Another solid post that is understood by any who study the book
:applause: Good one! :laugh: Gotta love you guys :love2: :1_grouphug:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Another solid post that is understood by any who study the book
Calvinism insist that when the Holy Spirit engages the unregenerate He cannot be resisted (I in TULIP). I'll go with the scripture on this one.
"John" was addressing evangelist6589. I believe I seen another poster calling him John.
But, you could just take it as you read it also, that would be good! ;-)
Because Calvinism is a falsehood.
Calvinism does not teach this...but I guess you offer this idea as if you can defeat it:laugh:
Paragraph 4. Others not elected, although they may be called by the ministry of the Word, and may have some common operations of the Spirit,12 yet not being effectually drawn by the Father, they neither will nor can truly come to Christ, and therefore cannot be saved:13 much less can men that do not receive the Christian religion be saved; be they never so diligent to frame their lives according to the light of nature and the law of that religion they do profess.14
12 Matt. 22:14, 13:20,21; Heb 6:4,5
13 John 6:44,45,65; 1 John 2:24,25
14 Acts 4:12; John 4:22, 17:3
:applause: Good one! :laugh: Gotta love you guys :love2: :1_grouphug:
I have no idea what your question is.
Ah....
To do so, without considering the internal and historical context, would be to miss the point of the book. And, it is to seek an escape from the Author's main point in order to prefer your own interpretation, divorced from all things that convey its intended meaning. In short, it's groping in the darkness.
The Archangel
I'm still wondering where are all the Calvinists to comfort John in his dilemma.
I would think that they should be beating down the door for the opportunity to highlight how their philosophy gives an answer.
hello?hello?hello?hello?
Did you read the post? The question is obvious.
I'll be serious now, just in case you really didn't understand what John was asking....
Now, I'm going to refrain from anything inflammatory, and ask from John's Calvinist perspective.....
considering that repentance and faith are the result of God's effectual calling and regenerating grace,
why does it appear that God's grace toward Nineva came AFTER they repented?
Systematic theology does not always follow the narrative, but it is assumed in it.
Jonah 3:5 Then the people of Nineveh believed in God; and they called a fast and put on sackcloth from the greatest to the least of them.
Jonah 3:10 When God saw their deeds, that they turned from their wicked way, then God relented concerning the calamity which He had declared He would bring upon them. And He did not do it.
You can scoff, or you can learn. I guess you've chosen the first option. Too bad!
The Archangel
Ok, if you say so brother :love2: Spirit is teaching me something different. Guess will see who was listening the best at the judgment seat of Christ.
So.... He's giving you direct revelation then? He's giving you "revelation" which ignores the text? That's highly suspect.
The Archangel
evangelist6589 said:Anyways this is one book that has me confused as if God only granted faith and repentance to the elect why did God have compassion on Nineveh, on the 120,000 children and everyone else?
James, I appreciate your refraining from being inflammatory. I labor hard at honest discussion, even if the other person doesn't reciprocate.
No. I honestly don't understand the OP's question. I think I know what he's driving at, but the OP was so poorly written I don't want to be left assuming its intent. But as to your question...
A former professor of mine once said:
What he meant was that narratives do not always support a specific theological understanding (or doctrine). That understanding is assumed based on one's systematic theology. What's interesting is that this professor is viscerally anti-Calvinist!
The point?
The author of Jonah didn't have Monergism or Synergism in mind when he wrote his account. Depending on one's presupposition they may see Jonah as supporting their view of election, but since election and regeneration is really not the main focus of the book, they are guilt of a logical fallacy - a fatal flaw in their presupposition. This is not unique just to one side. Both Arminians and Calvinists are often guilty of this fallacy.
Here is what I do see in Jonah. Chapter 3 shows me the wonderful Old Testament picture of the Gospel at work. God commands Jonah to to preach the judgment of God upon the city of Nineveh. That is what we do when we proclaim Romans 3:23; 5:8; and 6:23a. The people of Nineveh believed in God. Hallelujah! Does Jonah 3 say that they first repented and then believed? No. It says:
Later in the chapter we read:
I think this is what your question is driving at, and here is where my theological presupposition comes into play.
1. Jonah is a narrative. It is not didactic. The point of the book is not water proof, air tight, buttoned down doctrine like the Book of Romans.
2. Can we draw conclusions from God's omniscience from Jonah 3:10? I say, no. If God truly changed His mind, and relented concerning the calamity He said He would bring against the people of Nineveh, then we are guilty of advocating the heresy of Open Theism.
3. The big picture of Jonah is not whether God truly changed His mind, but a two-fold purpose. A) Israel was guilty of not being a light of revelation to the Gentiles (Isa. 9:2; Luke 2:32). B) The grace and mercy of God extends to all who will call upon Him by faith.
So, you have my response.
I believe John (evangelist6589) is a little confused that an entire city repented. As he understands Calvinism, only the regenerated elect have the ability to repent. He seems to find it highly unlikely that every single person in this large city that had over 120,000 small children that could not discern between their right hand and left hand would repent.
That's a whole lotta repentin' goin' on in the words of Jerry Lee Lewis! :laugh:
Here's the question folks;
I don't know John, these folks can't even follow a question, you sure you want to rely on them for answers?
So.... He's giving you direct revelation then? He's giving you "revelation" which ignores the text? That's highly suspect.
The Archangel
If God wants me to believe as you do, wouldn't He make it happen?
I have been in this Calvinism debate for some time now and it has only strengthened my stance against TULIP.
I don't know what else to tell you, God has me against it as of now. Do you have any suggestions as to why?