Hmm, they believed Jesus is the Christ (Meshiach) come in the flesh, and you don't (according to your own words).I would not adhere to anything that came out of the Council of Nicaea
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Hmm, they believed Jesus is the Christ (Meshiach) come in the flesh, and you don't (according to your own words).I would not adhere to anything that came out of the Council of Nicaea
No, it is the truth.
Because He lives within me in the Person of the Holy Spirit and His Spirit bears witness to my spirit that I am a child of God. Father/child is a personal relationship. He is my Savior. That's pretty personal.
It has nothing to do with feelings, at all. It has to do with His promises and the fact that He is faithful to what He says. My faith is not rooted in emotion for feeling but on the solid rock of Scripture and the finished work of the Cross wherein Jesus paid for my salvation and offers me eternal life simply by placing faith in Him.
No, It is not based on how I feel about it.
I am totally different than them. They appealed to their works, their own merit, their own effort. They didn't appeal to knowing Jesus or personal relationship with Him. And Jesus simply told them that He never knew them and sent them into eternal destruction.
I know I have a relationship with Jesus for three reasons. First of all, Jesus died for me. The eternal work of Jesus on the cross paid for my sins and by that, I have eternal life, right now. Eternal life isn't a thing; it's a person. Jesus is eternal life. He is the both the giver and the gift of eternal life.
Secondly, I have internal witness of the Holy Spirit who lives within me. The Holy Spirit lives within me keeping me saved and reminding that I belong to the Lord: (Rom. 8: 15-17 I John 4:13)
Third, I have the record of Scripture which says: "And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life. These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God." (1Jn 5:11-13)
So the Bible tells me that I can know, right now, that I am saved and it tells me in Eph. 1: 13 that I am sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise. He not only saves me but keeps me saved.
So it is not based on feeling, but on the work of Jesus on the cross, the internal abiding presence of the Holy Spirit and the unchanging, infallible written record of Scripture. I don't have rely feelings at all, thank the Lord. Feelings are unreliable and fickle.
It is a warning to those who are relying their good works and what will happen to them in eternity if that is all they have to appeal to. Good works will not get anyone into Heaven.
Yes, we are to keep HIS commandments. But that is not the Mosaic commandments, he is referring to. He is referring to the commandments he delivered during His earthly ministry and the New Testament clarifies that fact.
Sounds like you have decided to assign false values to my previous statements because you couldn't actually respond to what I said. You assigned my words to "feelings" when feelings have nothing to do with anything I said.
Lol, talking to yourself now?...
Oh, you are one of those, that twist anything to your favor.Hmm, they believed Jesus is the Christ (Meshiach) come in the flesh, and you don't (according to your own words).
Hmm, first you tell us the Law that Jesus referred to was without context, now you blend elements of the law with NT scripture concerning the levitical priesthood and in another post also confounding circumcision of the flesh and spiritual circumcision.
You sir are confused.
By your reasoning, if we don't need the levitical priesthood because Jesus replaced it then we don't need the earthly sabbath because Jesus replaced it with His rest.
Matthew 11
27 All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.
28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
30 For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.
Hebrews 4:9 There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God;
Hmm, first you tell us the Law that Jesus referred to was without context, now you blend elements of the law with NT scripture concerning the levitical priesthood and in another post also confounding circumcision of the flesh and spiritual circumcision.
You sir are confused.
By your reasoning, if we don't need the levitical priesthood because Jesus replaced it then we don't need the earthly sabbath because Jesus replaced it with His rest.
Matthew 11
27 All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him.
28 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
29 Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
30 For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.
Hebrews 4:9 There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God;
Are you talking to me or kyredneck, since you quoted both of us?What has it been 5 hours and you respond to something that was not addressed to you. If that is funny you are easily amused. Why don't you answer my question? Who is the liar?
If you want to keep the feasts and the Law of Moses, that is your business. You do what you want to do. But if you are tying those things to salvation, if you believe that you are inheriting eternal life because you are keeping the commandments and feasts, you are going to be disappointed when you stand before the Lord because you will stand before Him under the law and not under grace. If you are trusting in your Torah observance, you will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven.
I thought it was kyredneckAre you talking to me or kyredneck, since you quoted both of us?
Oh, you are one of those, that twist anything to your favor.
