I doubt you will find anyone on here who does not believe God can do what He wishes.That's Paul argument in Romans 9. God may do as He wishes.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I doubt you will find anyone on here who does not believe God can do what He wishes.That's Paul argument in Romans 9. God may do as He wishes.
What if I say I am master of the universe, I told God the only thing he is allowed to do is TULIP.
You see the twist is, God does not have free will. He is limited to my prison I established. He doesn't have the power to do thing any other way.
Is it POSSIBLE, does God have the capacity to run existence in a different manner then you expect?
I don't agree with Arminianism but I would be fool to insist God could not run an Arminianism system if he wanted to.
I know a Calvinist believes God is running a Calvinist system, that aside I want to know does a Calvinist believe that God could run a different system if he wanted to, is it within his power?
Sovereignty, POWER. If these things were like guns and handed sovereignty and power to the devil. There is plenty of folks out there who would follow the devil.
Because their priority is POWER and Sovereignty and an idolatry to power and sovereignty.
1 John 4 God is love. I would stick with God no matter how helpless one counts love to be. I believe that kindness, love and compassion are the highest priorities.
Yes, which would mean He can do anything not against his nature.That's Paul argument in Romans 9. God may do as He wishes.
Yes, which would mean He can do anything not against his nature.
This sounds backward to me, I mean from a biblical perspective. Would they say this of the sun and stars as well?I think if you read the Reformers more and the Reformed Puritan English more and the Reformed Particular Baptists more with understanding; you would come to find realize that God's "kindness, love, and compassion" are all displayed as subordinate to and flowing out of His Glory. God's receiving his Glory is His highest priority.
Yes, for you and for me, I'm sure that is true. However, I have found that this does not hold true in general. Some of the most obvious things to me are anything but to some others.That goes without saying.
you would come to find realize that God's "kindness, love, and compassion" are all displayed as subordinate to and flowing out of His Glory.
God's receiving his Glory is His highest priority.
utilyan,
Dear Brother, I think if you read the Reformers more and the Reformed Puritan English more and the Reformed Particular Baptists more with understanding; you would come to find realize that God's "kindness, love, and compassion" are all displayed as subordinate to and flowing out of His Glory. God's receiving his Glory is His highest priority.
That Glory is now in the face of our Lovely Lord Jesus and in His Gospel. Hallelujah!! Praise to the Lamb! What a Christmas worship moment it is for to ponder and type this today of all days. Worthy is the Lamb and worthy of praise, and laud, and honor. For the Lord God omnipotent reigns!!
rd
I propose that it is because:
1. They do not believe in the sovereignty of god but the "sovereignty of sinners" because of their high view of man
tantamount to those who hold to "modernism" of the 1920s. This is expressed in the so called "free will of man" to choose God when he has his own capricious spirit.
2. They do not believe in the absolute depravity of man, for they think and really do believe that they can choose God at their time and place not His. They also rebel against the depraved mankind doctrine because (some not all) believe they really are good in some sense. They do not need to be on the Baptist Board but probably need to be on a Methodist Board where they believe in some level of personal holiness and perfectionism.
If they really did believe in the absolute Sovereignty of God and absolute Depravity of Man they would repent and become some kind of Particular Redemptionists either Reformed or Baptistic. Or if they ever saw God in his splendor and glory and how that magnified their absolute separation from Him in our sin; we too would call for the rocks to fall on us and cry aloud for mercy.
The arguments we have (IMHO!), should not be over the fundamentals but over "What is the Gospel?"
Excuse me, I am only ranting in R. C. Sproul's absence.
I have said too much now and will take more heat probably than I have shown light.
My humble opinion. Take it or leave it.
rd
1 John 4 God is love. I would stick with God no matter how helpless one counts love to be. I believe that kindness, love and compassion are the highest priorities.
Dear Brother, I think if you read the Reformers more and the Reformed Puritan English more and the Reformed Particular Baptists more with understanding; you would come to find realize that God's "kindness, love, and compassion" are all displayed as subordinate to and flowing out of His Glory.
This caught my attention.Presbyterians do not think that Baptists can be Reformed, but they have no problem admitting that Baptists can be Calvinists.
John Nelson Darby was a Calvinist. He believed in the doctrines of grace, even though he is often called the "father of Dispensationalism". Darby was also an influential member of the Plymouth Brethren, So, I stand by my comments.
God is almighty. God hates sin. Because of our sin, all of humanity are low down, wicked, hateful, depraved, filthy, sorry sinners, condemned and bound for Hell with no hope. But God, in His boundless and marvelous grace, sent His only begotten Son to die for our sins and all we have to do is believe and trust Him to save us. If you have not trusted Jesus as Savior, God will put you in Hell at the end of your life and in the Lake of Fire at the end of the Great White Throne judgement. If that isn't "sovereign" I don't know what is.
I'm an Independent Baptist, saved and baptized in an Independent, Fundamental, Premillennial, King James Bible church on May 11, 1986. I do not "hate" the TRUE sovereignty of God as I just described in this post.
