Not so. I just showed scripture that says Jesus descended into the lower parts of the Earth.
Eph 4:9 (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?
The lower parts of the earth is the ground. It's not hell since hell is not located on the earth. Jesus first descended to earth, then returned to heaven.
Acts 2:31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.
The word here for "hell" is the word for "grave". "Hell" is a wrong interpretation. Jesus' soul did not stay in the grave nor did his body see corruption.
Matt 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
Last I read, Jesus' body was in the earth for 3 days. It never says His soul was there too.
There you go, three verses that say Jesus descended into the lower parts or heart of the earth. And Peter named this place as Hell.
Nope - not at all.
But where did Jesus tell the thief he would be that day?
Luke 23:43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.
Since Jesus commended His Spirit to God upon His death, we know He went to heaven with His Father and that is where the thief went too.
You may not like this, but the scriptures show Jesus descended into Hell. But Jesus also went to Paradise. So therefore they are the same place.
Completely wrong Scripturally.
And when you read Luke 16 you can see this. The rich man went to Hell, but was in torments. But Lazarus also died and went to Hell, but he was in Paradise. They were both in the heart of the Earth, but they were seperated by a great gulf, although they could see, hear, and speak to each other.
It is your interpretation but not consistent with Scripture.
(I'm answering fast because my computer is going to shut itself off in a couple of minutes - I HATE that it does this.)