• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

cain's wife...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Baptist4life

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The logical explanation is rather more simple, I think (and rules out the barriers to incest).

God created a "very good" creation, and by that we would assume that the genetic structure of what He created was complete, fully operational, and without flaw. In that sense, there is no mandate against incest, for the main reason against it is propagation of genetic flaws.

AS the curse of sin multiplied, this genetic flaw became rampant because of the destructive patterns of humans, including their diet, the removal of certain features that were common to the early creation after the flood, and likely other concerns that we might only speculate about.

God THEN declared that incest was the propagation between blood relatives and set down a law to halt the process.

Before that, there was no law, as has already been pointed out, and indeed, all humans were descended first from Adam and Eve, both of the "same flesh" in more ways than the marriage relationship, and also through the sons and wives of Noah, who propagated the entire population of the earth as seen in the Table of Nations found in Genesis.

Can I back up the genetic issue scripturally? Only indirectly... In at least one instance we find Nephilim who were attempting to propagate with the daughters of men, seemingly in order to create a new race of people, i.e., introduce a new genetic structure through propagation. Also, there were the mandates to propagate within certain people groups and not with those who were outside the tribe, so to speak. I think that both are indirect genetic issues stipulated by God, knowing, of course, that the concept of genetics and passing down DNA was an alien topic until the past century or so, and more particularly this current generation, where some of the issues found in genetic structure have been revealed from the general revelation that is this observable world.

:applause::applause::applause::thumbsup:
 

beameup

Member
Let's not forget that the bene ha Elohim became "human like" and interbred with the "daughters of Adam" thus corrupting the entire human genome...
with the exception of Noah, his wife, his sons and their wives. With this corruption complete it would have been impossible for God to provide a savior
for the "human" race. :)
see Genesis 6
 

glfredrick

New Member
Forbid incest, then allow it, then forbid it....that would be two changes of mind. So to answer your question: no. I mean maybe.

I see, so he was simply renaming the activity.

Yes, until God changed his mind and allowed it. Or renamed it.

When before the Law was given, did God forbid incest (or rather, propagation with close relatives, for it was not called incest until the Law)?

Did you recently discover a verse in the early chapters of Genesis that no one else has ever seen?

Share already!
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sorry, Sportzz fanzz, but you're requiring GOD to do a 180. It's VERY obvious that He is STRICTLY against incest between parent and child, and brother-sister. The fact that it's a worldwide taboo, & often leads to birth defects shows how much He is against it.

I am open to any explanation of where cain's wife came from that DOESN'T INVOLVE INCEST. Just saying it wasn't "incest" until God gave the Israelis His law is as saying Cain's killing Abel wasn't "murder" until GOD gave that law as well. Wrong is WRONG, no matter what it's called by mankind. And incest is wrong, no matter what name it's under, and I believe it's ALWAYS been wrong.
 

matt wade

Well-Known Member
Sorry, Sportzz fanzz, but you're requiring GOD to do a 180. It's VERY obvious that He is STRICTLY against incest between parent and child, and brother-sister. The fact that it's a worldwide taboo, & often leads to birth defects shows how much He is against it.

I am open to any explanation of where cain's wife came from that DOESN'T INVOLVE INCEST. Just saying it wasn't "incest" until God gave the Israelis His law is as saying Cain's killing Abel wasn't "murder" until GOD gave that law as well. Wrong is WRONG, no matter what it's called by mankind. And incest is wrong, no matter what name it's under, and I believe it's ALWAYS been wrong.

Then you can ALWAYS be wrong.
 

Amy.G

New Member
Sorry, Sportzz fanzz, but you're requiring GOD to do a 180. It's VERY obvious that He is STRICTLY against incest between parent and child, and brother-sister. The fact that it's a worldwide taboo, & often leads to birth defects shows how much He is against it.