How does God assert His sovereignty in salvation? I just posted it. I will see if I can explain it better: God sent His Word and His Holy Ghost into this world. The Holy Ghost "reproves" the world of "sin, righteousness and judgment". In other words, while the Holy Ghost is dealing with your heart and you fail to acknowledge that you're a sinner and turn to His Holy, pure and spotless Lamb, Jesus Christ in faith, God will judge you in Hell. The "Calvinists", "reformed", "fatalists", "particular redemptionists" (or whatever else they will admit to being at the time), say that we are "exalting man" by this doctrine. Actually, No. it does not exhalt man.. To be selfish enough about your own sorry hide to admit that you are a lowdown, hateful, scum of the earth, vile sinner and cry out to Jesus for mercy from the depths of your heart, is NOT exalting man. But I will say this: to say that God only had enough love for a few, and knowingly created the rest or simply ignored or "passed up" the rest so that they could burn in Hell for "His glory" DEGRADES the God of the Bible into some selfish monster. THAT is what we reject.I'm not certain that there is much disagreement between this statement and that of many who hold to the doctrines of Grace.
It is just the matters relating to the "how" not the "what."
For example, most of the IFB churches actually hold to the total depravity of the human condition just as you described, the effectual working of Grace in Redemption, the preservation / perseverance of the redeemed, and the election of believers (as one friend put it "written no the gate of salvation is "whosoever" and when one walks through and looks back it reads "chosen in Him from the foundation of the world") .
What many become exercised over is that the Sovereignty of God is some special indicator of Calvinism and not available for anyone who is not Calvinistic.
Disputes arise and resolve as to the "how" not the "what."
How does God assert His sovereignty in salvation? I just posted it. I will see if I can explain it better: God sent His Word and His Holy Ghost into this world. The Holy Ghost "reproves" the world of "sin, righteousness and judgment". In other words, while the Holy Ghost is dealing with your heart and you fail to acknowledge that you're a sinner and turn to His Holy, pure and spotless Lamb, Jesus Christ in faith, God will judge you in Hell.
The "Calvinists", "reformed", "fatalists", "particular redemptionists" (or whatever else they will admit to being at the time), say that we are "exalting man" by this doctrine.
To be selfish enough about your own sorry hide to admit that you are a lowdown, hateful, scum of the earth, vile sinner and cry out to Jesus for mercy from the depths of your heart, is NOT exalting man.
to say that God only had enough love for a few, and knowingly created the rest or simply ignored or "passed up" the rest so that they could burn in Hell for "His glory" DEGRADES the God of the Bible into some selfish monster. THAT is what we reject.
Did God love Cain? Pharaoh? Herod? Hitler? Stalin? Charles Manson? Yes, or no? If you say "yes" I will believe you. Otherwise, you have "exposed" nothing. I will tell you what I believe so you will know. I believe God IS love. Love IS His character. He even went so far as to command us to "love our enemies" in order to be "like our Father in heaven".. NOW we finally reach our point of disagreement. FIRST, no Calvinist believes that God only has enough love for a few. God's love is part of His holy character. I will not bother to get into a back-and-forth with you on the scope and intent of the atonement, for you will simply dismiss whatever I say. Suffice to say that I have already exposed your mischaracterization of the Calvinist position. That is enough for now.
How does God assert His sovereignty in salvation? I just posted it. I will see if I can explain it better: God sent His Word and His Holy Ghost into this world. The Holy Ghost "reproves" the world of "sin, righteousness and judgment". In other words, while the Holy Ghost is dealing with your heart and you fail to acknowledge that you're a sinner and turn to His Holy, pure and spotless Lamb, Jesus Christ in faith, God will judge you in Hell.
The "Calvinists", "reformed", "fatalists", "particular redemptionists" (or whatever else they will admit to being at the time), say that we are "exalting man" by this doctrine. Actually, No. it does not exhalt man.. To be selfish enough about your own sorry hide to admit that you are a lowdown, hateful, scum of the earth, vile sinner and cry out to Jesus for mercy from the depths of your heart, is NOT exalting man.
But I will say this: to say that God only had enough love for a few, and knowingly created the rest or simply ignored or "passed up" the rest so that they could burn in Hell for "His glory" DEGRADES the God of the Bible into some selfish monster. THAT is what we reject.
Did God love Cain? Pharaoh? Herod? Hitler? Stalin? Charles Manson? Yes, or no? If you say "yes" I will believe you. Otherwise, you have "exposed" nothing.
Read my words and understand what I meant. What did I write? What did I mean?Did God love Cain? Pharaoh? Herod? Hitler? Stalin? Charles Manson? Yes, or no? If you say "yes" I will believe you. Otherwise, you have "exposed" nothing. I will tell you what I believe so you will know. I believe God IS love. Love IS His character. He even went so far as to command us to "love our enemies" in order to be "like our Father in heaven".
So if you agree that God DID love Charles Manson, Pharaoh, Stalin and all sinners for that matter, then tell me why YOU think God would forego "enabling" these loved ones to respond to the Gospel?