• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Are Heaven and Paradise the same?

Johnv

New Member
A couple of problems with the concept of soul sleep post-resurrection.

1 - It contradicts the scripture contect of "absent with the body, present with the Lord".
2 - It presumes that Rev 21 is linear and literal.
3 - It presumes that, after our death, we are limited by the constraints of temporal laws (temporal laws are a constraint of the physical universe, not the spiritual).
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Do you know what it means to be "asleep in Christ"? Or not?:confused:

Apparently you do not. It certainly does not mean soul sleep.

God through the Apostle Paul tells us:

2 Corinthians 5:6. Therefore we are always confident, knowing that, whilst we are at home in the body, we are absent from the Lord:

2 Corinthians 5:8. We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord.

Philippians 1:21. For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain.

Philippians 1:23 For I am in a strait betwixt two, having a desire to depart, and to be with Christ; which is far better:

God through the Apostle John tells us:

Revelation 6:9-11
9. And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held:
10. And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?
11. And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.


Revelation 20:4. And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
 

Carico

New Member
Soul sleep is the doctrine of the Watchtower Society.

I've never once used the term "soul sleep". Only you have. I've used the term "asleep in Christ" which the bible uses. Don't you like the terminology of the bible?:confused: Would you prefer that I not use God's terminology?If so, why not?:confused:
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
I've never once used the term "soul sleep". Only you have. I've used the term "asleep in Christ" which the bible uses. Don't you like the terminology of the bible?:confused: Would you prefer that I not use God's terminology?If so, why not?:confused:

Then quit playing cutesy word games and tell what you understand "asleep in Christ" to mean.

I go to sleep in Jesus Christ every night, sleep all night in Jesus Christ, and wake up each morning in Jesus Christ. Some day my spirit/soul will go into the presence of the Triune God to await in conscious praise of God the resurrection of the glorified body.
 

Carico

New Member
Then quit playing cutesy word games and tell what you understand "asleep in Christ" to mean.

I go to sleep in Jesus Christ every night, sleep all night in Jesus Christ, and wake up each morning in Jesus Christ. Some day my spirit/soul will go into the presence of the Triune God to await in conscious praise of God the resurrection of the glorified body.

Don't patronize me. You're the one who's accusing me of things I didn't say. If you're going to be argumentative instead conversational, then I have no desire to converse with you. Asleep in Christ means that our flesh dies but Christ's Spirit in us lives on. Once we are born again of the Holy Spirit, that Spirit never dies. If you think he does, then you do not agree with Jesus that the HS is eternal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Don't patronize me. You're the one who's accusing me of things I didn't say. If you're going to be argumentative instead conversational, then I have no desire to converse with you. Asleep in Christ means that our body decays but Christ's spirit in us lives on. Once we are born again of the Holy Spirit, that Spirit never dies. If you think he does, then you do not agree with Jesus that we have eternal life inside of us.

Don't lie about what I said! I have made it perfectly clear that the spirit/soul of the dead believer goes immediately into the presence of God and that it is in a conscious state.

I never accused you of anything. I asked a very logical and simple question. You have used the phrase "asleep in Christ" in 4 posts and yet would not state how you interpreted that phrase. I call that being "cutesy".

Even with the above post you still have nor stated how you really understand the phrase "asleep in Christ". Though you say that the spirit of the believer never dies that does not answer the question as to whether or not you believe that the spirit/soul of the believer is in a conscious state or an unconscious state after the death of the body.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Carico

New Member
Don't lie about what I said! I have made it perfectly clear that the spirit/soul of the dead believer goes immediately into the presence of God and that it is in a conscious state.

I never accused you of anything. I asked a very logical and simple question. You have used the phrase "asleep in Christ" in 4 posts and yet would not state how you interpreted that phrase. I call that being "cutesy".

Even with the above post you still have nor stated how you really understand the phrase "asleep in Christ". Though you say that the spirit of the believer never dies that does not answer the question as to whether or not you believe that the spirit/soul of the believer is in a conscious state or an unconscious state after the death of the body.

