific camp want to cover up or deny part of its history why they would want to do that. Why are the most ardent Dispensationalist on this board playing dumb about Darby. No one at my Bible College had any problem talking about him and the important role he had in Dispensationalism. No one had any problems with the charts that put the Church in a Parenthesis. So why the uproar on this board about it.
I have also found it ironic that so far I have been the only one that has told Old Regular that I have seen the Parenthesis church being taught and I'm also the only one that has not gotten up in arms about him viewing it as a horrific doctrine. For people that have stated many times that they don't believe in that doctrine, it seems strange that they would get so up in arms about it being described as a false doctrine. That would be like me saying I don't believe in Purgatory but then getting upset anyone talked about how repugnant the idea of Purgatory is.
So I guess my fellow Dispensationalist may have succeeded in pushing me out of the dispensational camp. A little more study and I just may leave the Pre-mill camp as well.
Lovely Lady, perhaps I should not say this, but it is a real pleasure to see you tweak their nose. I am sure there are many on this Forum who feel the same way, even some dispensationalists. I find it hard to believe that some of these people who were "eddicated" in Dispensationalists Bible Colleges never heard of Darby.
I have two Grand nephews in a Bible College near Charlotte, NC . Talking to my brother this week he indicated he was afraid they would succumb to the dispensational doctrine they teach. I ask him to find out what they are taught about Darby!