1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Answering the major objection against Calvinism

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Skandelon, Mar 3, 2007.

  1. J.D.

    J.D. Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,553
    Likes Received:
    11
    J.D.'s response is in bold.



    Do you think that God hardening the Jews and ingrafting the Gentiles has nothing to do with Calvinistic doctrine? Let me ask you this - does God want to save the Jews? If so, why has He hardened them? Judicially or not, WHY HAS HE HARDENED THEM IF HE WANTS THEM TO BE SAVED?

    As for your experience, you might have simply fell off the fence on to the side to which you were leaning all along.
     
  2. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    No -- this is an objection to "Unconditional Election." Even the "elect" CLAIM to be "totally depraved." If no man had the ability to respond to God's call, that would MEAN NO MAN!

    But apparently God has given some "elect" men and women an ability to respond.

    So let's focus the objection on the right issue.

    skypair
     
  3. pinoybaptist

    pinoybaptist Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    8,136
    Likes Received:
    3
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You got it wrong, skypair.
    Unconditional election means election is not based on one's race, theology, creed, skin color, language, education, class, caste, conduct, misconduct, and all those silly little things fallen man has to divide himself from other men.

    In Paul's words, "Jew or Gentile". Gentile a.k.a. Greek.

    Total Depravity is exactly what Skandelon defined.
     
    #43 pinoybaptist, Mar 4, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 4, 2007
  4. npetreley

    npetreley New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    2
    Preach it, J.D.! Expose the darkness with light. ;)
     
  5. J.D.

    J.D. Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,553
    Likes Received:
    11
    Don't encourage me too much. I may start SHOUTING!! They don't like that around here. I think Episcopalians run this board. :laugh:

    Moderators: See the laughing face? It's a joke!
     
  6. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    JD, let me go through each of your points one by one...



    No, no, God can harden anyone, Jew or Gentile, I was only pointing to the context of this particular passage in which the Jews (generally speaking) are being hardened while the Gentiles are being ingrafted into the vine. What I'm trying to get you to see is that hardening is NOT equal to the Calvinistic teaching of what God does to non-elect reprobates.

    In your Calvinistic system a reprobate would be born unable to see, hear, understand and repent. He would grow up remaining in this rebellious and unbelieving condition without ever a hope or any real ability to repent. He would be TOTALLY DEPRAVED from birth, right?

    Now, here is the question you have to ask yourself JD. Is this the individual Paul is talking about in Romans nine when he wrote: "and he will harden whom he will harden???" In other words, is a Totally Depraved reprobate in the Calvinistic system equal to the hardened individual in Romans 9?

    ???Totally Depraved reprobate of Calvinism = Hardened Individual of Romans 9???

    I will attempt to show you that they are NOT equal, thus showing that the typical Calvinistic interpretation of this passage is incorrect.

    We can see the effects of the hardening process in many passages but lets look at Acts 28 for now:

    [FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica]"You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving." 27 For this people's heart has become calloused; they hardly hear with their ears, and they have closed their eyes. Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts and turn, and I would heal them.' 28 "Therefore I want you to know that God's salvation has been sent to the Gentiles, and they will listen!"

    Notice that they are NOT born calloused/hardened, they grow hardened over time. It also tells what their condition would be had they not become hardened..."
    [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica]they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts and turn."

    You see, men are not born unable to see, hear, understand and repent, they BECOME like that over a long period time of rebellion.

    Now, lets go back to the Romans 9 text: You assume that those being hardened in this verse are reprobates that could never be saved, but keep reading and you will see that those hardened can indeed be saved...my commentary is in bold...

    [/FONT][FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica]Rom. 11:7 What then? What Israel sought so earnestly it did not obtain, but the elect did. The others were hardened,

    So, far we have two groups...the elect and the others who are being hardened, right? Keep reading as we see what Paul says about these others who were hardened...

    8
    as it is written: "God gave them a spirit of stupor, eyes so that they could not see and ears so that they could not hear, to this very day." 9 And David says: "May their table become a snare and a trap, a stumbling block and a retribution for them. 10 May their eyes be darkened so they cannot see, and their backs be bent forever." Sounds bleek for those being hardened, right? But keep reading...