No one asked me to interpret it! So I assumed people knew what it meant until you called what I said "soul sleep" which is a lie. Then I asked you what it means. Then you asked me what it means to be asleep in Christ and I answered you.

So instead of making false accusations about me to begin with all you needed to do was ask me what my interpretation of being "asleep in Christ means." So you're the one who's playing games and I have no desire to be a party to them any more.:rolleyes:
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Post #99
Read Rev. 21 about the New Jerusalem which is our final destination. It comes after the great white throne judgment at which time each of us will be called to account and take the particular "room" that Christ has prepared for us. before then, we will simply be asleep in Christ which is paradise, but not our final resting place. :)

Post #100
Are you advocating soul sleep?

Post #114
No one asked me to interpret it! So I assumed people knew what it meant until you called what I said "soul sleep" which is a lie. Then I asked you what it means. Then you asked me what it means to be asleep in Christ and I answered you.

So instead of making false accusations about me to begin with all you needed to do was ask me what my interpretation of being "asleep in Christ means." So you're the one who's playing games and I have no desire to be a party to them any more.:rolleyes:

You see Carico you are wrong! Your initial post regarding "asleep in Christ" was #99. I immediately ask your interpretation in Post #100. You posted the same phrase 3 additional times without providing an interpretation. Finally in your Post #112 you made an attempt which was still not definitive!
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Carico
After reading through these posts I agree with Old Regular.
Please clearly define the difference between the Biblical phrase "alive in Christ," and what others call "soul sleep." There is a big difference, and you need to be able to differentiate that difference. Can you put in words the difference between these two very much different doctrines.
 

Winman

Active Member
Winman

Your response ignores Ecclesiastes 12:7 as well as the ascension of Enoch and Elijah!

Enoch and Elijah did not die, so they would not go to the place of the dead before Christ's ascension.

Ecclesiastes 12:7 specifically states that the spirit/soul of man returns to God. As for Enoch and Elijah they were apparently taken to heaven in bodily form.

Ecclesiastes 12:7 Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.

I am not ignoring this verse, I believe every word of God. But you are lifting this one verse out of context. What do verses 1-6 say?

Ecc 12:1 Remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth, while the evil days come not, nor the years draw nigh, when thou shalt say, I have no pleasure in them;
2 While the sun, or the light, or the moon, or the stars, be not darkened, nor the clouds return after the rain:
3 In the day when the keepers of the house shall tremble, and the strong men shall bow themselves, and the grinders cease because they are few, and those that look out of the windows be darkened,
4 And the doors shall be shut in the streets, when the sound of the grinding is low, and he shall rise up at the voice of the bird, and all the daughters of musick shall be brought low;
5 Also when they shall be afraid of that which is high, and fears shall be in the way, and the almond tree shall flourish, and the grasshopper shall be a burden, and desire shall fail: because man goeth to his long home, and the mourners go about the streets:
6 Or ever the silver cord be loosed, or the golden bowl be broken, or the pitcher be broken at the fountain, or the wheel broken at the cistern.


Look at verse 2. When has the sun, the light, the moon, and stars been darkened? This is speaking of the time after the tribulation. Notice it says "in the day" when the keepers of the house will tremble, and the strong men will bow themselves. This is not speaking of the death of an individual man.

Matt 24:29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.


John Gill writes of this passage as I have stated before:

The judgment is future.

Matt 11:22 But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you.

Rev 14:7 Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters.


Furthermore, you completely misinterpret the passage from Luke. I believe that this passage is a parable and Verse 31 refers to the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ. Even though He rose from the dead He was still rejected and is still rejected by most Jews. John Gill also writes of this passage:

Well, I do not believe Luke 16 is a parable and neither do many Bible scholars. Parables do not mention specific men by name.

Now what does Gill say about Ephesians 4:9 from the passage you presented:

Ephesians 4:8-10
8. Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men.
9. (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?
10. He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.)

