So homosexuality is worse than murder... worse than blaspheming the holy spirit... worse than not accepting Jesus as your savior?
The WAGES OF SIN IS DEATH! It doesn' say homosexuality is worse than other sins.... all sin is paid by death. Now the earthly punishment for different sin may be in different degrees, but can we all agree that any sin can be forgiven by God except for not believing in Jesus?
Sin is Sin. The wage of ANY sin is the same wage of any other sin - death. Period.
If you believe the Bible, then you know that death entered this world because Eve ate a piece of fruit she was told not to.... so, Jim, is homosexuality really worse than eating too many cheeseburgers? Our eternal life on earth with no pain or suffering was lost when Eve ate an apple (fruit). What is worse than death and eternity in hell? Is homosexuality going to give a person death and hell more so than any other sin? I think not.
So then... why is homosexuality worse than lying or adultry? Because of our culture and society and the expectations and ramifications of them. So spiritually it's no worse than any other sin... the same remedy is available as is available to any other sinner (salvation). But physically in our society it is worse. Therefore, our society has rules that govern the severity of the punishment as it corrresponds to the severity of the crime (God does not).
Would I be upset if a speeder wer made ambassador - probably not.
Yet more people are killed every year in America by car accidents involving speeding drivers than are killed by AIDS, or are killed by abducters, or are killed by drugs or alchohol.
Now we are indeed to resist evil in the earth. But appointing a homosexual to be an ambassador isn't exactly an endorsement to homosexual marriage. It's appointing a sinner to public office. Guess what... that happens every day. It doesn't mean that Bush supports homosexuality... it means that Bush thinks this person is a good embassador.
And if we want to get back to the original topic - President Bush is not in favour of a total ban on the slaughter of the unborn. If the mother's life is in danger it is okay to murder the child.
That is rediculous - Bush is the one trying to push through the BAN on partial birth abortion. There is NEVER a time in partial birth abortion where the mother's life is in danger. Every doctor will tell you that if the mother is healthy enought to go through a partial birth abortion, she is healthy enough to go through a full birth. Bush has even stated this, so I am not sure what you are talking about.
Furthermore, it is clear that Bush does not support abortion of any kind... preferring instead a culture of life.
I totally oppose any pre-natal murder
As does Bush - but he doesn't get to make that decision. It's been forced upon us by liberal activist judges. So... what CAN Bush do? He can try to appoint judges that will strictly interpret the constitution instead of legislating from the Bench. Ooops! What happened when he tried to do that? The liberals and democrats filibustered his selections!! Remember Miguel Estrada? He would certainly have made an impact for life in the court system. Why did the Democrats filibuster him? Because of his Pro-Life, anti-abortion beliefs.
During Bush's next term, there will be anywhere from 2 to 4 Supreme Court Justices who are replaced. Just think how horrible it would be for those who oppose homosexual marriage and abortion any John Kerry nominations would have been in the supreme court. Now, Bush will be free to nominate men like Miguel Estrada to the supreme court and we could actually see some real change for the better happen. CLEARLY Bush's re-election is cause for celebration and rejoicing!