I can't speak for sturgman, but I for one agree with the truth in the whole Bible, and that means I also agree with the truth in Romans 1. Indeed, this particular part of Romans 1 describes total depravity quite well:
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness
By the way, what I find amazing is that Arminians insert the word "men" in "I will draw all men", and then conclude that it must mean Jesus will draw
every man to himself. Yet the word "men" is absent in the Greek. In contrast, the word "men" exists in the Greek in Romans 1:18. Yet somehow this must mean "some but not all men" because to look at it otherwise would demonstrate total depravity, which the Arminian cannot tolerate.
Arminians will be quick to point out that the word "all" does not exist in the Greek in Romans 1:18. But then one only needs to proceed to Romans 2 to fill in that gap.
Romans 2:1 Therefore you are inexcusable, O man, whoever you are who judge, for in whatever you judge another you condemn yourself; for you who judge practice the same things.
Whoops! Paul does not exempt anyone here, does he? It does NOT say, "Therefore you are inexcusable when you judge, those of you who also happen to practice the same things." It says "Therefore you are inexcusable
for you who judge DO practice the same things." That means everyone.
And that, Mr. Bill, illustrates one of the problems with asking someone if they agree with the truth in Romans 1. The answer is yes, but don't forget that Romans 1 is followed by Romans 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, etc.