Yes I often play the Grand Inquisitor (I would say devil's advocate but someone else freaked out when I called myself that because I identified with the devil)You are not confused but deceptive to the point of being funny.
yes in fact you did by innuendo.How did I mix anything circumcision?
Ah, I caught you in your own machinations. you FIRST used the word "replace" in post number 33 (and I quote)What do you mean "Jesus" replaced the Sabbath with his rest. "I will give you rest" means it is replaced. You are just putting words up so that anyone following will think you know what you are talking about.
John 6:29 KJVS
[29] Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.
No, I am not. I know the difference between being forgiven and having eternal life.You are conflating two concepts together. Forgiveness/redemption is not eternal life/heaven.
Can you cite a single statement from a mainstream theologian/Christian Bible teacher that confuses those two concepts?A critical disconnect with Christian theology is that it confuses "eternal life" with the "forgiveness of sins".
When we receive the “forgiveness of sins” by confessing belief in the Blood Atonement of Ahashua HaMashiach, we are returned to the state of Adam before he sinned. We are “made righteous” once again in Eloah’s eyes, that is, our spirit is renewed/restored and we receive the Ruach HaKodosh.
The moment you place your faith in Jesus, you are saved. Eternal life begins the very moment you are saved.However, this confession does not automatically guarantee “eternal life”.
Once your spirit has been restored, you are now a new creature (2 Cor 5:17), and your mission is to walk after the Spirit and not after the flesh (Rom 8:1). This is the path to “eternal life”, by overcoming the flesh and following the Spirit. It is not “a gift”; you must strive to attain it.
You are quoting that passage out of the context of the story. Jesus was not presenting the man with a theology. He was testing the man and exposing his real problem, namely that he loved his riches more than he loved God. Jesus knew what is response would be, that he kept the commandments. But Jesus said that he lacked something. Jesus exposed his real problem when he told him to sell his riches deny himself and follow Him. The man could not. Jesus pretty much showed that the man did not have eternal life because he was possessed of his riches and could not sacrifice them to be a follower of Jesus. That was a Torah observant man, a man who obeyed God. Jesus didn't challenge him on that point. He showed that the man would not enter the Kingdom due to his obsession with wealth.III. Scriptural Evidence - Obedience
ETERNAL LIFE IS BASED ON WHAT YOU DO AFTER BEING FORGIVEN/CLEANSED:
Matthew 19:16 "And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 17And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? There is none good but one, that is, AHYH: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments."
As we can see in your errant interpretations.The Scriptures say AHYH cannot lie (Titus 1:2). The above verse is true. Let AHYH be true and every man a liar. Man is subject to misinterpretation but the Word is infallible.
But obedience always follows faith, not the other way around. Those who reject Christ do not obey Him. But those whose faith is genuine reveal that genuine faith by their obedience. The point is that those who obey Him do so as a result of the salvation/eternal life they have already received and it is they who obey Him. Those who have eternal demonstrate it by their obedience to the Lord. The verse does NOT say that He is the author of salvation to them who obey Him on the grounds of their obedience. You are reading something into that verse that is not there.Hebrews 5:9 "And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;"
Again, this is not salvation by works, but rather works that reveal the character and worldview of the believer who is always captivated by an eternal perspective. They are seeking, not working for glory, honor, immortality, and eternal life. They are living these things out as principles in their life. They animate their Christian walk.Romans 2:7 "To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for esteem and honor and immortality, eternal life:"
.1 John 2:24 "Let that therefore abide in you, which ye have heard from the beginning (Torah). If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father. 25And this is the promise that he hath promised us, even eternal life."
Romans 6:22 "But now being made free from sin, and become servants to AHYH, ye have your fruit unto set-apartness, and the end everlasting life."
Striving to enter the strait gait is not striving for eternal life because the strait gate is not a metaphor for eternal life. Jesus is talking about the difficulty of living the Christian life due to the cost incurred due to what we often have to give up, sacrifice to do so. So often, it is the respect of our friends, the love of some family members, or we have to be willing to give up our pride and love for the things of the world. There is a cost associated with Jesus and it is not an easy cost to pay. That's what the strait gate is about. It is about the believer following Jesus. It is not about someone trying to earn their eternal life.Luke 13:24 "strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able."
