Hey AIC, did you not know that if a Calvinist fails to persuade you that Calvinism is not false doctrine, you are unteachable, rather than the Calvinist is presenting falsehood.
I have been called lots of names, including ignorant and unteachable, and I see they are continuing to present fallacies, such as ad hominems, to defend their mistaken views. Go figure.
The question is why would any serious student of God's word not be able to discern the lack of context, the errors in grammar, and the outright redefinition of words that is the sum and substance of Calvinism.
The T, total spiritual inability is clearly false based on Matthew 13 and the four soils, where one soil fits the "T" due to hardening, but the other three still seek God.
The U, unconditional election is clearly false based on 2 Thessalonians 2:13 where we are chosen for salvation based on faith in the truth. Clearly a condition. Then there is James 2:5 where the poor are chosen who are rich in faith and love God, clearly conditional. Then we have 1 Corinthians 1:26-30 where folks are chosen out of the world to shame others, clearly conditional. No student of the bible could nullify all this.
The L, limited atonement, as defined by Calvinism, is clearly false doctrine. Jesus died for all mankind, He laid down His life as a ransom for all, He became the propitiation for the whole world. No serious student would accept this false doctrine.
The I, Irresistible Grace is shown to be false by Matthew 23:13 where men are entering heaven, thus having received all the revelatory grace needed, yet are turned aside by false doctrine.
Calvinism is defended by tactics such as name calling, misrepresentation, and spamming a thread with non-germane posts. That's it folks.
