I’m not a Calvinist….just don’t like youDo all Calvinists take courses in how to be nasty or is it that only those with that natural disposition would become Calvinists?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I’m not a Calvinist….just don’t like youDo all Calvinists take courses in how to be nasty or is it that only those with that natural disposition would become Calvinists?
Austin, it is simply that their a priori presupposition does not include a sovereign God. In that, I can only come to one conclusion -- they are yet in rebellion against holy God. We see a similar a priori presupposition in the case of atheistic naturalists concerning creation -- it just cannot be, for there is no First Cause that supernaturally spoke the cosmos into being by fiat, ex nihilo. Here, their presupposition is that God ALWAYS gives humans the final word in their own fate -- and in a sense He does, for left to our own devices, we will ALWAYS choose to spend eternity in hell! It is into that presupposition that God breaks, giving us (John 3:16-20) LIFE and more so, graciously and mercifully, ABUNDANT life!You have no understanding of the gospel of grace.
Yes, the best "we" can "do" is live by faith in perseverance. We hope in Christ and rest in His atonement, by faith. That truly is the best we can do and it is amazing!
FYI…I do know I have been saved…what’s more, I’m not rebellious against my Sovereign Lord!You have no understanding of the gospel of grace.
Yes, the best "we" can "do" is live by faith in perseverance. We hope in Christ and rest in His atonement, by faith. That truly is the best we can do and it is amazing!
LOL…neither am I! These guys liberally throw that name around as if it’s a pejorative.ROFL, never said it was, and why should you care? You're no Calvinist.
I’m not a Calvinist….just don’t like you
That’s funny, see I do know you via your posts and commentary. By contrast I could indicate who on here you should learn from however you wouldn’t do that either soooNow why would you not like me? You do not even know me in the least bit. Now if you had said you did not like me pointing out your errors that would be different. But the truth does have a way of offending people.
You still don't get that only the elect, the regenerate, are responsible. Only the elect, the regenerate, have the free will choice to serve God, or not. To all others 'the things of God' are foolishness.
But for the most part, even the 'Calvinists' don't get that.
That’s funny, see I do know you via your posts and commentary. By contrast I could indicate who on here you should learn from however you wouldn’t do that either sooo![]()
You either know something or you don’t and apparently you don’t know certainty. Is that how you live your life? Don’t answer that, I already know.Oh there are some on BB that I think do have it together but I doubt that it would be anyone that you would recommend.
Because there are passages that seem to indicate you actually choosing to follow, and keep following God, and other scriptures that seem to indicate you are saved and kept totally BY God. So people try to understand and explain this. It's not wrong to look at another scripture and try to see why it seems to say something different than the first scripture you looked at. Either our scriptural record is flawed in such a case, or we may be failing to understand the truths and how they relate to each other. Thus you have theology.
For a strict or high-Calvinist it would mean that all those He died for were ungodly. Exactly what the words say. You are just as guilty of adding to the meaning as a Calvinist if you try to turn that statement into an argument for universal atonement. It's fine if you want to, and you may be right, but you are doing theology. You are fitting a meaning of a verse into your vision of the overall system you believe in. We all do it.
If only the "elect, regenerate" have the ability to freely choose then that means that all the others did not have the free ability so the fact they are in hell is not their doing but rather Gods.
You either know something or you don’t and apparently you don’t know certainty. Is that how you live your life? Don’t answer that, I already know.
"Ever and anon the non-Cal cries, Why doth He still find fault?" - Aaron
18 So then he hath mercy on whom he will, and whom he will be hardeneth.
19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he still find fault? For who withstandeth his will?
20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why didst thou make me thus? Ro 9
And ever and anon this verse is used to shore up a false understanding of your errant view.
Lol, it has your entire complaint pegged, O man.
Sorry that does not work. Romans 5 is not in the context of Calvinists being ungodly, it is in the context of the whole world being ungodly. The whole world has been identified as those born into the family of Adam. They are all ungodly and they are the ones who die because of it. The point is that the remedy for death is in Jesus Christ and is as broad as the need. It is dishonest and a manipulation of the text to claim that only the Calvinists are in view in these chapters. Jesus Christ is in no way less than Adam. "In Adam all die, in Christ all shall be made alive, the scriptures says."
That is a false teaching.I remind everyone that God was obliged to save the Jews because he promised them he would. However he was not obligated by a promise to save anyone else God would still be just if he had only saved the Jews and not saved the gentiles.
So what do you do with verse 5? It seems that the washing of regeneration and the renewing of the Holy Spirit are things we are passive in. How do you wash yourself and renew yourself. And if you say believe just remember that the Calvinist theologians say the exact same thing. Now a Calvinist will without apology, put the renewing of the Holy Spirit and at least the beginning of regeneration first, before you believe and they do not apologize for that. But is that really a reason to hate the doctrine of all the great preachers from the 1550's to now? Do you not at least agree that regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit are of the Holy Spirit and not you? So the only real dispute is the order.Here is another passage I like. It is about God the Father and lets us know we must believe in God the Father because it is his grace towards us that Jesus Christ was sent. He is called our Saviour in this passage.