Perfect example
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How do you know its a false doctrine? They might believe modern translations are fine, yet choose to use KJV for unity purposes.If I'm looking for a church to visit, & I see one with a sign that says "King James Bible Only" or similar, I pass it up, as I know it has at least one false doctrine.
Those types of churches wouldn't put "King James Only" on their sign. Those types of churches aren't outspoken about being KJV Preferred, they just silently use that in their services.How do you know its a false doctrine? They might believe modern translations are fine, yet choose to use KJV for unity purposes.
My friend is a pastor at a kjv only church. The only reason they are KJV only is so when the kids memorize verses its all the same. They decided to be a Something only and KJV won the vote.Those types of churches wouldn't put "King James Only" on their sign. Those types of churches aren't outspoken about being KJV Preferred, they just silently use that in their services.
There is a church in on Defense Highway in Annapolis MD that has a sign on the roadside that states, "We only use the Authorized 1611 Version Bible." Put another way it reads, "If you are not KJVO you are not welcome here." I used to drive past that church all the time. That sign never failed to grieve me.Those types of churches wouldn't put "King James Only" on their sign. Those types of churches aren't outspoken about being KJV Preferred, they just silently use that in their services.
Paul wouldn't have put it on his website.If Paul were alive and had written that today on his website, he would have been chewed-up by the all sanctimonious brethren.
The article has nothing to do with Calvinism.The irony is that that sign is far better theology than the Calvinistic article judging it. Classic. Just classic.
Or, you could have visited and asked them if that's what they meant.There is a church in on Defense Highway in Annapolis MD that has a sign on the roadside that states, "We only use the Authorized 1611 Version Bible." Put another way it reads, "If you are not KJVO you are not welcome here." I used to drive past that church all the time. That sign never failed to grieve me.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Sad thing is I bet the sign wasn't even true. I DOUBT they used the 1611.There is a church in on Defense Highway in Annapolis MD that has a sign on the roadside that states, "We only use the Authorized 1611 Version Bible." Put another way it reads, "If you are not KJVO you are not welcome here." I used to drive past that church all the time. That sign never failed to grieve me.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Yep. Gnat-straining.Sad thing is I bet the sign wasn't even true. I DOUBT they used the 1611.
Sorry do you have something constructive to add or are you just going to attack me personally?Yep. Gnat-straining.
So someone is going to be in Heaven because of George Antonios? How blasphemous and arrogant!The posted article attacked an evangelistic church sign, one which was in tune with the Bible, by gnat-straining.
I gave a full answer in post #28.
Then posts were attacking KJVO church signs, also by gnat-straining.
So I pointed that out.
You're not the victim here. Remember, I'm the one you've called things similar to mentally unstable and crazy (I don't recall the exact terms but they're in writing in public on the board).
So someone is going to be in Heaven because of George Antonios? How blasphemous and arrogant!
Somehow I do not think they knew middle English.Sad thing is I bet the sign wasn't even true. I DOUBT they used the 1611.
Somehow I do not think they knew middle English.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Somehow I do not think they knew middle English.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk