If someone from the UK thinks you're Leftist, you make Mao look like Rush Limbaugh.
It's a pity what the Labour Party is trying to do to the UK. The Labour Party refuses to discipline the anti-Semitic leadership of Jeremy Corbyn.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
If someone from the UK thinks you're Leftist, you make Mao look like Rush Limbaugh.
You mean Fox News don’t youHead in the sand still, huh? Come up for air and get a dose of reality.
You mean Fox News don’t you
I don't 'promote' Islam.or any other false religion whether it be Judaism, Hinduism or any other '-ism'
"Not demonizing and stigmatizing a group of people"<> "promoting a false religion"Your words and actions, and lack of them, actually do.
The Labour Party under Corbyn does indeed have a problem with anti-Semitism. This is however not the same as anti-Zionism. Beware of conflating the two.
"Not demonizing and stigmatizing a group of people"<> "promoting a false religion"
If you think Lauren Southern is a Christian then I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you, brother. She's about as 'Christian' as John Shelby Spong (from the other extreme of the spectrum)
So do you have no law against incitement or threats to kill?Matt, I'm not going to get into the specific persons being discussed here. I will, however, make these observations on this discussion
Much the kerfluffle is based on the First Amendment to the Constitution
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
I bolded the pertinent portions of the amendment. As you can see, it prohibits the sorts of laws and regulations HM's government has passed over past few years.
Not discounting the American contribution to victory, for which we are grateful but, with the exception of Pearl Harbor and some hikers in Oregon, you were not directly attacked. We on the other hand had shedloads of bombs dropped on us and lived in fear of invasion until at least after the invasion of the USSR and Pearl Harbor; my mother had glass from a broken window shattered by the blast from a V1 showered all over her in her cradle as late as 1944. So, with all due respect, there is a difference with how we regard the threat from Nazism.Also, bringing up the British contributions to the defeat of the Third Reich rings discordantly in my ears. My father, uncles, and step-grandfather served in the American Armed Forces in the same time period. My father and his brother in the USAAF, my aunt's husband in the Navy, grandpa served under Patton in the ETO. So, it's not like there are any warm and fuzzy feelings towards Nazis and Fascists. There is, however, a recognition that their ability to speak is protected whether we like it or not.
So do you have no law against incitement or threats to kill?