Archangel Michael being the Angel of Jehovah.

[Ben1445]

Explain the explanation.
John 1:1-2.
The Word was always the Son of God with God.
The Word was always God too.

The Word only charged how He is with God.
The Word was always God.

What are you not understanding?

And Michael is mentioned where?

 

[Ben1445]

And Michael is mentioned where?

1+1=2
That is true.

But whatever comes next is not necessarily true because of 1+1=2.

The ability to know truth doesn’t mean that anything known of is truth.
Jumping from John 1 to Zechariah 3 is a really long jump.

 

[37818]

None of these names in Hebrew prove the person is God.

Michael “Who is like God?”

Malachi “God’s angel/messenger”

Jeremiah “Yahweh will exalt," "Yahweh has uplifted," or "Yahweh loosens".

Isaiah “Yahweh is salvation," "the Lord is salvation," or “God saves”.

Ezra “help of God”.

Hezekiah “strength of God”

Micah “Who is like God?"

Ezekiel “God strengthens”.

Nehemiah “God comforts”.

Only that Angel named Michael is the only Biblical Archangel.
And,
Revelation 12:7, . . . Michael and his angels . . . .

What is the argument that the Archangel Michael can not be the Angel of the LORD?

 

[Ben1445]

Only that Angel named Michael is the only Biblical Archangel.
And,
Revelation 12:7, . . . Michael and his angels . . . .

What is the argument that the Archangel Michael can not be the Angel of the LORD?

Hebrews 1:5
For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?


Hebrews 1:13
But to which of the angels said he at any time, Sit on my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool?

Were Jesus an angel, Michael would be that answer according to your reasoning.

It is no surprise that there is only one archangel. The description is that of one angel over the rest. Were there two or three archangels, we would need to redefine the word.