I am open to any explanation of where cain's wife came from that DOESN'T INVOLVE INCEST. Just saying it wasn't "incest" until God gave the Israelis His law is as saying Cain's killing Abel wasn't "murder" until GOD gave that law as well. Wrong is WRONG, no matter what it's called by mankind. And incest is wrong, no matter what name it's under, and I believe it's ALWAYS been wrong.
And saying the God created more people after the fall of Adam is WRONG. I asked you some questions earlier but you didn't answer. I'll post them again.

Did another fall take place by other humans created after the fall of Adam?

Who is he? What about his descendants? Are they cursed by sin? Did they sin? Did Christ redeem this race of people who had different parents?
Did God created these "other" people good as He created Adam good and sinless?
 

Don

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sorry, Sportzz fanzz, but you're requiring GOD to do a 180. It's VERY obvious that He is STRICTLY against incest between parent and child, and brother-sister. The fact that it's a worldwide taboo, & often leads to birth defects shows how much He is against it.

I am open to any explanation of where cain's wife came from that DOESN'T INVOLVE INCEST. Just saying it wasn't "incest" until God gave the Israelis His law is as saying Cain's killing Abel wasn't "murder" until GOD gave that law as well. Wrong is WRONG, no matter what it's called by mankind. And incest is wrong, no matter what name it's under, and I believe it's ALWAYS been wrong.
You really know how to limit God, don't you?
 

glfredrick

New Member
What I find odd in this particular thread is the divergent folks, who normally argue like red-headed stepchildren about everything else, agreeing about the nature of Cain's wife (and all early wives).

Without "adding" to Scripture (and Scripture DOES say that Adam and Eve had other sons and daughters) we can only know that Cain took a wife from available persons, all of whom were direct relatives. Whether sisters, cousins, nieces, 3rd removed, etc., is unknown, but blood relatives is necessary to preserve the text as there is no mention of any other people, either in chapters 1-4 of Genesis or in chapter 5, the grand summary of the generations of Adam:

Gen 5:1-27 (ESV)
1 This is the book of the generations of Adam. When God created man, he made him in the likeness of God. 2 Male and female he created them, and he blessed them and named them Man when they were created. 3 When Adam had lived 130 years, he fathered a son in his own likeness, after his image, and named him Seth. 4 The days of Adam after he fathered Seth were 800 years; and he had other sons and daughters. 5 Thus all the days that Adam lived were 930 years, and he died.

6 When Seth had lived 105 years, he fathered Enosh. 7 Seth lived after he fathered Enosh 807 years and had other sons and daughters. 8 Thus all the days of Seth were 912 years, and he died.

9 When Enosh had lived 90 years, he fathered Kenan. 10 Enosh lived after he fathered Kenan 815 years and had other sons and daughters. 11 Thus all the days of Enosh were 905 years, and he died.

12 When Kenan had lived 70 years, he fathered Mahalalel. 13 Kenan lived after he fathered Mahalalel 840 years and had other sons and daughters. 14 Thus all the days of Kenan were 910 years, and he died.

15 When Mahalalel had lived 65 years, he fathered Jared. 16 Mahalalel lived after he fathered Jared 830 years and had other sons and daughters. 17 Thus all the days of Mahalalel were 895 years, and he died.

18 When Jared had lived 162 years he fathered Enoch. 19 Jared lived after he fathered Enoch 800 years and had other sons and daughters. 20 Thus all the days of Jared were 962 years, and he died.

21 When Enoch had lived 65 years, he fathered Methuselah. 22 Enoch walked with God after he fathered Methuselah 300 years and had other sons and daughters. 23 Thus all the days of Enoch were 365 years. 24 Enoch walked with God, and he was not, for God took him.

25 When Methuselah had lived 187 years, he fathered Lamech. 26 Methuselah lived after he fathered Lamech 782 years and had other sons and daughters. 27 Thus all the days of Methuselah were 969 years, and he died.
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You clearly do not understand the creation or the fall of man to suggest that there was people created after the fall to be intigrated into the fallen race. There was incest after the fall. That is a simply fact regardless whether or not you like it.

