Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston to Get $300,000 for First Pics of Baby

[LeBuick]

So, unless you are admitting that the press is in the pockets of a candidate.... just because the liberalness of one is identified doesn't establish its connection to the other......

Actually, Republican's have more money and I believe if they were really worried about press coverage they would by more media. Instead, they chose to call themselves the victim when and if an article appears negative to their position.

but you are a liberal and therefore your view is lending credibility to the view that both parties and press and in together when you read 'liberal press' (which is one entity) but you recognize it and defend as an attack on another, like a candidate or a party....

Shows what you know. I have said many times, I am unaffiliated. I don't belong to either party and have voted for both parties. I voted for Bush the first go around because I thought he was the right man at the time. Though I voted for Bush, I still didn't like excluding American's votes because of a hanging chad. Fair is fair no matter how you voted.

..... and that is that you are overly sensitive and defensive......

I'm over sensitive and defensive???

As in your more recent post..... just because a person doesn't go around talking about Craig, or Stevens, or Rove doesn't mean they aren't conscious of problems in people of other parties besides the liberal/socialist Party.

My point was how can one only see the faults or point out the faults or corruption in one party without listing those in their own party. To do so is to imply your party is so good that they have room to condemn the other. My statement was that both parties has corruption which is a very true statement.

But it is funny how you and others of your ilk will draw from McCains' past and mention his about 30 years ago divorce and remarriage.......

And you can show me where I spoke negatively about McCain's divorce and remarriage? I think you're confusing me with someone else since I wouldn't consider that a problem when choosing a president. A pastor, YES. A president, no way. I believe it's the conservatives who keep bringing Christian standards into the selection of a candidate. Now IF I did bring it up, it would be in the light of the GOP presenting themselves as the party of family values.

when faith girl only mentions his association with the KKK and that there was no judgenment.... which is what I take 'no eyebrows risen' to mean.

Her use of no eyebrows being raised was implying this should be made news or held against them which is being judgmental.

I really don't understand your whine... nor why a thread regarding two barely grown adults and their family gets you involved with a candidate when the onlly mention before that point was related to the curiousity of the press. What a noodle! What a wimp!

Carpro said they should be compensated for how the liberal media treated them when the news first broke. My response simply said if we're going to start compensating folks for how they are treated by media then Obama should likewise be compensated. I went on to say Palin should be likewise compensated.

Browse over to WND and see how he is still being called a Muslim as if to say a Muslim can't be president of the US. They still question his citizenship when his state officials have said he was born in HI.

I agree with you, there should be no compensation so your comment about whine, noodles and wimps should be directed at Carpro since he is the one who brought compensation in the discussion. That was where the whine came in. I simply made sarcasm about his whine.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

I didn't assume. I asked. Go back and look if you don't believe me. At least two others did as well before the thread was prematurely shut down. So there is nothing for you to resent.

There is. I told you I had no reason, it was a CNN newsstory, and you called me a liar.

Are you going to bring that up often ? You brought it into this thread.

 

[Pastor Larry]

There is. I told you I had no reason, it was a CNN newsstory, and you called me a liar.

Where did I call you a liar? Would you mind linking to that so I can see it? I don't recall that.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Asking me a question then saying the answer isn't true, is pretty much calling me a liar, PL.

Have a great night, dude.

 

[Pastor Larry]

Asking me a question then saying the answer isn't true, is pretty much calling me a liar, PL.

Where did I do that? What in the world are you talking about?

I don't recall saying your answer wasn't true. You didn't even really give an answer as to how it was relevant.

If you are going to be upset, be upset because I said the story was nonsense ... as in, it wasn't a true news story. But I never called you a liar in anyway. We disagreed on the news value of a story. Again, simply go back and read the thread. You will see that I never called you a liar.

As a matter of fact, you don't have to go look it up. I will cut and paste it right here:

Who cares? How is this a news story of any relevance?

Then

How is this news or relevant? There were likely thousands of people arrested on drug violations in the last few days, none of whom are mentioned here. What makes this newsworthy? That someone can use "Palin," "drugs," and "arrest" in the same sentence?

Let's demand more from this board than to post this kind of nonsense.

As you can see, there is no insinuation that you lied, and you can see that I didn't say your answer wasn't true. We disagreed on the newsworthiness of an issue and you responded by calling me self-righteous.

So I think you are very misguided here.