I’ve separated out your post so that I may respond to your points.
I can understand where some may draw the conclusion that Calvinist “disparages the character of God.” However, to the Calvinist thinking, the idea that God isn’t smart enough, insightful of what humans call future, or is hopefully surprised at human decisions that characterizes the extrapolation of other schemes is disparaging the character of God.
Would you not agree that God is not conformed to human time, nor the human condition of having to hope something happens?
Would you not agree that God knows everything, is surprised by nothing, and is needing no recalculating plan or a plan “B”?
Certainly, God desires all to be saved, just as He committed the Son to shed the blood for all sin. However, you and I recognize that the appeal does not impact all the same. God’s appeal through Moses to pharaoh, Joshua’s appeal to the Israelites, the Christ’s appeal to Jerusalem, Peter’s appeal at Pentecost… all resulted in a few out of the many.
Does humankind have the ability to “follow Jesus?” Yes
Is it successful? No. “Depart from me I never knew you”.
One can be the disciple of the Lord, and never know Him.
Who is the mediator that must wait on humans to activate sin-filled frail faith?
And all this is correct, however, is human faith sufficient? Nope.
The Lord and Paul both mention faith capable of moving mountains, yet no human simply by their own fallen faith can even add a single measure of height to themself, how much less could they move dirt or engage the creator?
As you pointed out, the presentation of Scriptures is a must for the Holy Spirit to work. How that happens is the struggle of human construction and centuries of debate.
For me, I find no freedom of the will or human faith in the unbeliever, rather does not the Scriptures present the enslavement of the unbeliever in ever increasing depravity and payment of death?
Sure all humans can choose “good” gifts, but s both good and perfect gifts not from God?
So, knowing that innate faith and the will is both frailty and corrupt, does not God appoint to the believer a new creation so that nothing of the flesh enters the new heaven and earth?
Did not Paul state that it does not appear what we shall be, but just as the seed does not represent the plant, our current physical is not representative of what we shall be.
Certainly. The message is both simple and foolish. Does not God take the foolish to confound the wise?
From the response stated above you can read part of my thinking concerning freedom of the will. I had withstand a lowered grade in graduate school because I dared write the final paper concerning why dogs return to their vomit.
This is good, for without the work of the Scriptures any change is as steady as the direction of tomorrow’s wind.
The most troubling area for me concerning the Calvinist view is that it disparages the character of God. They have God hold out the offer of salvation to all and yet according to them it is only meant for a select few. This is in spite of the verses that say God desires all to be saved. (1Ti_2:3-4, 2Pe_3:9, Eze_18:23, Eze_18:32, Joh_12:32) And expects that they can indeed make that choice to follow Christ Jesus. (Joh 3:16, Joh 3:18)
I can understand where some may draw the conclusion that Calvinist “disparages the character of God.” However, to the Calvinist thinking, the idea that God isn’t smart enough, insightful of what humans call future, or is hopefully surprised at human decisions that characterizes the extrapolation of other schemes is disparaging the character of God.
Would you not agree that God is not conformed to human time, nor the human condition of having to hope something happens?
Would you not agree that God knows everything, is surprised by nothing, and is needing no recalculating plan or a plan “B”?
Certainly, God desires all to be saved, just as He committed the Son to shed the blood for all sin. However, you and I recognize that the appeal does not impact all the same. God’s appeal through Moses to pharaoh, Joshua’s appeal to the Israelites, the Christ’s appeal to Jerusalem, Peter’s appeal at Pentecost… all resulted in a few out of the many.
Does humankind have the ability to “follow Jesus?” Yes
Is it successful? No. “Depart from me I never knew you”.
One can be the disciple of the Lord, and never know Him.
Who is the mediator that must wait on humans to activate sin-filled frail faith?
God has presented creation as a means of drawing people to Himself and says man has no excuse because of it. (Rom_1:20) He also presents the gospel message which enables man to trust in Christ Jesus for salvation. (Eph 1:13, Rom 10:14) God has made it clear that for those that turn to Christ Jesus in faith they will be saved. (Rom 10:9-10)
And all this is correct, however, is human faith sufficient? Nope.
The Lord and Paul both mention faith capable of moving mountains, yet no human simply by their own fallen faith can even add a single measure of height to themself, how much less could they move dirt or engage the creator?
As you pointed out, the presentation of Scriptures is a must for the Holy Spirit to work. How that happens is the struggle of human construction and centuries of debate.
For me, I find no freedom of the will or human faith in the unbeliever, rather does not the Scriptures present the enslavement of the unbeliever in ever increasing depravity and payment of death?
Sure all humans can choose “good” gifts, but s both good and perfect gifts not from God?
So, knowing that innate faith and the will is both frailty and corrupt, does not God appoint to the believer a new creation so that nothing of the flesh enters the new heaven and earth?
Did not Paul state that it does not appear what we shall be, but just as the seed does not represent the plant, our current physical is not representative of what we shall be.
Christ Jesus is the cornerstone of our faith as we are told in Isa 28:16 and it is through trusting in Him that we are saved (Rom 10:13) As I understand it God has made salvation simple so that it is available to anyone. God, because His is sovereign, has given man a free will so that they can accept or reject the gospel message and are thus responsible for those choices.
Certainly. The message is both simple and foolish. Does not God take the foolish to confound the wise?
From the response stated above you can read part of my thinking concerning freedom of the will. I had withstand a lowered grade in graduate school because I dared write the final paper concerning why dogs return to their vomit.
Some will disagree with what I have said and that is ok as I am not here to change their minds. I just let scripture form my theology.
This is good, for without the work of the Scriptures any change is as steady as the direction of tomorrow’s wind.