    11
    Again I ask: Did they stumble so as to fall beyond recovery? Not at all! Rather, because of their transgression, salvation has come to the Gentiles to make Israel envious.

    As I said, Paul is comparing the Jews, who are being hardened while the Gentiles (generally speaking) are being invited to salvation...but does that mean those being hardened are without hope? Have they stumbled beyond recovery? Read on ...

    12 But if their transgression means riches for the world, and their loss means riches for the Gentiles, how much greater riches will their fullness bring! 13 I am talking to you Gentiles. Inasmuch as I am the apostle to the Gentiles, I make much of my ministry 14 in the hope that I may somehow arouse my own people to envy and save some of them.

    You can clearly see that Paul's hope is that some of his brethern who are amoungst those being hardened may be provoked to envy and saved. Those being hardened (i.e Israel) are not necessarily going to hell. They are being blinded temporarily to accomplish a greater purpose...

    I need to go now so I'll stop there for now and let you comment....
    [/FONT]

    [/I]
     
  7. J.D.

    J.D. Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,553
    Likes Received:
    11
    Skandelon, I commend you for your careful examination of scripture. However, bringing the Acts 28 account of the hardening in to justify your view of "judicial" hardening does not work. You miss the fact that the reason man hardens his heart in the first place is because God has chosen that man to be hardened. Your formula is:

    Man hardens, THEN God hardens.

    But not so. A man's seeming self-hardening in the visible world is but a mere reflection of the invisible work of God - the source, the power, behind the man's hardening. Whether God works this hardening passively or actively makes no difference, it is still the work of God.

    Your misunderstanding is in your lack of separating the mechanics of salvation and reprobation from the source or power. When Paul hopes to "save some" by some "means", in this case, "emulation", he speaks of the outworking of salvation, the visible work of God, the mechanics/machinations. Paul's hope that his brethren according to the flesh might be saved, and the means by which he hopes that God may use to that end, does not in any way overturn the power source of salvation which Paul had previously established as "the election of grace".

    That this election of grace involved the choice of God in saving men through faith and not law is evident. But that God is the source of that saving faith is also evident, for the Gentiles had obtained that which they did not seek.
    This should be a cause of great confidence in the Gentiles. But alas, what does Paul say to them?
    And why should they fear?
    If the Gentiles have faith of their own power, they have no cause to fear. They may boast against the branches. But God may, and will in a time appointed, cut them off and graff in the natural branches through the same means by which they themselves came to be grafted in - through faith. And this:
    "until" indicates a time in which this event (the fulness of the Gentiles) will come. Who is in control of this "time"? WHO is the power behind this visible event? Is there any thing that man can do to prevent this event from taking place? NO! God in mercy has blessed the Gentiles through the gift of faith. At no time in history is God a reactor to human events. He is the actor, the determinant, the agent who acts upon history and man. And there will be a time, yet future, that God will turn in mercy to Israel, and according to his election of grace, save many of them, perhaps even "all" of them, at that time. THEN, IN GOD'S TIME, Israel (not just a remnant, but the whole) will be stirred to emulation and will be saved. This is all the workings of God.

    But in no case can you apply this promise to Paul's Israel, for Israel of old was destroyed, and never turned to their Savior. Their blindess in part has lasted even to this day in the year 2007, and shows no letting up. They were cut off from God's mercy. Why? Because He will have mercy on whom He will have mercy. And we gentiles continue to enjoy His blessings which He has bestowed upon us without just cause in ourselves.

     
  8. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    skandelon,

    You can prove how hardening works by just looking at this thread. :laugh:

    The more J.D. protests, the harder he is against the truth. Indeed, Calvinism was meant to be a "stand alone" theology -- all the concepts that had to be made up were incorporated and, like "The Preacher's Wonderful One Hoss Shey," if one peice fails (heaven help us), the whole thing crumbles!