In this particular usage, "life everlasting" isn't referring to a period or length of time. It refers to the high quality of life we an have as believers. Jesus referred to it in John 10:10 asGalatians 6:8 "For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting."
In context, that is talking about the Great Tribulation, not being eternal life.Matthew 10:22 "…he that endures to the end the same shall be saved"
The phrase, "I will not blot out his name out of the book of life," is a emphatic negative in Greek. It literally reads, "I will not, no, not ever..." But that needs to be understood in the light of what it means to "overcome." Who is one that overcomes? Answer: "For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world: and this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith. Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?" (1Jn 5:4-5)Revelation 3:4-6 Thou hast a few names even in Sardis which have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with me in white: for they are worthy. 5 He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his agents. 6 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the assemblies.
Please show me a verse that states ETERNAL LIFE is attained by confession or believing.
The goal is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever. THAT is the goal. Overcomers do repent and they continue living for Jesus, but they are not working for salvation/eternal life.AHYH’s will is for man to love HIM and his neighbor. Because we cannot of ourselves do it consistently does not change the fact --- that is what He wants. We are to strive to keep His Torah, when we sin we are to confess and repent and keep striving. This is what the overcomers of Revelation 2-3 do. The goal is to live as Messiah lived.
You said (and I quote) "I would not adhere to anything that came out of the Council of Nicaea"
I did not twist a thing but challenged your fallacious statement above.
Or did you fail to read that this Forum is a DEBATE forum in which challenges are perfectly acceptable?
Yes I often play the Grand Inquisitor (I would say devil's advocate but someone else freaked out when I called myself that because I identified with the devil)
yes in fact you did by innuendo.
Ah, I caught you in your own machinations. you FIRST used the word "replace" in post number 33 (and I quote)
"Messiah replaced the Levitical priesthood. 1John 1:9"
I was simply applying your flawed logic and reasoning elsewhere concerning the Law (Sabbath Keeping) to point out your confusion concerning bible hermeneutics.
Hey Hank, if we are really trying to get to the truth, I must confess I am a normal person. I am not anal retentive, made righteous and imputed are the same. And again because you have not been exposed to "Ahashua" does not mean it is flawed. You are 1 person with an opinion. In the USA we are all allowed our own opinions. Being a normal non-anal person I am going to bed. I will wake-up and easily counter any of your jabs because I have done my due diligence (but that will be after work). Shalom.No, I am not. I know the difference between being forgiven and having eternal life.
Can you cite a single statement from a mainstream theologian/Christian Bible teacher that confuses those two concepts?
This is not true. First of all "Ahashuah" is a made up Name that does not exist in Hebrew. Not a major point, but that is simply not His Name.
Secondly, no place in the Bible does it say anything remotely close to the notion that we are returned to pre-fallen state when we are forgiven. That idea does not exist anywhere in the Bible. We are not made righteous. Righteousness is imputed to us, just as it was to Abraham, per Romans chapter 4: "
He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God; And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform. And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness. Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead; Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification. (Rom 4:20-25)
We have been justified there in v. 25, but also: Rom. 3:24, 28; 4:2; 5:1, 9; 8;30, Gal. 2:16; Tit. 3:7. The word Justified or Justification comes from a Greek word that speaks to a legal state. We are placed in legal right standing with God. This is imputed righteousness. We will one day be made righteous, that is the end result, but it is not the current state of the believer. Right now, we are simply in legal right standing with God through our faith in Jesus Christ.
The moment you place your faith in Jesus, you are saved. Eternal life begins the very moment you are saved.
Wrong. The Bible says it is a gift: Rom. 6:23 says, "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord."
You are quoting that passage out of the context of the story. Jesus was not presenting the man with a theology. He was testing the man and exposing his real problem, namely that he loved his riches more than he loved God. Jesus knew what is response would be, that he kept the commandments. But Jesus said that he lacked something. Jesus exposed his real problem when he told him to sell his riches deny himself and follow Him. The man could not. Jesus pretty much showed that the man did not have eternal life because he was possessed of his riches and could not sacrifice them to be a follower of Jesus. That was a Torah observant man, a man who obeyed God. Jesus didn't challenge him on that point. He showed that the man would not enter the Kingdom due to his obsession with wealth.
As we can see in your errant interpretations.
