AOC Visits an X-Rated Burlesque Show

[church mouse guy]

That's what I was talking about in my post "But I certainly didn't tell him he was damned to Hell because of his sexual tendencies. That might have turned him off the gospel for the rest of his life."

I do agree we should speak out on moral issues. But that doesn't include supporting a particular party or candidate as a "Christian" party or candidate.

No one but you thinks that the Democrats are a Christian party. You cannot even say that it is wrong to spit on people or throw things at them, etc., can you? Yet no one attacks you physically because everyone knows that you are a tiny minority and people are looking for common sense, which you don't offer anyone. Do you think that it is right for Democrats to spit on people who do not vote the way that they do?

 

[church mouse guy]

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her Green New Deal proposal were welcomed at a celebration over the weekend.

A source tells PEOPLE the congresswoman was at McKittrick Hotel’s Club Car for the late night XX-rated burlesque show “Bartschland Follies” with her boyfriend Riley Roberts on Friday evening.

After her arrival, Ocasio-Cortez, 29, was greeted by crowds cheering “Green New Deal!” and “AOC!”

“You are all beautiful,” she told the audience and show’s cast when she was invited up on stage during the event, which was hosted by nightlife icon Susanne Bartsch.

Read more at:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Greeted at X-Rated Burlesque Show by Chants of 'Green New Deal!'

This Riley Roberts must be a beta guy if he is living with AOC and going to strip clubs at her order. She must boss him like a dog. I imagine that she has a dozen cats at least.

 

[FollowTheWay]

Did you ever feel or express such concerns when the whole world seemed to be embracing the soon-to-be-president Obama? Or when they mindlessly bestowed upon him the Nobel Peace Prize?

No. Obama was an excellent president and is still highly regarded both here and around t5he world.

 

[FollowTheWay]

Oh, I have the right to judge yourself?

??

 

[FollowTheWay]

No one but you thinks that the Democrats are a Christian party. You cannot even say that it is wrong to spit on people or throw things at them, etc., can you? Yet no one attacks you physically because everyone knows that you are a tiny minority and people are looking for common sense, which you don't offer anyone. Do you think that it is right for Democrats to spit on people who do not vote the way that they do?

I don't think either party is the Christian Party. There is no such thing just as there is no such thing as a Christian nation.

 

[FollowTheWay]

FollowTheWay, I do not agree. My disagreement is partially based on the following scripture. God loves His children and has given us instructions concerning how to protect ourselves, our spouses and our children against being contaminated with the thoughts and life styles of unregenerate sinners.

Please, prayerfully, consider the following:

2Ti 3:1 KJV - This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2Ti 3:2 KJV - For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
2Ti 3:3 KJV - Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
2Ti 3:4 KJV - Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
2Ti 3:5 KJV - Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

2Jo 1:9 KJV - Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.
2Jo 1:10 KJV - If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into [your] house, neither bid him God speed:

Jesus would disagree with you. He talked to prostitutes, tax collectors, Samaritans, women alone, etc.

 

[FollowTheWay]

Tell that to the florists, cake decorators, and photographers who have fallen afoul of the various and sundry discrimination suites brought by some in he LGBT community.

If Americans are forced to follow the precepts of one religion they should be forced to follow the beliefs of all religions under the non-establishment clause of the First Amendment.

 

[Revmitchell]

If Americans are forced to follow the precepts of one religion they should be forced to follow the beliefs of all religions under the non-establishment clause of the First Amendment.

It doesn't say that at all.

 

[just-want-peace]

If Americans are forced to follow the precepts of one religion they should be forced to follow the beliefs of all religions under the non-establishment clause of the First Amendment.

WOW!!!!!
What rock did you find this concept under?????

 

[church mouse guy]

I don't think either party is the Christian Party. There is no such thing just as there is no such thing as a Christian nation.

Everyone agrees that Hillary was the most immoral. Why was she going to Lolita Island with Epstein? Why did she violate federal law by having an email server? Why did she accept 145 million dollars from the Russians? Why did she sell 20% of American uranium mines to Russia? Why did she call people deplorables just because they would not vote for her? Why did she support abortion and same-sex marriage?

Do you think it is okay for Dems to spit on people who do not believe as they do?

 

[Alcott]

??

That was a joke. I never know whether you're really so dense or pretending.

So now, answer the more serious question:
Or do you mean we have no right to judge unless we refuse to admit we're judging ... considering your judging of Trump?

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

No. Obama was an excellent president and is still highly regarded both here and around t5he world.

You are wrong about Obama, but the point here is that Trump hasn't near the backing he had or has. Your concern is misplaced and seems seriously lacking in discernment.

