I'm not ready to assign him there. I know he's firmly established in a position I disagree with, but a valid point still stands.
I've said before - if God is a sadist, so what? Or if God is subservient to man, so what?
The issue should never be how it makes us feel, or whether we like the notion. The issue of utmost importance is what do the scriptures say?
He made the world and everything in it, not us. And His word is truth, not ours. If His word clashes with our thinking, then our thinking needs to change
I don't know if I agree with you. I have read many a Calvinist say they were revolted at the doctrine of Calvinism when they first heard it, if offended their idea of a loving God. But teachers can manipulate scripture to make it appear God is the author of sin.
For example, Hyper-Calvinists will often quote Isa 45:7
Isa 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.
You could take this scripture and use it to teach that God is the author of evil, in fact, I have seen it done. I have seen Hypers say that the devil is simply God's servant, carrying out those evil things God ordains.
Almost anyone would be offended by teaching like this, but a clever teacher could say, "Look, what does the scripture say? Does it say God creates evil?"
You can manipulate scripture, but if something doesn't sound or feel right, you better investigate a little more before you fall for it hook, line, and sinker.
God wrote the law on our heart and gave us a conscience for a reason.