Not in the early church, that I have seen anyway.
Maybe one can support it with Scripture but it gets weird (the punishment is everlasting but the ones being punished are not). Technically.....maybe....but that really does not make any sence.
The earliest clear proponent of Annihilationism was Arnobius of Sicca (d 330 AD, CE), who has been rather roundly dismissed by his contemporaries, and subsequent church history.
From Tertullian, and Augustine on, the church’s development has generally accepted the traditional belief in the created immortality of the soul either united with, or separated from God depending on its own free choice.
What seems to be the main point of annihilationism is that a God of love and mercy could not let even the most sinful people suffer punishment eternally. But they have no trouble with God letting repenting sinners enjoy heaven eternally. This is a contradiction they do not face.
And the annnihilationists ignore the truth that we are to fear or intensely reverence God, because He is not just love. He also has furious wrath against sin.
They say 70 years of sinning cannot merit an eternity of punishment.
But it is not a time scale issue. It is a compatibility issue. A person develops their soul to fit in with either hell or heaven. Each is an eternal destination. So it is not that 70 years of life merits either eternal punishment or eternal bliss. It is all about how you designed your soul — as either godly or diabolical.
Get born again of the Spirit of Christ and walk in the Light to be compatible with heaven. Reject salvation and indulge the flesh to be compatible with hell.
This is why I see damnation as endless self-torment, due to not accepting the mercy of God provided in Christ’s sacrifice on the cross.
I don’t see eternal damnation as some external punishment imposed by God. You bring it upon yourself. Your punishment is your conscience working full blast as a fire, accusing and shaming you. Weeping and gnashing of teeth.