 

[FollowTheWay]

Everyone agrees that Hillary was the most immoral. Why was she going to Lolita Island with Epstein? Why did she violate federal law by having an email server? Why did she accept 145 million dollars from the Russians? Why did she sell 20% of American uranium mines to Russia? Why did she call people deplorables just because they would not vote for her? Why did she support abortion and same-sex marriage?

Do you think it is okay for Dems to spit on people who do not believe as they do?

"Everybody?" Not even close. Trump is evil.

 

[FollowTheWay]

That was a joke. I never know whether you're really so dense or pretending.

So now, answer the more serious question:
Or do you mean we have no right to judge unless we refuse to admit we're judging ... considering your judging of Trump?

I am not correct in judging his salvation but it'd so obvious to me because of his actions.. I can judge his performance in office which is the worst of any president I'm familiar with. It's said that Andrew Johnson, James Buchanan, Warren G. Harding and Franklin Pierce were pretty bad as well.
Historical rankings of presidents of the United States - Wikipedia

 

[church mouse guy]

"Everybody?" Not even close. Trump is evil.

Don't be silly. Do you think that Dems should spit on people who don't believe what they do?

 

[Alcott]

I am not correct in judging his salvation but it'd so obvious to me because of his actions.. I can judge his performance in office which is the worst of any president I'm familiar with. It's said that Andrew Johnson, James Buchanan, Warren G. Harding and Franklin Pierce were pretty bad as well.
Historical rankings of presidents of the United States - Wikipedia

You made the statement, "I don't have the right to judge anyone except myself..." Yet the first opening of your trap in response to the subject of this thread was to squeal how "immoral" Trump is. The truth is that you believe everything negative about Trump because you detest him, and therefore you meld his personal morals with his performance in office, while declaring in regard to others that those are independent subjects.

If it makes you feel any better-- which I doubt-- I think Trump has been a bad guy most of his life in a lot of ways. But I wasn't there for any of his adulteries or gropings, so to me it is just hearsay. And most of the media, of course, relishes that hearsay; and never says a word around the middle of January about Martin Luther King's adulteries, which are also hearsay to me (and to you, too, supposedly). But if you put those 2 to the same standard, you would say that government and banking should not come to close on that particular day because of an immoral man.

 

[Wesley Briggman]

Jesus would disagree with you. He talked to prostitutes, tax collectors, Samaritans, women alone, etc.

Yes, Jesus did as you say. He also walked on water, controlled the weather and raised the dead.

Does your theology stop with the Gospels? The verses I invoked are instructions for the Church. I am disappointed that you seemingly reject them out of hand.

Please tell me I am mistaken.

 

[FollowTheWay]

FollowTheWay, I do not agree. My disagreement is partially based on the following scripture. God loves His children and has given us instructions concerning how to protect ourselves, our spouses and our children against being contaminated with the thoughts and life styles of unregenerate sinners.

Please, prayerfully, consider the following:

2Ti 3:1 KJV - This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2Ti 3:2 KJV - For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
2Ti 3:3 KJV - Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
2Ti 3:4 KJV - Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
2Ti 3:5 KJV - Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.

2Jo 1:9 KJV - Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.
2Jo 1:10 KJV - If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into [your] house, neither bid him God speed:

What's your point? Are you claiming there are people on this earth that Christians should NOT share then gospel with? Your Biblical passage does not support that at all.
Strong's G794
without natural affection, unsociable (Rom 1:31 marg.), inhuman (2Ti. 3:3 RSV), unloving (2Ti. 3:3 NKJV)

 

[FollowTheWay]

You made the statement, "I don't have the right to judge anyone except myself..." Yet the first opening of your trap in response to the subject of this thread was to squeal how "immoral" Trump is. The truth is that you believe everything negative about Trump because you detest him, and therefore you meld his personal morals with his performance in office, while declaring in regard to others that those are independent subjects.

If it makes you feel any better-- which I doubt-- I think Trump has been a bad guy most of his life in a lot of ways. But I wasn't there for any of his adulteries or gropings, so to me it is just hearsay. And most of the media, of course, relishes that hearsay; and never says a word around the middle of January about Martin Luther King's adulteries, which are also hearsay to me (and to you, too, supposedly). But if you put those 2 to the same standard, you would say that government and banking should not come to close on that particular day because of an immoral man.

Documented history supported by facts (remember those?) is not hearsay. Have you been "there" for any of Trump's actions?

 

[church mouse guy]

Documented history supported by facts (remember those?) is not hearsay. Have you been "there" for any of Trump's actions?

Hillary is openly criminal but you never say a word against her. She even went with Bill on Epstein's Lolita express. Schumer took money from Epstein. Do you think it is okay for Dems like you to spit on people?