The condition has to be true and possible if it is to be met.That has nothing to do with the young rich ruler and the lawyer asking Jesus a direct question, "What must I do to inherit eternal life"
Jesus directly answered them both and told them that if they would enter into life, keep the commandments. That is a perfectly true statement, if a man were to perfectly keep the commandments all his life he would not be lost. The fact that all men sin and come short of the glory of God does not alter the truth of Jesus's answer. I am sorry you cannot understand that, Albert Barnes understood it. John Gill understood it too.
Now, I don't know if I agree with Gills "covenant of works", but Gill knew that Jesus's statement to this lawyer was perfectly true, and that if any man were to perfectly keep all the commandments he would not be lost but inherit eternal life.
Again, I am sorry you cannot understand what these scholars easily understood.
Gill understood that too.
Gill understood that it was impossible to meet the condition and therefore impossible to gain eternal life through works.
This is something you won't admit.
It is also something Jesus said was impossible.
I have asked you this before, but I don't seem to get an answer (just like with 1Cor.13:1-3). BTW, the example of the passage in 1Cor.13 has to do with grammatical construction.
But please explain what Jesus meant here:
Luke 17:10 So likewise ye, when ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you, say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do.