1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Are all Fundamental baptist churches KJO?

Discussion in 'Fundamental Baptist Forum' started by milby, Apr 24, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    28,745
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Pitchback

    You have got to be kidding. Don only asks questions of other, but when others ask him questions, he answers with another question. Just look at his posts in this thread.

    Turning now to your question, I gave 5 criteria and you only addressed one.

    Copy and paste my 5 criteria and then answer each with a yes or no. Then I will be able to answer "do we fit your criteria for a KJVO church." As I said, IFB church members deny being in a KJVO church to avoid the baggage of that label.

    And I have one more question, when was the last time you replaced your pew bibles? Did the leaders do an evaluation and determine the KJV was the best, over and against the NKJV? Just saying....
     
    #61 Van, May 7, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: May 7, 2012
  2. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,371
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Faith:
    Baptist
    As best as I can remember, we use the KJV as a pew Bible not because we think it is the "best". (In the rear of the auditorium, we have a table with free NTs. On the table, folks have the choice of a KJV or a NASB) Rather, we use it for consistancy. We get visitors from all over the country and the world. So, we use the KJV as the Bible of record. If I am reading you correctly, your posisition is if a person or church uses the KJV in almost any capacity of authority, they or it is KJVO. That is a far stretch.

    Again as as best as best as I can remember, our senior pastor uses a Nestles-Aland NT in his NT sermon prep.
     
  3. John of Japan

    John of Japan Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,640
    Likes Received:
    1,834
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Don only asks questions of you on this thread, no one else. (I checked all his posts.) That is because you are hard to pin down in your criteria. IMHO, Don's questions are all legitimate. Why would they be hard to answer? :type:
     
  4. Don

    Don Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2000
    Messages:
    11,048
    Likes Received:
    321
    Faith:
    Baptist
    You listed 5 criteria; but you didn't list whether all 5 are required, or only 1 of the 5, or any particular combination.

    Pretty simple question; hard to understand why you don't just answer. If any of the 5 qualify, I'll be happy to address all 5. If only 1 or 2, or a combination, I'll be happy to address those.

    So - is it any? Or all? Or 2 out of 5, or 4 out of 5?
     
  5. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,371
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I assumed that was the crux of your question.
     
  6. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Okay, I'll play.
    I prefer the KJV over the NKJV is some instances, especially in the translation of the present passive participle. Also in the treatment of some of the qere/ketive pairs in the OT.
    How does God fulfilling His promise to preserve His people relate to the KJV?
    I believe the KJV is the inerrant word of God (in the derivative sense).
    No. There are no mistakes in the bible.
    Yes, I believe the Byzantine text form (of which the TR is a late derivative) is more likely to represent the autographs than the Alexandrian text form.

    So, what does that make me according to your criteria? :)
     
  7. Salty

    Salty 20,000 Posts Club
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2003
    Messages:
    38,981
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Faith:
    Baptist
  8. milby

    milby Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wow, do you guys really get that deep into it. I just rely on the Holy Spirit to speak to me through the Word. Do you speak like that (qere/ketive pairs) whatever the heck those are, when you are witnessing to someone who doesn't know the Lord?
     
  9. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,550
    Likes Received:
    15
    I hear that all the time in my profession and see many mistakes due to ignorance.

    Would you go to an undertaker (who has seen many more hearts than a heart surgeon) to get heart surgery or the doctor who knows how to do heart surgery?

    It is better to have more experience and knowledge than you need at the time than to not have enough and give out ignorance or nothing.

    Do you really think the Holy Spirit uses your ignorance?
     
  10. milby

    milby Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Are you really calling me ignorant cause I don't know what a qere/ketive pair is?:confused:
     
  11. milby

    milby Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    In case I am not the only "ignorant" one on the forum who didn't know what a qere/ketive pair was..this explaines it so that even I can understand it.

    "Something Qere is going on in the KJV"
    http://www.kjv-only.com/qere.html
     
  12. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    ONLY the originals are inerrant/inspired by/from God, and NO English versions are such!

    God preserved the original texts to us today, in the Greeks/Hebrew texts used to make translation today, but there ARE still some "mistakes" in KJV , or any other english version! Those mistakes would be from mainly numbering variations in OT texts, and scribal/textual insertions made over time!
     
  13. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Milby, please try to pay attention. We are not discussing witnessing. We are discussing KJVO as it relates to IFBs. :)
     
  14. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So, which facet of derivative inspiration do you deny? That the originals were inspired or that the vernaculars are derived from the originals?
    Are you certain there are errors in the bible or is it possible you just don't understand the full meaning of the text in question?
     
  15. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Yes. It is God's word. We ought to go deep, stay long, and come up refreshed. That is the whole point of God giving us the bible.
    How can you rely on the Holy Spirit to illuminate something you don't read, understand, and study?
    The subject is the KJV and IFBs, not witnessing. Didn't the Holy Spirit tell you? :)
     
  16. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    ONLY the originals were inspired by the Holy spirit, and they alone were fully inerrant!

    Copies of them that came to us today in the Critical/majority/TR texts and Hebrew text used to translate into english versions are extremely close to originals, NO mistakes that violate any doctrinal position, so they can in truth be regarded as the word of God to us today!

    and ANY English version off them can be regarded and seen as being authoritative and infallible!

    It is well known and accepted by even most conservatives that there are SOME minor mistakes in greek/hebrew text used, mainly in numbers and additions by scribes that were added in over time!

    and IF one held that the KJV is the word of God to us for today, so would be the ESV/NASB/NIV etc!
     
  17. milby

    milby Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    You got me there. Why bother witnessing when we can show everyone on a forum how smart we are. I think there is something about people like that in the bible. Weren't they called Pharisees?
     
  18. milby

    milby Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    I really can't believe you can mock the Holy Spirit so flippantly.
     
  19. milby

    milby Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually I started this thread and the question was simply....Now pay attention..... Are all fundamental churches King James Only?

    I really don't care what YOU prefer or what YOUR thoughts are on the issue of KJVO or other translations.
     
  20. gb93433

    gb93433 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,550
    Likes Received:
    15
    You are ignorant about that. People who are knowledgeable know what they do not know and do not blame their ignorance on the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is no substitute for preparation. I have never once seen God ever use ignorance in dealing with others.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...