I don't think so. That's saying GOD did a 180, condoning something He now abhors. maybe man does that, but GOD does NOT change His mind that radically. Now, where He once condoned marriage with half-siblings, and other close, but not biologically direct, relatives, it's illogical that He EVER condoned incest between full bio siblings or between parent and child. Now, while He didn't swiftly punish Lot's daughters for their incest with their dad, we see by the history of their descendants, the nations of Moab and Ammon, that He cersainly didn't like it.

It's VERY obvious GOD HATES INCEST, by the fact that peoples who've never hearda GOD don't practice it; not even your dogs & cats do.
 

Don

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I've mentioned before that there are gaping holes in your logic; here's a prime example.

Does God hate murder? Of course He does; one of the 10 commandments specifically says, "Thou shalt not kill."

Yet, Numbers 31 tells us: And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Avenge the children of Israel of the Midianites." To that end, Moses instructed the people to kill all the male children, and all the women that had laid with a man.

Your contention, your proposition, is that God "changed" if He allowed incest, and then disallowed it. However, your contention is not borne out by scripture, because the same principle would apply to God allowing Moses to murder the Midianite women and male children, while also giving Moses the commandment "thou shalt not kill."

The only answer that satisfies this seeming contradiction is: God fulfilled His purpose for the Isrealites.

And that answer also applies to your incest argument.

Whether *you* like it or not.
 

John3v36

New Member
This hard to tell we have the creation week then the next date is when Seth was born when Adam was 130. So the time line goes from day six to year 130. Cain took a wife in that time

Ge 5:3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:type:


How much time lapsed between Cain and his wife? I'm quite sure it could have been a couple of generations.
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
God's command to Moses concerning the Midianites was for PUNISHMENT, not murder. The Midianites, thru the council of Balaam, had led Israel to sin. It was balaam who suggested that Midianite women seduce Israeli men, and lead them to sin by fornication and idol worship, thus bringing GOD'S anger upon Israel. God's very command was to TAKE REVENGE upon Midian.

Nothing to do with murder, or condoning incest.

Fact is, Sportzz Fanzz, that Scripture is silent about where Cain's wife came from, and where Noah's grandchildren obtained spouses. But it's NOT silent about the fact that incest is an abomination to GOD. Therefore, the possibility that GOD created other people is more-likely than it is that Cain married his own sister....not impossible, but unlikely.
 

freeatlast

New Member
God's command to Moses concerning the Midianites was for PUNISHMENT, not murder. The Midianites, thru the council of Balaam, had led Israel to sin. It was balaam who suggested that Midianite women seduce Israeli men, and lead them to sin by fornication and idol worship, thus bringing GOD'S anger upon Israel. God's very command was to TAKE REVENGE upon Midian.

Nothing to do with murder, or condoning incest.

Fact is, Sportzz Fanzz, that Scripture is silent about where Cain's wife came from, and where Noah's grandchildren obtained spouses. But it's NOT silent about the fact that incest is an abomination to GOD. Therefore, the possibility that GOD created other people is more-likely than it is that Cain married his own sister....not impossible, but unlikely.

Like I said before. You do not have any understanding at all of the creation, the fall and the redemption of man. If you did you would know it is impossible for there to be another creation that is not mentioned. Your over zealous attempt to deal with a particular issue has caused you to add to scripture and destroy the truth of what is given. While incest is sin according to scripture God did not deal with it until Moses. It is no different then homosexuality. God did not deal with it until Moses, and you can bet that there was homosexuals before Moses. The same with incest. In the case of cane he could have married some one who would not be considered a close relative if he married someone who was his nieces child, but most likely he married either a sister or niece. In at least the first two generations after Adam and Eve everyone practiced what is being called incest. You need to stop adding to scripture to support your false view.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

glfredrick

New Member
Indeed, Adam and Eve were incestuous, as Eve was created from a part of Adam's body! In their case, it was as if identical twins, male and female, begat the entire human race.

