1689Dave
Well-Known Member
Lot's of false doctrine on Got Questions going way back.Nope. He’s reformed, Falwell wasn’t.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Lot's of false doctrine on Got Questions going way back.Nope. He’s reformed, Falwell wasn’t.
You aren’t teaching the amillennialist position. Amillennialism teaches that the millennium, the 1,000 years mentioned six times in Revelation 20:1-7, is symbolic of an extended period of time and not to be taken as a literal 1,000 years. All four eschatological systems address this passage as the millennium, but two view it literally(premillennialism, both Dispensationial and Historic) and two view it symbolically(postmillennialism and amillenialism).Jesus teaches a perfect form of Amillennialism in the gospels. But nobody seems to care.
IIRC, they are pre-trib, but I could be wrong.Lot's of false doctrine on Got Questions going way back.
A-millennialism = NO Millennium. You are teaching millennialism. Jesus did not. Why work promoting Pharisaic ideas when scripture NEVER mentions a millennium?You aren’t teaching the amillennialist position. Amillennialism teaches that the millennium, the 1,000 years mentioned six times in Revelation 20:1-7, is symbolic of an extended period of time and not to be taken as a literal 1,000 years. All four eschatological systems address this passage as the millennium, but two view it literally(premillennialism, both Dispensationial and Historic) and two view it symbolically(postmillennialism and amillenialism).
You’re not teaching the amillennial view. I’ve provided you with quotes and links to show you what it teaches, yet you persist in error.A-millennialism = NO Millennium. You are teaching millennialism. Jesus did not. Why work promoting Pharisaic ideas when scripture NEVER mentions a millennium?
Jesus taught Amillennialism. That's what I teach. You teach the Catholic, Lutheran, And Reformed views. You need to mirror what Jesus says.You’re not teaching the amillennial view. I’ve provided you with quotes and links to show you what it teaches, yet you persist in error.
Jesus taught Amillennialism. That's what I teach. You teach the Catholic, Lutheran, And Reformed views. You need to mirror what Jesus says.
Well, I’m done with him. I’ve given him ample evidence of what Amillennialism teaches and it does not align itself with what he believes.The term millennium comes from the Latin word for 1000.
This thread is not about that.Start a thread about your ideas as you have not responded to anything on this thread.Jesus teaches a perfect form of Amillennialism in the gospels. But nobody seems to care.
Yes you have.Well, I’m done with him. I’ve given him ample evidence of what Amillennialism teaches and it does not align itself with what he believes.
And that is the point of difference from Pre-Millennialsm. Revelation 20:2-6.. . . amillennialism . . . they just believe that it 's not a literal 1,000-year period.
Amillennialism = No Millennium. Scripture does not even mention a Millennium. Jesus taught the purest form of Amillennialism there is. All of the "Amillennial Churches" teach a corrupted view based on denominational churchism that does not exist in scripture.What you are teaching is not Amillennialism and certainly not what Jesus taught. @Martin Marprelate is Amill, so ask him who has the correct view.
The kingdom of God is here now, and it is here in time. Time is the millennium, which is symbolic. It’s not to be taken as a literal, future 1,000 year reign of Christ, as Christ is ruling now.
I'm not speaking about assorted eschatological teaching being wrong for the most part? And comparing it to the truth?This thread is not about that.Start a thread about your ideas as you have not responded to anything on this thread.