No. I am appealing to Scripture and offering the commentary of men. We need to appeal to Scripture but also show that our interpretation is not new.So you are appealing to the commentaries of men rather than scripture.
I thought you said it was wrong to do that.
You posted against this very thing, but now that you want to do it...it is okay!
Is this what people refer to as a double standard?
I do not believe anyone here would consider that a double standard (except perhaps those who are ignorant of what I have actually posted in the past).
In the thread I have spoken of the same passages. I just want other people who read the thread to know that mainstream Calvinism does not hold the position that a few hyper-Calvinists may hold.
But thank you for bringing this up. You are right that we have different levels of Christians and different levels of general literacy on this board. The clarification will hopefully help those who were confused now understand a bit clearer.