And, that was not only not a sin, God COMMANDED that they procreate, "be fruitful, multiply, and fill the earth." In His first act with human beings, He instituted with Adam and his cloned-twin wife, Eve, a one-flesh relationship called marriage. Those are the facts from Scripture.

You have already been told about the issue with Abraham and Sarah, she was a half sister.

When we read of the marriage partner of Issac and Jacob, we find, again, that they are sent "home" to find a suitable bride from blood relatives. This was God's doing, and God was through and through the episodes.

The only other (potential) race of beings mentioned in the Scriptures are the Sons of God mentioned in Genesis 6, but even that is open to dispute, with some solid scholars seeing them as alien (in the sense of not homo Sapiens) in some sort and another group seeing them as very human, but self-declared kings that believed they were deity. The potential exists for them to be the descendent's of Cain who set up his own (protected) kingdom apart from the balance of Adam's descendent's.

Those were the only people on the planet if one holds to the Scriptures as accurate, which leaves only one conclusion -- marriage between blood relatives was not seen as incestuous in that early period.
 

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I TOTALLY reject the "incest" explanation, based upon GOD'S hatred of it, and the fact that there are five distinct races of people today

Please explain.

I hope you are not suggesting that the existence of "races" stems from these purported non-Adamic humans.
 

freeatlast

New Member
I don't think so. That's saying GOD did a 180, condoning something He now abhors. maybe man does that, but GOD does NOT change His mind that radically. Now, where He once condoned marriage with half-siblings, and other close, but not biologically direct, relatives, it's illogical that He EVER condoned incest between full bio siblings or between parent and child. Now, while He didn't swiftly punish Lot's daughters for their incest with their dad, we see by the history of their descendants, the nations of Moab and Ammon, that He cersainly didn't like it.

It's VERY obvious GOD HATES INCEST, by the fact that peoples who've never hearda GOD don't practice it; not even your dogs & cats do.


I am not sure what planet you are from but do you really believe that people who have never heard of God do not practice incest? And animals? COME ON! :tonofbricks:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Don

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
God's command to Moses concerning the Midianites was for PUNISHMENT, not murder.
So killing unarmed women and children is "punishment," not murder.

The Midianites, thru the council of Balaam, had led Israel to sin. It was balaam who suggested that Midianite women seduce Israeli men, and lead them to sin by fornication and idol worship, thus bringing GOD'S anger upon Israel. God's very command was to TAKE REVENGE upon Midian.

Nothing to do with murder, or condoning incest.
So you support the wholesale slaughter of women and children, but you can't bring yourself to entertain an idea that you disagree with?

Fact is, Sportzz Fan, that's called "a double standard."
 

freeatlast

New Member
Originally Posted by robycop3
I TOTALLY reject the "incest" explanation, based upon GOD'S hatred of it, and the fact that there are five distinct races of people today
.

Like I said you do not have a clue as to any understanding of the creation, the fall, and why there is redemption.

The races came from Adam and Eve. Our prejudices have kept many from understanding how this can be because usually a white person see the pair as white, a black person sees them as black, a Chinese person as Chinese and so on.
In the creation was the prospect of ever man ever to come after them. The pair held every possible genetic code possible. It is highly likely that one of the first pair was light skinned, one was darker, one had round eyes and one a more slanted and so on.
As man went out into the world after the fall it is reasonable to hold that as children were born they would take on different genetic appearances. At first they would have been very subtle and as time went more pronounced as two people who looked alike would come together. By the time of the tower of babble the basic look of each race would be fairly set.
Then when God confused the languages all he had to do to get the different nations was to set each language to the race that was already present. Then as this new group went out because they would not intermingle with others outside their race their own race became even more pronounced until we see what we have today except it is reverting back to a more common looks in a race because of intermarriage.

There was no other people created after Adam and Eve. Your slant on the sin of incest is clouding your understanding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top