A distinction without a difference.
Only to fit your mindset. Piper said nothing toward Chesterton that was evil in intention. Your conclusions are merely reflecting your bias against truth.
Thus the distinction is a VAST difference and you are being disingenuous.
Here's the facts; You accuse Piper of saying this toward a man and 'non-calvinists'. This is an untrue and baseless accusation, none of this took place at all. It's pure fabrication, fantasticalism and emotionalism on your part and there is nothing to back it up.
Pipers comments were about the book and what it said.
Now answer the question, was his comment about the Book or about 'non-calvinists' as you accuse so I can judge how honest a man you really are.
Note he called it a
CALVINIST-abominating book...he never even came CLOSE to saying non-cals are abominating which is your erroneous and baseless conclusion. Simmer down.