Ver. 9. Now that he ascended, &c.] These words are a conclusion of Christ's descent from heaven, from his ascension thither; for had he not first descended from thence, it could not have been said of him that he ascended; for no man hath ascended to heaven but he that came down from heaven, Joh 3:13 and they are also an explanation of the sense of the psalmist in the above citation, which takes in his humiliation as well as his exaltation; which humiliation is signified by his descent into the earth:

what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth? this the Papists understand of his decent into a place they call Limbus Patrum, which they make to be contiguous to hell; and where they say the patriarchs were detained till Christ's coming; and that he went thither to deliver them out of it; and that these are the captivity he led captive; all which is fictitious and fabulous: for certain it is, that the place where Abraham was with Lazarus in his bosom was not near to hell, but afar off, and that there was a great gulf between them, Lu 16:23,26 and the spirits or souls of the patriarchs returned to God that gave them, when separated from their bodies, as the souls of men do now, Ec 12:7 nor did Christ enter any such feigned place at his death, but went to paradise, where the penitent thief was that day with him; nor were the patriarchs, but the principalities and powers Christ spoiled, the captivity he led captive and triumphed over: some interpret this of Christ's descent into hell, which must be understood not locally, but of his enduring the wrath of God for sin, which was equivalent to the torments of hell, and of his being in the state of the dead; but it may rather design the whole of his humiliation, as his descent from heaven and incarnation in the virgin's womb, where his human nature was curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth; and his humbling himself and becoming obedient unto death, even the death of the cross, when he was made sin and a curse for his people, and bore all the punishment due to their transgressions; and his being in Hades, in the state of the dead, in the grave, in the heart of the earth, as Jonah in the whale's belly: reference seems to be had to Ps 139:15 where "the lower parts of the earth", is interpreted by the Targum on the place of amad aoyrk, "his mother's womb"; and so it is by Jarchi, Aben Ezra, Kimchi, and Ben Melec. The Alexandrian copy and the Ethiopic version leave out the word "first" in this clause.

Well, I don't know what the Papists believe, but the scriptures say Jesus descended into the lower parts of the earth, that's good enough for me. You know, the Catholics aren't in error on everything, on some things they are correct. And the very verses contradict what your man Gill says, in Eph 4:9 it explains that the ascension being spoken of was connected to Christ first descending into the lower parts of the earth.

Eph 4:9 (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?

Sorry Winman but I have to believe Scripture such as Ecclesiastes 12:7 and the passages regarding Enoch and Elijah rather than you. Also I must accept Gill's interpretation of certain passages rather than yours, particularly since I believe yours to be incorrect.

That's OK, this is a difficult subject that has caused controversy for centuries. But I believe that before Christ ascended to heaven and offered his blood on the Mercy Seat that all men went to hell when they died. But at that time hell was sectioned off into one compartment of torment for the unsaved, and a seperate compartment for the saved called Paradise or Abrahams' bosom.

The fact is, the scriptures say Jesus went down into hell.

Psa 16:10 For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.

And Peter repeated this verse in Acts 2 and added this to it:

Acts 2:29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day.
30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;
31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.


Now, if Jesus went to Hell (and the scriptures say he did), when did he go? After he died on the cross. And where did Jesus promise the thief he would be the very day Jesus was crucified? PARADISE. So there you go, Paradise was part of Hell.

Think about it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
Enoch and Elijah did not die, so they would not go to the place of the dead before Christ's ascension.
Where did they go then...and why would this be any different than dying first? Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
The facts in this debate...

1. There is clear Scripture equating paradise and Heaven.
2. There is no clear Scripture separating Abraham's Bosom from Heaven.
 

Winman

Active Member
Not so. I just showed scripture that says Jesus descended into the lower parts of the Earth.

Eph 4:9 (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth?

Acts 2:31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.

Matt 12:40 For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

There you go, three verses that say Jesus descended into the lower parts or heart of the earth. And Peter named this place as Hell.

But where did Jesus tell the thief he would be that day?

Luke 23:43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.

You may not like this, but the scriptures show Jesus descended into Hell. But Jesus also went to Paradise. So therefore they are the same place.

And when you read Luke 16 you can see this. The rich man went to Hell, but was in torments. But Lazarus also died and went to Hell, but he was in Paradise. They were both in the heart of the Earth, but they were seperated by a great gulf, although they could see, hear, and speak to each other.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top