But obedience always follows faith, not the other way around. Those who reject Christ do not obey Him. But those whose faith is genuine reveal that genuine faith by their obedience. The point is that those who obey Him do so as a result of the salvation/eternal life they have already received and it is they who obey Him. Those who have eternal demonstrate it by their obedience to the Lord. The verse does NOT say that He is the author of salvation to them who obey Him on the grounds of their obedience. You are reading something into that verse that is not there.
Again, this is not salvation by works, but rather works that reveal the character and worldview of the believer who is always captivated by an eternal perspective. They are seeking, not working for glory, honor, immortality, and eternal life. They are living these things out as principles in their life. They animate their Christian walk.
.
But that "if" in Greek is what we call a "first class conditional clause." It is understood as, "If this is true (and I’m assuming it is), then this will happen. This verse is not an example of eternal life that is conditional upon obedience, at all. It is the opposite. He remains in us because salvation is Jesus keeping us, not us trying to hold on to Him.
If salvation is conditional on my obedience, that makes me the savior, not Jesus. It means that salvation is really about me saving myself, and that makes Jesus' sacrifice not only insufficient, but wholly unnecessary.
Response Continued in the Next Post
Amen! Well said! I will never forget, prior to my conversion several years ago while still attending the Roman Catholic church, I read Matthew 7:22 and thought to myself, wow! These many people accomplished all of that, "prophesied in His name, cast out demons, and did many wonderful works" but that still was not "good enough?" Then I thought to myself at that time, how am I going to "top that" and be "good enough?" Such is the mindset of someone who believes that salvation is based on works/merit/performance.Iniquity is the evil, crooked, perverse moral nature that exists within human beings.
Notice that their appeal was to their works, not the grace of God. They stand before the Lord trying to point to the good things that they had done.
Many people, people who are sitting in churches every Sunday believe they are Christians for reasons that have nothing to do with Jesus. They are counting on their own good behavior, or church attendance, or whatever. They participate in the external Christian community but have not embraced Jesus and do not know Him. They mistake their own merit and religiosity for knowing Jesus. They think they know Him on the grounds of their participation in the Christian "religion" and miss out on the actual relationship with the Person of Jesus Christ.
Why are you calling me Hank?Hey Hank, if we are really trying to get to the truth,
No, they are not the same. "Imputed" means that it is credited to you your account for a future time. That is not the same as being "made" righteous. Our sins were imputed to Jesus. He was sinless, but died for our sins and bore the penalty for our sins. But now His righteousness is credited or imputed to us and we will only be made rightesous when we receive the fullness of our inheritance.I must confess I am a normal person. I am not anal retentive, made righteous and imputed are the same.
I am someone who reads and speaks Hebrew and your fake name for God doesn't exist. It's not an opinion, it is just objective fact.And again because you have not been exposed to "Ahashua" does not mean it is flawed. You are 1 person with an opinion.
But not your own facts. And the fact is that are assigning a fake, nonbiblical, nonexistent name to God.In the USA we are all allowed our own opinions.
Due diligence? Not hardly. You can't even get it right with God's Name.Being a normal non-anal person I am going to bed. I will wake-up and easily counter any of your jabs because I have done my due diligence (but that will be after work). Shalom.
Really Torah, you need to acquire debating skill.No, it was a flip comment on my part but such low hanging fruit (who cares). Defines the word petty.
I know who you are.
Only someone with a purpose could find innuendo in that statement.
I can't believe I am responding to someone who would use the word "machinations".
The Trinity is no mystery. "Trinity" is the name of the explination that there is one God and that there are three Persons, God the Father, the Son of God and the Holy Spirit who are that one God.There is one God (being) but three separate Persons. That is a mystery.
It is a mystery in terms of how God can be one being, but three separate and distinct Persons all of whom are equally God.The Trinity is no mystery. "Trinity" is the name of the explination that there is one God and that there are three Persons, God the Father, the Son of God and the Holy Spirit who are that one God.
Hmm you quote GoodTidings but address Hank ?Hey Hank, if we are really trying to get to the truth, I must confess I am a normal person. I am not anal retentive, made righteous and imputed are the same. And again because you have not been exposed to "Ahashua" does not mean it is flawed. You are 1 person with an opinion. In the USA we are all allowed our own opinions. Being a normal non-anal person I am going to bed. I will wake-up and easily counter any of your jabs because I have done my due diligence (but that will be after work). Shalom.