Reformed1689
Well-Known Member
Time will tell. Hopefully you are wrong. Otherwise, justice has not been served and the election truly was stolen.And the possibility is somewhere around 1,000,000,000,000,000 to 1.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Time will tell. Hopefully you are wrong. Otherwise, justice has not been served and the election truly was stolen.And the possibility is somewhere around 1,000,000,000,000,000 to 1.
justice has not been served and the election truly was stolen.
The Republicans, Trump's own party, agreed to the changes. It was after Trump lost, months after the changes were made, that they threw up the "constitutionality" argument. What a bunch of sore losers.
acolytes
It does not simply mean follower."Acolyte" is a fancy synonym for "follower". Learned it while watching the TV series, "The Following".
No, it's the evidence is there and liberals and those who align themselves with them ignore the evidence because it suits their purposes to have the election stolen and illegal voting.Just a bunch of sour grapes. What a bunch of sore losers.
It does not simply mean follower.
Here's what I was working off of:True. See definition 1 below.
This is what Merriam-Webster online has:
"Definition of acolyte
1: one who assists a member of the clergy in a liturgical service by performing minor duties
2: one who attends or assists a leader : FOLLOWER"
It doesn't matter whether any political party agreed to changes when those changes were unconstitutional. Election officials ignored the statutory bar on inspecting ballots before election day, then illegally provided voter information to third parties and allowed curing of the ballots. In PA, these illegal practices occurred only in Democratic strongholds, with Republicans following the law. The law states that it is the state legislature - not administration agencies, election officials, or even courts - that is charged with selecting electors. I quoted this paragraph from this Federalist link - 6 Things To Know About Texas’s Supreme Court Petition On The Election.The Republicans, Trump's own party, agreed to the changes. It was after Trump lost, months after the changes were made, that they threw up the "constitutionality" argument. What a bunch of sore losers.