    Here's what I've tried so far with Calvinists to try to reach some middle ground of truth (but again, they are "bunkerbuster" hardened in their theology):

    1) Try to demomstrate the difference between soul (conscience) and spirit. If all men had consciences, all could "hear."

    2) Tried to offer sovereignty on this wise: man has sovereignty over his own choices but God has sovereingty over the results. Man cannot get away from dealing with God's totally sovereign results (many of them warned of by God) regardless of what decisions he makes.

    3) Tried to show them that, yes, faith is given by God alone but that it is given to hearers who BELIEVE. Believing is man's duty -- man's choice and responsibility whereby God account us, not Himself, responsible for our decisions.

    4) And then, what this thread is really about -- that God must give some totally depraved people the "condition" of their "election" before they are "called." Whatever that condition is, it allows the "elect" only to hear the "effectual call" that is spoken at the same time as the "common (or maybe "sufficient") call." Just like Christ's blood is "sufficient" for all but "efficient" only for the "elect," so likewise with the call, I guess.

    But know what? These Calvinists are "hardened" harder than granite! They oughta know about "hardening!" They'd be great for defending "Ft. Apache!" :laugh:

    skypair
     
    #48 skypair, Mar 5, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 5, 2007
  9. johnp.

    johnp. New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,231
    Likes Received:
    0
    You can prove how hardening works just by this: If God loves all men ever born why does He, in that love, create people He knows are going to Hell? :) That's how one can prove hardening. The refusal to accept what is obviously logical.

    What about an answer skypair?

    john.
     
  10. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can't even tell who/Who you are saying is hardened in that question. Is it me for not agreeing with you or is it you for being an uncompromising Calvinist? :laugh:

    I can answer you this -- He didn't know they are going to hell until after He foresaw what they would do during their lives. That's what the "foreknow" is all about in Rom 8:29 --- foreseeing occured before creation, the foundation of the earth.

    So you would have to be asking me why He goes ahead and creates them anyway, right? Well, because He's already decided to make them before He foreknew what they would do. And it's not -- like Calvinism would have it -- that God doesn't try to save everyone of them! He does (Rom 1)!

    skypair
     
  11. pinoybaptist

    pinoybaptist Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    8,136
    Likes Received:
    3
    Faith:
    Baptist
    And where is the Scripture that says God's Omniscience is quasi ?

    That God's knowledge begins with His creation's actions ?

    Scripture please. Not conjecture.

    So, there is a point where God failed to do something He tries to do ?

    Again, where is the Scripture that says God tries to do something, anything, but fails ?

    Romans 1 ?

    Well, here's Romans 1, with the verse numbers. Which verse number says God tried, but failed ?

     
  12. johnp.

    johnp. New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    3,231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello skypair.

    Whether you agree with me or not I don't know because you do not answer the question do you? :)

    He didn't know? Cool. That's the only alternative isn't it. As long as you keep Him tamed. I have a follow up. :)

    Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad--in order that God's purpose in election might stand: 12 not by works but by him who calls--she was told, "The older will serve the younger." 13 Just as it is written: "Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated." Rom 9:11-13.

    Your definition of foreknow is rejected.

    Bit careless of Him old chap. Look at the mess He's caused. Is criminal negligence involved or does He just get a golden handshake like some other usless managers get when their businesses go down the tubes?

    That is not God. You are in error.

    EPH 1:11 In him we were also chosen, having been predestined according to the plan of him who works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will, 12 in order that we, who were the first to hope in Christ, might be for the praise of his glory.

    Do you see that? in order that Paul and the rest were for the praise of His glory God predestined them and caused history to acheive that end. That is why He works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will, so that His plan comes about. God didn't know? What sort of thing is he? ISA 46:10 I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come. I say: My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please.

    I make known the end from where skypair? From the beginning. He does not need to find out what is going to happen as He works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will.

    Yea sure, good lad ain't he? Took you long enough to admit open theism did it not? Are you embarrased by it?

    You make me look orthodox. :)

    john.
     
  13. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    I hope you understand that even some Calvinistic scholars would disagree with what you have said here...you seem hold to a view of double predestination which is even highly debated among those in your camp...

