Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes, but if you heard her interview she also mentioned that divorce was never an option but murder was a time or two. Also God used another man to reach her husband.Originally posted by Eladar:
If the wife hangs around in attempt to save her husband from damnation, then it could be argued that she was being beaten for her faith in Jesus Christ. My wife was telling me about Reba McEntire's sister who did hang around and her husband did come around and no longer abuses her. I'm sure that you find this example ridiculous, but that does not mean it could never happen. It took 15 years, but it did happen.
That is the law in many states. It should never be up to the victim to expose the abuser. Just as it should not be up to a victim of a theft or violent action to decide if he wants to see the person prosecuted.Originally posted by Eladar:
You obviously believe that the victim should have no right to decide if the abuse should be reported or not.
This takes us back to whether or not the woman has the ability to carry her cross if she is willing to try to reach her husband. Yes, God is at work in both the husband and wife's life. Either way this is true, but it seems to me that the cut and run people don't want to admit that even if the woman stays God is still there.Yes, but if you heard her interview she also mentioned that divorce was never an option but murder was a time or two.
This is true for every sinner.Some do come around and some don't. But I believe every abuser can change but the choice is his.
I have no problem with that.Most will not change until put to the test. If the man will not expsoe himself the church must step in and deal with him.
It seems that those deacons did not pass their test.That is where there are too many whimps in the church who call themselves leaders. Amazing how when I would bring it up at a deacons meeting how many would run.
How is calling the cops not exposing the abuser?That is the law in many states. It should never be up to the victim to expose the abuser.
This is where we disagree. I believe the person being wronged is the exact person who should get to decide if the act gets prosecuted or not.Just as it should not be up to a victim of a theft or violent action to decide if he wants to see the person prosecuted.
That is the law in many states. It should never be up to the victim to expose the abuser. Just as it should not be up to a victim of a theft or violent action to decide if he wants to see the person prosecuted. </font>[/QUOTE]__________________________________________________Originally posted by gb93433:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Eladar:
You obviously believe that the victim should have no right to decide if the abuse should be reported or not.
I believe this is a very important aspect to the discussion. It brings to mind 1 Corinthians 6:1-11By this rationale it appears to me you automatically disqualify the possibility for the victim to forgive their offender.
You eliminate the chance for the victim to forgive and forget, thereby giving the offender the chance to amend his ways and to see true christian charity.
I agree completely.OTOH, I do not support the idea of disolving a possibly good marriage due to abuse. Our ONLY goal ought to be restoration and forgiveness.
I would say that she should be given the opportunity of sanctuary. There is still 1Cor. 7:10-16.A woman who has been beat repeatedly ought to be given sanctuary from the man who shows a pattern of beatings. But the marriage SHOULD NEVER be disolved before a genuine attempt at restoration and healing and forgiveness.