Ray Berrian
New Member
Bible-boy,
You said, '2) The passage no where uses the phrase "slain in the Spirit" to describe what happened to John. Additionally, John's testimony recorded in this passage makes it clear that he was in the manifest presence of the exalted Lord Jesus Christ. Nowhere does the text indicate that the Holy Spirit, the third person of the Triune Godhead, had also manifested His presence. The text only indicates that the exalted Lord Jesus was present. Therefore, why would it be acceptable to state that the presence of the Holy Spirit caused John to fall?'
You said, '2) The passage no where uses the phrase "slain in the Spirit" to describe what happened to John. Additionally, John's testimony recorded in this passage makes it clear that he was in the manifest presence of the exalted Lord Jesus Christ. Nowhere does the text indicate that the Holy Spirit, the third person of the Triune Godhead, had also manifested His presence. The text only indicates that the exalted Lord Jesus was present. Therefore, why would it be acceptable to state that the presence of the Holy Spirit caused John to fall?'
.I agree that I was not clear in that it might have sounded like those who fall under the power of the Spirit also have the ability of Divine inspiration to write new books of the Bible. However, often I have said on this board that the canon of Scripture is forever closed. Just for a point of clarity . . .
Both things are stated in the Word. John did see the Lord in all of His beauty and wonder but 1:10 also says that the apostle was '. . . in the Spirit on the Lord's Day.' We do agree that the Spirit is the Holy Spirit, right? The Holy Spirit did not duck out or withdraw while John was in this unique rapture with the living God.
In vs. 10 first John speaks of being in the Holy Spirit and only down in vs. 11 is there the voice of the Lord. Wherever the Holy Spirit is manifest, there too are to be found the Father and the Son. We do not divide the Essence of God if we are Trinitarian.
I don't think you want to say that in vs. 17 that Jesus was there and the Holy Spirit and God the Father were having a private conversation together in Heaven until Jesus returned.
The bottom line is people who fall under the power of God experience the same thing as the Apostle John did in this first chapter of Revelation.
Some of us Christians have experience this but are not given new revelations of truth. The canon is closed!! And yet if you asked each person their personal experience in God--it might vary; I cannot tell you what other saved people have experienced. That is between them and the Lord.
But to deny this experience is like me telling you that you do not know you are saved. You know because in some way your life has experienced the result of your personal salvation. Plus, you have your own salvation story to tell saints and sinners alike