    Nevertheless, I don't see how you can hold to this belief system when scripture CLEARLY tells us that God doesn't even tempt men to sin...you would have us believe God not only determines the temptation but the hardeness of the man's heart which can only respond by sinning. I don't see that biblically supported at all.

    Additionally, you must recognize that the bible CLEARLY shows us that the hardening process is over a period of time and not from birth. It says men "become" or "grow" hardened/calloused. It goes on to clearly show the implications of that hardening process as being that which causes a man to not see, hear and repent and then tells us that it would have been possible otherwise. How can that be anymore clear?

    Read Mark 4 and it is clear that had Jesus not chosen to speak in parables that the people might have repented...How is that possible if they were born unable to see, hear and repent??? How does a man born deaf grow more deaf? How does a blind man grow blinder?

    Not only does scripture back up this understanding, but so does experience. Have you worked with children and youth??? They are typically much less calloused to the things of God...why do you think Christ talks about becoming like a child to enter the kingdom and about having childlike faith? We are not born hardened (unable to see, hear and repent) we only become hardened over time after continual rebellion.

    Judicial hardening is when God seals one in that hardened condition so that they will not repent...Why would he do this? To accomplish a greater purpose through them. We see this done with Pharoah. God didn't have to do anything to make Pharaoh not want to let his slave labor go, however a few plagues could have convinced anyone. God didn't want him to be convinced until the passover was accomplished so God actively intervened to judicially blind Pharoah from the obvious truth of the plagues.

    This was a foreshadowing of exactly what God does with the Jews. God seals them in their rebellious unbelief so that even thought they clearly hear and see the teaching of the Christ they can't understand or recieve them. He hids it from them in parables and sends them a spirit of stupor....WHY? To accomplish His purposes of redemption for the world. As Paul explains, he bound them all over to disobedience so that he might have mercy on them all.


    I agree. The source of faith is the gospel. "Faith cometh by hearing..."

    The source of the gospel is God! He is credited with faith, I just don't see that this is ever taught as being irresistably applied.

    What about the great number of Jews in Acts 2 who Peter preached to saying "you crucified the Christ"??? One day they are yelling "Crucify Him!!!" and just a little while later they are repenting at the sound of Peter's voice. Could it be that they didn't come to faith while Christ was on earth because they weren't being drawn to Christ yet? Could it be that Christ was hiding the message from them in parables lest they repent (mark 4)? Could it be that Christ need to accomplish something through their unbelief before removing the hardening? Read Acts 28:28! See the difference between the hardened Jews and the Gentiles?
     
  14. dwmoeller1

    dwmoeller1 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    1,155
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sticking my oar in the water concerning hardening...

    Hardening *cannot* be about sin. God does not tempt with sin.

    So what is hardening? If an unregenerate person hates God and truth, what is more likely to cause even more hate and hardness to God and the truth? Being confronted with what they hate would be the most reasonable answer. So, hardening is not enticing with sin, but instead confronting unregenerate man with the truth.
     
  15. J.D.

    J.D. Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,553
    Likes Received:
    11


    I wasn't talking about predestination. I was talking about hardening. But I do believe in double predestination. And I am not in a camp and I don't plan to join one. The real debate is over whether God acts passively or actively on the reprobate in hardening/blinding etc. Notice I said that it doesn't matter whether it's active or passive, the results are the same. The bible clearly attributes hardening ultimately to God by either applying hardening directly to the sinner's heart or by allowing the sinner to continue unabated in his natural progressive hardening.

    BTW God will open any heart He chooses to open, no matter how hardened.



    I didn't say that. Satan tempts men to sin. God either allowed Satan into the Garden, or He sent him there. Either way, he was there because God wanted him there.



    It might be more clear if you could provide proof in scripture that hardening is a "process" as you put it, and not just repeatedly refer to Acts 28, which doesn't prove it anyway.

    I can prove that hardening is of God.

    Isaiah 63:17 (KJV) O LORD, why hast thou made us to err from thy ways, and hardened our heart from thy fear? Return for thy servants' sake, the tribes of thine inheritance.

    John 12:40 (KJV) He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.

