Bye, Bye Norm

[Andy T.]

I never intended to discuss the details of inerrancy. You were the one that tried to go down that trail. Revert back to my posts #35 and #39 for the point I was making about our Scriptural/religious views influencing our politics.

 

[Magnetic Poles]

I never intended to discuss the details of inerrancy. You were the one that tried to go down that trail. Revert back to my posts #35 and #39 for the point I was making about our Scriptural/religious views influencing our politics.

Whatevah! :sleep:

 

[Andy T.]

Whatevah! :sleep:

MP, seriously, go back to post #35, delete the word "inerrant" (since that was a huge stumbling block for you) and address the point of my post.

 

[rbell]

You're wasting your time.

Actually, I think that MP, unlike some others, will take an honest look at the information given. I think that blasphemy by a public official will bother him, just as it does me.

There are others here that, unfortunately, it doesn't seem to bother much at all. :tear:

 

[carpro]

Inspired, yes. Inerrant? Not any version I own.

Once again, it's evident.

You seem to pick and choose what's important and what parts to obey and what to ignore.

Makes you the final arbiter of Christ's message.

<inappropriate comment deleted - LE>

never mind.

I think I already know the answer.

 

[rbell]

Found it...OK, here's some more source material for Franken's antics:

His filthy articles about $exuality & the like are in Playboy. I ain't a-linking that here.

In the 1995 New York magazine profile of "Saturday Night Live," Franken jokes about raping several of the cast of "60 minutes."

(http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/10991.html)

Respected journalist Katherine Kursten of the Minneapolis-St. Paul Tribune documented Franken's lewd and blasphemous comments.

It is, as I stated earlier. Here you go: STARTRIBUNE story.


MP, you said:

I have not seen first hand documentation of such. I can be swayed by primary evidence.

Now you have said evidence. What say you?

******

Dragonfly, you apparently support Franken, and aren't bothered at all for what he stands for. Now that you've been confronted with this...what say you?

...Does your conscience bother you when you find out that you support this kind of "statesman?"

...Or is it more important for you to "make a point," than to distance yourself from someone as perverted and blasphemous as Franken?

...Or will you simply ignore this, now that your position has been called out?

 

[Magnetic Poles]

Found it...OK, here's some more source material for Franken's antics:

His filthy articles about $exuality & the like are in Playboy. I ain't a-linking that here.

In the 1995 New York magazine profile of "Saturday Night Live," Franken jokes about raping several of the cast of "60 minutes."

(http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/10991.html)

Respected journalist Katherine Kursten of the Minneapolis-St. Paul Tribune documented Franken's lewd and blasphemous comments.

It is, as I stated earlier. Here you go: STARTRIBUNE story.


MP, you said:



Now you have said evidence. What say you?

******

Dragonfly, you apparently support Franken, and aren't bothered at all for what he stands for. Now that you've been confronted with this...what say you?

...Does your conscience bother you when you find out that you support this kind of "statesman?"

...Or is it more important for you to "make a point," than to distance yourself from someone as perverted and blasphemous as Franken?

...Or will you simply ignore this, now that your position has been called out?

rbell, thanks for finding the links. You sure Playboy isn't bookmarked in your browser? (Just kidding, bro). I will dig into them and give them full attention in a little while. :thumbs:

 

[rbell]

Yer welcome, MP. :thumbs:

 

[LadyEagle]

Closing this thread as it is on page 5, past the 3-page limit.

LE