• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Can a Bible translation be a work of the Devil??

Status
Not open for further replies.

Amy.G

New Member
Was it really in his chariot? I'd guess it would be hard to read anything in a bouncing chariot. I'd say he stopped and got out. ;)

Acts 8:31 And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.
 

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The ESV is essentially the Revised Standard Version tweaked a bit for evangelicals.

Many preachers denounced the RSV as a work of the Devil when the National Council of Churches introduced it in the mid twentieth cenury.
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The ESV is essentially the Revised Standard Version tweaked a bit for evangelicals.

Many preachers denounced the RSV as a work of the Devil when the National Council of Churches introduced it in the mid twentieth cenury.

Some Fundamentalists preachers burned the RSV in public. They apparently thought they were doing something godly. At least they didn't attempt to burn the translators!
 

Askjo

New Member
No - nor is he saved in verse 37 in the KJV. He was saved when he believed. When he stated it, that was after the belief occurred. Without verse 37, we see in verse 38 that the eunuch was baptized so it's obvious he was saved.
Are you saying that his testimony did not show him by his own statement (v 37)? Are you saying that he got saved by baptizing without v 37?

See verse 36 -- The Ethiopian eunuch asked Philip the question THEN ESV omitted verse 37 -- WHERE IS Philip's ANSWER to his question???
 

Mexdeaf

New Member
Did I say that they are from Alexandria?

You like beatings, don't you? :laugh:

Your exact words were-

ESV translators omitted it not because of manuscript evidence/history, but because of Alexandrian Gnostic's interest.

So you implied that the ESV translators were Alexandrian Gnostics.

And you still have no proof as the old thread shows.
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Are you saying that his testimony did not show him by his own statement (v 37)? Are you saying that he got saved by baptizing without v 37?

See verse 36 -- The Ethiopian eunuch asked Philip the question THEN ESV omitted verse 37 -- WHERE IS Philip's ANSWER to his question???

Am I saved when someone asks me if I believe or is it at the time when I believe?
 

Askjo

New Member
So you implied that the ESV translators were Alexandrian Gnostics.
Wrong again! I did not say that they were Alexandrian Gnostics. I said, "Alexandrian Gnostics' interest." They FOLLOWED Alexandrian Gnostic's interest!
 

rbell

Active Member
Nowhere in verses 26 -39 said, "by grace through faith." Where did you get that phrase on vv 26 - 39?

So, I take it that unless you are using the KJV, you can't use Scripture to back up Scripture.

Nice double standard. I'm sure it serves you well as you tilt at windmills.
 

Jerome

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Anyone know which translation merited these irenic words in a competing translation's preface?

Satan has found as many translators as there are frivolous and impudent minds; and he will probably find even more, unless God give them pause before it is too late. If the reader asks me for an example, let me refer to [translator's name]'s translation of the Bible. . . . We therefore regard it as a conscientious duty to break the silence we have hitherto kept, and to warn all Christians against this man, the chosen of Satan.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top