    Romans 9:18 (KJV) Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.



    Man was blinded in Adam. "thou shalt surely die". And he did. And then he turned to fig leaf religion. Then God saved him with skins. This salvation was of God's own will and provision. Then God cast Adam out of the garden, and set Cherubim to guard and a sward to guard the tree of life.

    Unregenerate man would gladly partake of eternal life without repentance if he could. But he CAN'T. He is disabled by his own sinfulness AND God's decree. Man may desire, and even attempt to approach, the tree of life; he is nevertheless UNABLE to do it unless God grants it to him.



    Scripture and experience teaches me that people make false professions, and that includes children. Children are easy to manipulate. Whether a child is truly converted or not, only God really knows. Same with adults.

    A child can be very hardened toward the things of God. The hardness of their heart becomes evident as soon as they have opportunity to express it.

    Psalms 58:3 (KJV) "The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies."

    Babies are born in sin with sin in them. They are sinners. The fact that they have not had opportunity to act on their Adamic nature does not make them any less sinful. A baby needs grace.

    The evil of Hitler was there in his heart, even as he was a sweet innocent googly baby. Babies grow up to be sinners because sin is in them.

    I've worked with children long enough to see this truth to fruition.

    Jesus makes a commendation of child-like faith, a faith that is unreserved, complete in its trust. It is this TYPE of faith that we must experience in order to be saved. That's a God-given faith, which is complete and enduring.

    Jesus was not saying that all children are saved. He was using child-like faith as an example of conversion faith.


    It's true that God hardened Pharaoh for a certain purpose:

    Exodus 9:16 (KJV) "And in very deed for this cause have I raised thee up, for to shew in thee my power; and that my name may be declared throughout all the earth."

    There's nothing said about Pharaoh repenting and turning to God in the end. He was destroyed without hope. God did not have mercy on him. God killed him and thousands of his army in an instant and sent them to hell. The only mercy that he experienced was the years of earthly life that God allowed him to breath air.


     
  16. J.D.

    J.D. Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    3,553
    Likes Received:
    11

    The church in Jerusalem consisted of maybe, at the most, twenty thousand counting women and children. What ratio to the whole would that be?

    God saved a remnant of Jews according to the election of grace.

    National Israel rejected her messiah. This rejection is seated in the political powers - the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the Sanhedrin, the high priest, the temple, Herod, etc. And the general population also. Israel rejected her Savior because Israel's people, generally, but individually, rejected their Savior.

    What was the difference between the Jews of the crucifixion and the Jews of Pentecost? Glad you asked.

    "and they were pricked in their heart".

    What was it about their hearts? Were they just some good ole boys? No. You said yourself that it was the same crowd that cried, "crucify him!" So what was the difference? It was something that had HAPPENED in their hearts.

    Ezekiel 36:26 (KJV) A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh.

    Deuteronomy 30:6 (KJV) And the LORD thy God will circumcise thine heart, and the heart of thy seed, to love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, that thou mayest live.

    Hebrews 8:10 (KJV) For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:

    Acts 16:14 (KJV) And a certain woman named Lydia, a seller of purple, of the city of Thyatira, which worshipped God, heard us: whose heart the Lord opened, that she attended unto the things which were spoken of Paul.

    2 Corinthians 4:6 (KJV) For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

    Jeremiah 31:33 (KJV) But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
     
  17. Skandelon

    Skandelon <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    9,638
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't understand this statement... The temptation itself is not "sin" it is only the inticment to sin, right? And God doesn't intice/cause/coherse men to sin. Wouldn't actively preventing someone from obedience be inticment to sin? Not listening to God's command is sin, right? If God is the one said to actively be causing someone to not hear and obey that would surely seem to fly in the face of what scripture clearly says God does not do...

    Now, granted even from my view point God does actively harden men...however the way I explain this it is much less difficult to swallow, IMO. In my view judicial hardening is simply hiding or confusing the revelation of truth which could otherwise lead to repentance. So God is not said to have caused or inticed anyone...he simply lets them continue down their already self hardened path and makes sure no revelation convinces them to repent prior to His great purpose being served.

