What you need to do is let the Bible shape your theology, not interpret the Bible through the lens of your theology. I trust someday soon you'll attend a good Bible college and take courses in hermeneutics and exegesis and Greek and Hebrew. Then maybe you'll get over this tendency.christianyouth said:JoJ, Germany lost WW2 because they were fighting wars on too many fronts. It's the same thing with me. My posts have been haphazardly put together, havn't had time to research facts and the like, and I have been debating in atleast three threads, not able to give sufficient time to either of them. I see no point to continue with the debating, since I already know each of these issues will come down to Calvinism v Arminianism.
Let me pose this question : Does how I live my life have any affect upon God's bringing his elect to saving faith? Is peoples salvation contingent upon how I exemplify Christ?
Now, let's watch were this goes. :thumbs:
In answer to your question about the verse, that verse can be interpreted two ways.
1) The wifes godly conduct somehow impacts his decision to convert
or
2) The wife is able to share the Gospel with him.
I don't really know which way to interpret it. The verse seems to be saying #1, but that would go against my understanding of regeneration, that is people are dead in sins, then quickened when exposed to Gospel preaching.
There is really no other way to interpret the passage other than your (1) above. It specifically says, "without the word." Now interpreting Scripture with Scripture, we know that no one is saved without the Gospel. However, it is very clear from this passage that our lives influence people towards or away from Christ. To deny this is to deny the plain sense of Scripture.
It is a characteristic of youth that they think they have all the answers. I was the same way 35 years ago, of course.JoJ, it really is not an issue of backing out of something I started. I am just seeing that this is going to, absolutley will, come down to an issue in theology. It is the same with Church Growth methodology, or easy believism. I've seen those threads, and I've seen articles on them, and I know that it always comes down to a Calvinist v Non-Calvinist battle.
Frankly, though, you need to admit that your ignorance of theology is great. I asked you to show me how Arminian theology produces lifestyle evangelism. You haven't. You won't be able to, but go ahead and try. If you don't even try I will continue to think you have backed out of something you started.
Now to be honest, I don't participate in the C/A debates, and I won't here. But I will go so far as to debate with you the source of LE practice without discussing the right and wrong per se of C or A. I gave you a quote on my side from well known Calvinist J. I. Packer. I double dog dare you to produce any quotes on your side from a genuine Calvinist theologian on how Arminianism produces LE.
It's very easy to give opinions and then say you won't go any further because you know how the discussion will turn out. But that's not debate.
Hoping for a mature answer.... :type: