Who said it was?Originally posted by donnA:
Karen I didn't imply anything about you. I simply said I don't think it's right to show a child pictures of torn and mutalated babies.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Who said it was?Originally posted by donnA:
Karen I didn't imply anything about you. I simply said I don't think it's right to show a child pictures of torn and mutalated babies.
Originally posted by Thankful:
Respectfully, DHK, DonnA is expressing her opinion, no naming names or saying that anyone else said this. She is talking generalities not specifically anyone on this Board.
Granny can have her opinion in this debate and I believe others can have their opinion also.
There is nothing wrong with that opinion, except that it implies that there are people here doing that. Otherwise why would it be expressed? I don't see anyone advocating a teaching method of showing young children pictures of torn and mutilated babies for the purpose of teaching them about aborton and homosexuality.I simply said I don't think it's right to show a child pictures of torn and mutalated babies.
Looks like they were talking about this post above.Originally posted by GrannyGumbo:
I would like to encourage you to keep on telling it like it is, lifeandliberty. Being part of a street ministry is the most fulfilling thing I've ever done. Our preachers, young and old, are out there in any kind of weather and the battle is fierce.
When we take the abortion/murder pictures out, I hold baby Malachi. He preaches! My young grandsons who stand beside me are not afraid to hold a sign that says Sodomite Sin is Filthy. I hold one that says Did God Burn the Sodomy or the Sodomite. We also hold signs that have salvation scripture.
We are constantly harassed by the police wherever we go and my pastor has been arrested a time or two for preaching. I've been shoved and threatened.
http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/news/story.aspx?cid=3419
1Pe 2:11 (KJV) Dearly beloved, I beseech [you] as strangers and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts, which war against the soul;
1Pe 2:12 (KJV) Having your conversation honest among the Gentiles: that, whereas they speak against you as evildoers, they may by [your] good works, which they shall behold, glorify God in the day of visitation. {whereas: or, wherein}
1Pe 2:13 (KJV) Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme;
1Pe 2:14 (KJV) Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well.
1Pe 2:15 (KJV) For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men:
1Pe 2:16 (KJV) As free, and not using [your] liberty for a cloke of maliciousness, but as the servants of God. {using: Gr. having}
1Pe 2:17 (KJV) Honour all [men]. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honour the king. {Honour all: or, Esteem all}
1Pe 2:18 (KJV) Servants, [be] subject to [your] masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward.
1Pe 2:19 (KJV) For this [is] thankworthy, if a man for conscience toward God endure grief, suffering wrongfully. {thankworthy: or, thank}
1Pe 2:20 (KJV) For what glory [is it], if, when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye shall take it patiently? but if, when ye do well, and suffer [for it], ye take it patiently, this [is] acceptable with God. {acceptable: or, thank}
1Pe 2:21 (KJV) For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps: {for us: some read, for you}
1Pe 2:22 (KJV) Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth:
1Pe 2:23 (KJV) Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed [himself] to him that judgeth righteously: {himself: or, his cause}
2Pe 2:7 (KJV) And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:
2Pe 2:8 (KJV) (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed [his] righteous soul from day to day with [their] unlawful deeds
2Pe 2:9 (KJV) The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:
2Pe 2:10 (KJV) But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous [are they], selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities. {government: or, dominion}
2Pe 2:11 (KJV) Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord. {them: some read, themselves}
It's education. Again, at what age do you think children are old enough to be educated about this?Originally posted by donnA:
Showing a child a picture of a torn, mangled human child, and telling them what homosexuality is is abuse in my book. I don't care what kids today know and don't know, for one who is supose to be a responsable parent or grandparent thats pretty sick.
Yes, thank you, Brother Craigbythesea for steering us back into the topic of the OPer---a public library is that---public! Its open to the public. Its funded by the public! Its funded by public taxes. The books are not "ours" to do as we will---the books are the public's. One Library rule----is---you return the book in the same condition as you checked it out----nothing more added---nothing more taken away!Originally posted by Craigbythesea:
Christians should behave themselves in public libraries and every place else. If you want a library with your rules, open your own library and pay all the expenses—but don’t open it in my town or we will tar and feather you drive you out of town!
![]()
![]()
Should this have some commas in it or did you mean that you really do enjoy antagonizing people?I have had too great success with all of the methods readily available to just antagonize people.
Would it be sick if they saw such photos in a Jewish Holocaust museum? I'm certain you would applaud the effort to educate children about it.Originally posted by donnA:
Showing a child a picture of a torn, mangled human child, and telling them what homosexuality is is abuse in my book. I don't care what kids today know and don't know, for one who is supose to be a responsable parent or grandparent thats pretty sick.
She doesn't have to teach to know. Wasn't she taught in one?Originally posted by Frogman:
Again I ask, do you teach, or have you ever taught in a public School?
Would it be sick if they saw such photos in a Jewish Holocaust museum? I'm certain you would applaud the effort to educate children about it.Originally posted by Aaron:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by donnA:
Showing a child a picture of a torn, mangled human child, and telling them what homosexuality is is abuse in my book. I don't care what kids today know and don't know, for one who is supose to be a responsable parent or grandparent thats pretty sick.
If this was done it was not done (as far as I know) to a child. It was done in the context of a protest with the intended target audience of those getting an abortion or concerned about abortions--hardly children. This is not the education of children! So put things in their proper context. In no way can this be construed as the education of children in either homosexuality or abortion, so why is the implication there, that it is?Showing a child a picture of a torn, mangled human child, and telling them what homosexuality is is abuse in my book.
Should this have some commas in it or did you mean that you really do enjoy antagonizing people?Originally posted by I Am Blessed 16:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> I have had too great success with all of the methods readily available to just antagonize people.