    Let's look at another analogy. Suppose my 3 year old daughter was told that she is not to sneak cookies from the cookie jar. In another room out of sight I see into the kitchen that my daughter is looking at the cookie jar. She looks around the room to see if anyone is watching. As a parent I can tell what she is thinking...she is about to steal a cookie and she knows she isn't supposed to. Now, as a parent I could step into the room so that she see me prior to her committing his sin. Upon seeing me she would forego here evil plot and give up the idea of getting the cookie...at least until the next time she was alone. However, I decide to not step into the room. I remain out of sight to allow her to be tempted and then pouce into action to catch her with the hand in the cookie jar.

    Now, by not stepping in at the moment I saw she was being tempted did I cause the temptation? No. I allowed it to continue, but I didn't cause it. I could have ended it my simply showing myself, but I didn't. This is like hardening. By simply hiding the truth (i.e. that I was present and watching) I allowed my daughter to sin. I'm I in any way culpable for that sin? No. I merely allowed it though I could have stopped it.

    Could God have stepped into the 1st century and clearly shown Himself in Christ to make all the Jews of that time believe Him? Of course. He could have done a Damascus road experience with all the Jews if He wanted to. He didn't. Instead we see Christ telling his disciples to keep things quite until the right time. We see him hiding the truth in parables. WHY? If men are born deaf, blind and dumb to the truth why would he need to do this??? He did it because he didn't want them to come to repentance YET! He had a bigger redemtive purpose to accomplish through them first. Don't allow the context of that judicial hardening of the Jews cloud your view of men's inherent nature. Men are very much capable of hearing, seeing and repenting when confronted by the powerful gospel truth if they have not been judicially blinded.
     
  18. joycebuckner

    joycebuckner New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2007
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    How can anyone say that God did not know what anyone was going to do when God is and always "all knowing". Why would God have Jesus go through what he did if God had everything planned out for us eternally ? He loves us and calls us unto salvation. We are not robots. We are given a choice. We except the salvation through grace that Eph. 2:8-9 tells us of or we don't. Maybe it is only I that understands the Holy Spirit came into people after salvation and still does today. No one has the Holy Spirit until after excepting The Lord Jesus Christ as their saviour.
    The Holy Spirit called me unto salvation.......man, if I have ever felt anything in my life, I felt Him calling me that day.Once I yeilded to him, my life has never been the same.
    Any way what a life changing experience it was. I know that I know what happened that day and my home is awaiting me some day.....
    God bless you all:praying:
     
  19. npetreley

    npetreley New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Messages:
    7,359
    Likes Received:
    2
    What enabled you to hear (feel) Him calling you that day? Why didn't you hear Him the day before? Was He not calling you on that day? Was your "line" busy? Were you unable to hear the day before?
     
  20. skypair

    skypair Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nowhere. That's a false construct. Try this --- He knows everything that can be known. It's like "The Preacher's Wonderful One Horse Shey." Preacher built it knowing that nothing lasts forever. He made it out of the best of everything wondering which carefully chosen part would fail first. But since he was so careful, he couldn't know until it broke.

    Same with God -- except He COULD foresee the thing all the way through to the end! He knew He was using "corruptible" materials. His hope was that all would hold up. But He allowed "corruption" for the sake of the creation itself -- Adam.

    "God created... and He saw that it was good." Does that suggest that God learned that creation was well designed? "And God looked down and saw that the thoughts of men's hearts were only evil continually..." Doesn't that indicate that God "looked" in order to learn?

    In mankind, for sure! This just establishes that there are "wills in conflict" -- that God has allowed man to have an opinion of his own upon which to live his life. Now, God gives man His "opinion," too. Man could, and often does, believe and trust God's "opinion." God becomes sovereign over that life, right?

    "How many times did I call you to Myself like a hens her chicks, but you would not?" Mt 23 There are many, pinoy. You're not ignorant of this.

    Rom 1:16-20 gospel is the power of God unto salvation -- God manifested -- men knew -- men did not glorify Him.

    skypair
     
Loading...